RS:
I will quickly sum up the problems of your post.
[1]
RS: "...and was called a liar by a moderator."
The moderator never called you a liar. Feel free to prove me wrong on this one.
[2]
RS: "the reason I ask is that my cell phone discount was applied immediately but you contest it probably won't happen, would happen at a lesser degree, or wouldn't happen for several months."
I will post discussions from the official forums.att.com website regarding users that applied for the corporate application.
life02: "As far as the corporate discount is concerned, it will vary from company to company. My company discount is 25% service for my spouse and I. There are restricitons, however, such as the discount doesn't apply to Iphone data packages, etc. There is no way knowing what the corporate discount will cover for you specifically, if anything at all. Are you on a family plan with you mom? If not, the discount may not even apply."
charjen: "BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! they tell you there is a corporate discount, they encourage you to apply! Then they give you the run-a-round! Your numbers are wrong, your identification isn't the right kind. you will send in your papers dozens of times and never get acknowledgment that they were received, and when you call they tell you the numbers were wrong. AGAIN!. We, at my job, were told by a A T & T salesperson that we were eligible, and all who carried A T & T all applied. NOT ONE PERSON has received a discount of any kind. not one! We started the process in April of 2011 and here it is December! don't fall into a paperwork trap! Just know that A T & T says they will, but they are being so dishonest when they say that. ITS ALL A LIE!"
Now, I can't say from personal experience that they are correct, but i'm more inclined to believe someone who doesn't benefit financially from recruiting others by making claims about savings on your monthly phone bill.
Also worth noting is your previous claim about your monthly cell phone savings:
RS: "...as I explained earlier I knew I wouldn't lose money because I was getting the extra 7% off a month on my cell bill. That covered most of the cost at $24.95 so it seemed like a no risk venture.
Bjl584 pointed out: "If $24.95 represents 7% of your monthly cell phone bill, then your monthly cell phone bill is $356.43. "
First of all, why didn't save 22% like WakeUpNow claims you can save up to? Why were you only qualified for a 7% savings? Second of all, why the heck do have a $356.64 monthly cellphone bill? The corporate discount is not a discount on your monthly cellphone bill, it's on the plan itself. Life02 states in the AT&T forums that the discount excluded iphone data packages, ect,. Your argument is looking very empty here.
[3]
RS: "Additionally you reference Wells Fargo personal finance package in lieu of the finance program this company offers. What if I don't bank with them or more likely what if I'm concerned that the information they provide might be potentially littered with marketing and propaganda used to guide me into their profit ranges. I am confident that since this website is so dedicated to informing the hapless public that you surely know that any "free" product is not in any way free but actually is using subscribers to generate profit. i.e. data analytics, marketing, partnership ads, etc."
Then I'm sure that other banks have some version of free budgeting tools, too. There is no need to pay for this service by joining WakeUpNow for a $100 monthly fee. It's funny you would exclude the possibility of WakeUpNow using your budgeting information from analytis, marketing, partnership ads ect,. but assume that WellsFargo is doing it. WellsFargo generates profit by having customers, it's not a "free" per se, but the service doesn't cost members whereas the budgeting tools from WakeUpNow does. If anything, a newly created, dishonest business like WakeUpNow is much more likely to take advantage of its customers than a national 100-year old bank. On top of that, you haven't shown any proof that Wells Fargo or any other bank uses its budgeting tools for marketing or any other information. Sources for your claim that they "might potentially be" using these budgeting tools for this kind of purpose?
[4]
RS: "I haven't used the ID Theft program but even if it's as you claim a worthwhile expense at $9 a month why wouldn't it be a $9 a month value?"
I'm not excluding the possibility that ID theft is worth $9 a month. But if I want ID theft protection, I would rather pay for a trusted brand with my $9 a month instead of my $100 for the inclusion of an off-brand kind that WakeUpNow offers.
[5]
RS: "You also failed to identify what I think is one of the larger values in the program, TaxBot. Maybe because I work for myself or because I'm a numbers dork but I really like the tool and it has saved me vastly more than the things that you mention but you didn't even address it."
