So I have been trying for over year to explain to my friend Ms I how her Mother in Law can retire already at 73 with no savings. That she keeps on working because it's the best job ever but Ms I and Mr M don't get it and neither does the MIL that she's fine. Here's the thing she is working so she's paying taxes. She is colleting SS because she has to. All three of them are thinking they need X amount of money to retire. Ms I and Mr M tried to help his mom by taking her to a CFP. But I explained it doesn't matter. They need to tell her it'll be okay. why?
Because she doesn't make a ton working in the kitchen of the university. Yes she has "health" insurance which is primary and medicare is secondary. But she makes so little that if she retired she'd likely qualify for Medicaid. She would probably be living about the same amount of money now that she makes and pays taxes on. I tried to explain again this weekend to Ms I and she threw up her hand and said "she (MIL) just needs to work until she dies." So Mr M they do give his mom money but I think it's that they are all aren't into "money" so they can't wrap their heads around retiring without any savings.
I don't know how to change this I guess because we all go on about "saving" for retirement. But in truth, isn't there a lot of people who can and do retire with just SS? And they manage fine? And they haven't saved? A lot of it stems from people who just don't make much to begin with so SS makes up a large if not all of their income they were making working?
I only know this because of my grandmother. I mean by normal standards $900/month is not a lot of money. But she can manage. And my great grandmother made $560/month but her "rent' was $85 and she had medicare/medicaid. She worked until like 65 (cleaning musuem and homes) and no savings, no house, etc. And yes her kids did give her money but I know it's totally possible.
I guess it's just hard to explain to people that you can retire with pretty much nothing. It's not pretty but it's not impossible. I guess it just makes me question what are we saving for?
Because she doesn't make a ton working in the kitchen of the university. Yes she has "health" insurance which is primary and medicare is secondary. But she makes so little that if she retired she'd likely qualify for Medicaid. She would probably be living about the same amount of money now that she makes and pays taxes on. I tried to explain again this weekend to Ms I and she threw up her hand and said "she (MIL) just needs to work until she dies." So Mr M they do give his mom money but I think it's that they are all aren't into "money" so they can't wrap their heads around retiring without any savings.
I don't know how to change this I guess because we all go on about "saving" for retirement. But in truth, isn't there a lot of people who can and do retire with just SS? And they manage fine? And they haven't saved? A lot of it stems from people who just don't make much to begin with so SS makes up a large if not all of their income they were making working?
I only know this because of my grandmother. I mean by normal standards $900/month is not a lot of money. But she can manage. And my great grandmother made $560/month but her "rent' was $85 and she had medicare/medicaid. She worked until like 65 (cleaning musuem and homes) and no savings, no house, etc. And yes her kids did give her money but I know it's totally possible.
I guess it's just hard to explain to people that you can retire with pretty much nothing. It's not pretty but it's not impossible. I guess it just makes me question what are we saving for?
Comment