The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

Vaccination free for-all

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TexasHusker
    replied
    Here’s both sides.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • LivingAlmostLarge
    replied
    I got a vaccine today as well! Woot!

    Leave a comment:


  • QuarterMillionMan
    replied
    Refreshing to see all sides. All I see & hear is mask up, distancing (ie, 6 feet, now 3 feet is fine in schools), shut down, reopen 15%, 25%, 50%, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • TexasHusker
    replied
    Originally posted by disneysteve View Post
    That's all we can all do. Follow the science, do the right things, and get the vaccine.

    I'm glad you had a good experience. I've heard many similar reports from the mass vaccination sites. They must be doing something right to be vaccinating close to 3 million/day.
    The science that was invented in March 2020 that turned out to be a farce?

    Leave a comment:


  • disneysteve
    replied
    Originally posted by ua_guy View Post
    We are near the completion of our original PLAN A, which was to listen to good medical advice, avoid getting sick by wearing masks and distancing, and to take the vaccine when it becomes available.
    That's all we can all do. Follow the science, do the right things, and get the vaccine.

    I'm glad you had a good experience. I've heard many similar reports from the mass vaccination sites. They must be doing something right to be vaccinating close to 3 million/day.

    Leave a comment:


  • ua_guy
    replied
    My husband and I received our first doses of Moderna this weekend through a mass vaccination site. It was held at a community hospital and staffed by a mix of hospital staff, as well as police/fire, both career and volunteer. I was very impressed, and overjoyed!! We expected chaos, but it was exactly the opposite. It had a very logical progression, there were no delays, and the staff were wonderful--they were running a very tight ship. Bonus: We are automatically enrolled for the 2nd dose when they do it again in a month.

    We are near the completion of our original PLAN A, which was to listen to good medical advice, avoid getting sick by wearing masks and distancing, and to take the vaccine when it becomes available.

    Leave a comment:


  • TexasHusker
    replied
    Originally posted by disneysteve View Post


    Remember, "flattening the curve" wasn't about decreasing the total number of cases. It was about spreading them out over a longer period of time so the healthcare system wasn't overwhelmed. And that worked very well.

    Or the virus did what viruses do, and flattened its own curve, which is what the overwhelming evidence tells us. Human behavior isn’t changing the behavior of this virus.

    Leave a comment:


  • disneysteve
    replied
    Originally posted by Like2Plan View Post

    This is anecdotal--so meaningless really, but I have heard of folks who got COVID after being vaccinated which was unexpected when I first learned about it. I have no way of knowing when they exposed (before being vaccinated? within 2 weeks of the first dose?) and they didn't get hospitalized, so I guess not a severe case. (I also know someone who was exposed to someone who had a laboratory confirmed case of COVID 2 weeks after the first dose of Pfizer and did not get COVID).
    I know a number of people who got COVID despite being fully vaccinated, and it happened long after the 2nd dose so they couldn't have been infected at the time of the vaccination. It's going to happen. The vaccine isn't 100% effective. There are still going to be cases even if every single person gets vaccinated, which isn't going to happen.

    But, I will say what I find troubling is that the infection rates have been going up in some places--for example: Michigan and New York--lots of east coast states despite the vaccination rates going up. My own state (VA) has not come down as much as I would expect-- VA has been in the top 20 (in terms of COVID infections) for several weeks. I would like to know why--new variant? what? I really hope the vaccine holds up against the variants.
    Cases have been rising in NJ. The variants might be part of the issue. And, of course, relaxed restrictions and people changing their behavior is behind a lot of it. As more things open and more people gather and mask usage decreases, we will see more cases. There's no good way around that. It won't reach the level it was at during the peak, but it's going to happen.

    Remember, "flattening the curve" wasn't about decreasing the total number of cases. It was about spreading them out over a longer period of time so the healthcare system wasn't overwhelmed. And that worked very well.

    Leave a comment:


  • disneysteve
    replied
    Originally posted by TexasHusker View Post

    Until we have widespread vaccinations, I expect hospitalizations to fluctuate, yet never approach the peaks we had pre-vaccine.
    I think that's a fair statement. 143 million Americans have had at least one shot and 52 million are fully vaccinated, and those numbers are rising quickly by 2-3 million/day. We're definitely past the worst of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Like2Plan
    replied
    Originally posted by TexasHusker View Post

    That study is British, and there is a vested interest in Britain to promote the vaccine of their own maker, Astra.

    FDA reporting low 90s % efficacy after one dose for Pfizer / Moderna.

    https://nypost.com/2021/02/18/single...ective-as-two/
    Those are certainly good results. It could be that in the UK they were dealing with the UK variant.

    This is anecdotal--so meaningless really, but I have heard of folks who got COVID after being vaccinated which was unexpected when I first learned about it. I have no way of knowing when they exposed (before being vaccinated? within 2 weeks of the first dose?) and they didn't get hospitalized, so I guess not a severe case. (I also know someone who was exposed to someone who had a laboratory confirmed case of COVID 2 weeks after the first dose of Pfizer and did not get COVID).