Then pay $9.99 a month as a standalone service for TaxBot. There are cheaper alternatives to TaxBot also.
[6]
RS: "Coupons are useless for the most part in any case because they direct you to name brand products and the vast percentage of them are pre packaged. I like to buy base ingredients when I can usually bulk and find it saves far more than coupons ever do."
Actually you can shop all coupons available by store. So the stores you usually grocery shop at will give you a list of coupons. There are coupons available for base ingredients also. I'm really not sure what you're even trying to prove here. The coupons WakeUpNow offers are exactly the same as the ones currently offered by distributors online.
[7]
RS: "I mentioned previously that I saved $160 on tickets to Disneyland. I spent a lot of time trying to find the same or better discounts anywhere and wasn't able too."
You can make all the claims in the world. "saving" $160 can mean a lot of things. Is it the retail price offered vs. other discounted price available elsewhere? In any case, you could just save $200 by staying out of the business for 2 months and have an extra $40 to buy yourself dinner while you're there.
[8]
RS: "I am not supporting their get rich with this program recruiting people mentality.. that seems like a fools errand but the constant scam accusation seems as ridiculous as me quitting my job to work for an MLM full time"
A scam is a "dishonest scheme" according to dictionary.com. When 82% of people in the business lose money but they market it as a way to "start making money today" then yes, this company is a dishonest scheme therefore it is a scam.
[9]
RS: "I only pay $24.95 a month and I receive far greater benefit than that investment which seems to me would be the exact nature of a worthwhile retail product; which oddly enough I think a few people on this very thread have tried to suggest was non existent?"
You have only made claims and haven't shown any evidence. Your monthly cellphone bill savings for example.
[10]
RS: "Again with no moderation from the "moderators" who seem to have a dog in this fight... And the dog doesn't appear to be giving their subscribers quality thoughtful and logical information, it appears that nobody here is providing anything other than hearsay, conjecture, and hyperbole."
Referencing the losses of the income disclosure, it's logical to say that is not a worthy investment. You bring no evidence to back up your claims whereas they reference the facts. Who wins here? Not you.
Originally posted by RSinsights
View Post
[1]
RS: "...and was called a liar by a moderator."
The moderator never called you a liar. Feel free to prove me wrong on this one.
[2]
RS: "the reason I ask is that my cell phone discount was applied immediately but you contest it probably won't happen, would happen at a lesser degree, or wouldn't happen for several months."
I will post discussions from the official forums.att.com website regarding users that applied for the corporate application.
life02: "As far as the corporate discount is concerned, it will vary from company to company. My company discount is 25% service for my spouse and I. There are restricitons, however, such as the discount doesn't apply to Iphone data packages, etc. There is no way knowing what the corporate discount will cover for you specifically, if anything at all. Are you on a family plan with you mom? If not, the discount may not even apply."
charjen: "BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! they tell you there is a corporate discount, they encourage you to apply! Then they give you the run-a-round! Your numbers are wrong, your identification isn't the right kind. you will send in your papers dozens of times and never get acknowledgment that they were received, and when you call they tell you the numbers were wrong. AGAIN!. We, at my job, were told by a A T & T salesperson that we were eligible, and all who carried A T & T all applied. NOT ONE PERSON has received a discount of any kind. not one! We started the process in April of 2011 and here it is December! don't fall into a paperwork trap! Just know that A T & T says they will, but they are being so dishonest when they say that. ITS ALL A LIE!"
Now, I can't say from personal experience that they are correct, but i'm more inclined to believe someone who doesn't benefit financially from recruiting others by making claims about savings on your monthly phone bill.
Also worth noting is your previous claim about your monthly cell phone savings:
RS: "...as I explained earlier I knew I wouldn't lose money because I was getting the extra 7% off a month on my cell bill. That covered most of the cost at $24.95 so it seemed like a no risk venture.
Bjl584 pointed out: "If $24.95 represents 7% of your monthly cell phone bill, then your monthly cell phone bill is $356.43. "
First of all, why didn't save 22% like WakeUpNow claims you can save up to? Why were you only qualified for a 7% savings? Second of all, why the heck do have a $356.64 monthly cellphone bill? The corporate discount is not a discount on your monthly cellphone bill, it's on the plan itself. Life02 states in the AT&T forums that the discount excluded iphone data packages, ect,. Your argument is looking very empty here.