    But, I will say what I find troubling is that the infection rates have been going up in some places--for example: Michigan and New York--lots of east coast states despite the vaccination rates going up. My own state (VA) has not come down as much as I would expect-- VA has been in the top 20 (in terms of COVID infections) for several weeks. I would like to know why--new variant? what? I really hope the vaccine holds up against the variants.

    Leave a comment:


  • TexasHusker
    replied
    Originally posted by disneysteve View Post

    In our hospital system, we were down to 79 hospitalized COVID patients on 3/14. By last week, we were back up to 123, the highest since mid February. So at least here, hospitalizations are definitely not plummeting. Just the opposite.

    As for always hearing about COVID, that's likely true. Most epidemiologists expect COVID to become endemic, meaning it will always be with us, just like the flu. And I suspect we will need an annual booster vaccine, just like the flu. The ideal would be if they can come out with a combined shot so that one shot covers both.
    Until we have widespread vaccinations, I expect hospitalizations to fluctuate, yet never approach the peaks we had pre-vaccine.

    Leave a comment:


  • disneysteve
    replied
    Originally posted by TexasHusker View Post

    While cases could be rising or falling week to week, CNN isn’t reporting that hospitalizations and deaths are plummeting.
    In our hospital system, we were down to 79 hospitalized COVID patients on 3/14. By last week, we were back up to 123, the highest since mid February. So at least here, hospitalizations are definitely not plummeting. Just the opposite.

    As for always hearing about COVID, that's likely true. Most epidemiologists expect COVID to become endemic, meaning it will always be with us, just like the flu. And I suspect we will need an annual booster vaccine, just like the flu. The ideal would be if they can come out with a combined shot so that one shot covers both.

    Leave a comment:


  • TexasHusker
    replied
    Originally posted by Like2Plan View Post

    "What exactly was the CDC studying?

    Reed said the CDC's report “did not examine the effectiveness of masks.”
    Instead, it analyzed the connection between mask mandate policies and the rate of new county-level coronavirus cases and deaths. It also examined the link between allowing on-site restaurant dining and the number of coronavirus cases and deaths."


    "The claim that a CDC study found face masks to have a negligible effect on the spread of COVID-19 is FALSE. The study referenced in the One America News Network report says the opposite, noting that mask mandates were linked to “statistically significant decreases” in COVID-19 case within 20 days of implementation."

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ns/6938262002/
    Is 1.5% per day a “statistically significant decrease”? Ok.

    You are correct: The purpose of the CDC study was not mask effectiveness per se. The CDC doesn’t want that result. Yet the results that they DID publish merely add to the mountain of statistical evidence that clearly suggests that human behavior did not blunt the spread of COVID in any measurable way.

    Persisting in arguing otherwise is, at this point, laughable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Like2Plan
    replied
    Originally posted by TexasHusker View Post

    I’m not sure what restrictions you are referring to, but if you do even a cursory comparison of all the states, regardless of their restrictions or lack thereof, the outcomes and trend lines are remarkably similar. Human behavior isn’t altering the behavior of this virus.

    Furthermore, the various restrictions were originally imposed to “flatten the curve” (which they didn’t), AND by doing so, keeping the hospitals from being overrun.

    In terms of the effectiveness of the masks, even the CDC’s own data, published (buried) in a December report, stated that masks “may” have “helped prevent” the spread of COVID by as much as 1.5% per day. Not 50,40,30,20,10, or even 5 percent. 1.5 percent. And that’s a “may have”.

    Today, the folks who were in any sort of vulnerable risk category have had the chance to receive a vaccine. While cases could be rising or falling week to week, CNN isn’t reporting that hospitalizations and deaths are plummeting. That’s because COVID is about like the flu for the 40-and-under crowd, who isn’t yet vaccinated.

    Simultaneously, some states are moving toward masking as a permanent new normal. That’s sad. This used to be a free country.
    "What exactly was the CDC studying?

    Reed said the CDC's report “did not examine the effectiveness of masks.”
    Instead, it analyzed the connection between mask mandate policies and the rate of new county-level coronavirus cases and deaths. It also examined the link between allowing on-site restaurant dining and the number of coronavirus cases and deaths."


    "The claim that a CDC study found face masks to have a negligible effect on the spread of COVID-19 is FALSE. The study referenced in the One America News Network report says the opposite, noting that mask mandates were linked to “statistically significant decreases” in COVID-19 case within 20 days of implementation."

    A widely shared post from One America News Network claims that a CDC study found "masks have negligible impact on coronavirus numbers." This is false.

    Leave a comment:


  • TexasHusker
    replied
    I have spent the weekend in Houston at a downtown Hilton that just reopened after a YEAR. Very limited restaurant offerings and operating hours, two or three linen items, no daily housekeeping, but they do have mask police everywhere. It’s sad while simultaneously frightening how masses of people have been so easily duped, and continue to be.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X