[3]
RS: "Additionally you reference Wells Fargo personal finance package in lieu of the finance program this company offers. What if I don't bank with them or more likely what if I'm concerned that the information they provide might be potentially littered with marketing and propaganda used to guide me into their profit ranges. I am confident that since this website is so dedicated to informing the hapless public that you surely know that any "free" product is not in any way free but actually is using subscribers to generate profit. i.e. data analytics, marketing, partnership ads, etc."
Then I'm sure that other banks have some version of free budgeting tools, too. There is no need to pay for this service by joining WakeUpNow for a $100 monthly fee. It's funny you would exclude the possibility of WakeUpNow using your budgeting information from analytis, marketing, partnership ads ect,. but assume that WellsFargo is doing it. WellsFargo generates profit by having customers, it's not a "free" per se, but the service doesn't cost members whereas the budgeting tools from WakeUpNow does. If anything, a newly created, dishonest business like WakeUpNow is much more likely to take advantage of its customers than a national 100-year old bank. On top of that, you haven't shown any proof that Wells Fargo or any other bank uses its budgeting tools for marketing or any other information. Sources for your claim that they "might potentially be" using these budgeting tools for this kind of purpose?
[4]
RS: "I haven't used the ID Theft program but even if it's as you claim a worthwhile expense at $9 a month why wouldn't it be a $9 a month value?"
I'm not excluding the possibility that ID theft is worth $9 a month. But if I want ID theft protection, I would rather pay for a trusted brand with my $9 a month instead of my $100 for the inclusion of an off-brand kind that WakeUpNow offers.
[5]
RS: "You also failed to identify what I think is one of the larger values in the program, TaxBot. Maybe because I work for myself or because I'm a numbers dork but I really like the tool and it has saved me vastly more than the things that you mention but you didn't even address it."
Then pay $9.99 a month as a standalone service for TaxBot. There are cheaper alternatives to TaxBot also.
[6]
RS: "Coupons are useless for the most part in any case because they direct you to name brand products and the vast percentage of them are pre packaged. I like to buy base ingredients when I can usually bulk and find it saves far more than coupons ever do."
Actually you can shop all coupons available by store. So the stores you usually grocery shop at will give you a list of coupons. There are coupons available for base ingredients also. I'm really not sure what you're even trying to prove here. The coupons WakeUpNow offers are exactly the same as the ones currently offered by distributors online.
[7]
RS: "I mentioned previously that I saved $160 on tickets to Disneyland. I spent a lot of time trying to find the same or better discounts anywhere and wasn't able too."
You can make all the claims in the world. "saving" $160 can mean a lot of things. Is it the retail price offered vs. other discounted price available elsewhere? In any case, you could just save $200 by staying out of the business for 2 months and have an extra $40 to buy yourself dinner while you're there.
[8]
RS: "I am not supporting their get rich with this program recruiting people mentality.. that seems like a fools errand but the constant scam accusation seems as ridiculous as me quitting my job to work for an MLM full time"
A scam is a "dishonest scheme" according to dictionary.com. When 82% of people in the business lose money but they market it as a way to "start making money today" then yes, this company is a dishonest scheme therefore it is a scam.
[9]
RS: "I only pay $24.95 a month and I receive far greater benefit than that investment which seems to me would be the exact nature of a worthwhile retail product; which oddly enough I think a few people on this very thread have tried to suggest was non existent?"
You have only made claims and haven't shown any evidence. Your monthly cellphone bill savings for example.
[10]
RS: "Again with no moderation from the "moderators" who seem to have a dog in this fight... And the dog doesn't appear to be giving their subscribers quality thoughtful and logical information, it appears that nobody here is providing anything other than hearsay, conjecture, and hyperbole."
Referencing the losses of the income disclosure, it's logical to say that is not a worthy investment. You bring no evidence to back up your claims whereas they reference the facts. Who wins here? Not you.
Comment