The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

Nearly 7 in 10 Americans have less than $1,000 in savings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nearly 7 in 10 Americans have less than $1,000 in savings

    From CNN Money.

    This made the front page of the Drudge Report:
    --------------------------

    America's spend-first mentality is a genuine concern.

    The U.S. is often referred to as the land of economic opportunity. Apparently, it's also the land of consumption and "spend everything you've got."

    We don't have to look far for confirmation that Americans are generally poor savers. Every month the St. Louis Federal Reserve releases data on personal household savings rates. In July 2016, the personal savings rate was just 5.7%. Comparatively, personal savings rates in the U.S. 50 years ago were double where they are today, and nearly all developed countries have a higher personal savings rate than the United States. In other words, Americans are saving less of their income than they should be — the recommendation is to save between 10% and 15% of your annual income — and they're being forced to do more with less in terms of investing.
    America's poor savings habits

    However, new data emerged this week from personal-finance news website GoBankingRates that shows just how dire Americans' savings habits really are.

    Last year, GoBankingRates surveyed more than 5,000 Americans only to uncover that 62% of them had less than $1,000 in savings. Last month GoBankingRates again posed the question to Americans of how much they had in their savings account, only this time it asked 7,052 people. The result? Nearly seven in 10 Americans (69%) had less than $1,000 in their savings account.

    Breaking the survey data down a bit further, we find that 34% of Americans don't have a dime in their savings account, while another 35% have less than $1,000. Of the remaining survey-takers, 11% have between $1,000 and $4,999, 4% have between $5,000 and $9,999, and 15% have more than $10,000.

    Furthermore, even though lower-income adults struggle with saving money more than middle- and upper-income folks, no income group did particularly well. Some 29% of adults earning more than $150,000 a year, and 44% making between $100,000 and $149,999, had less than $1,000 in savings. Comparatively, 73% of the lowest income adults (those earnings $24,999 or less annually) had less than $1,000 in their savings account.

    There was even minimal difference between multiple generations of Americans. From seniors aged 65 and up to young millennials aged 18 to 24, between 62% and 72% of Americans had less than $1,000 in a savings account.

    The sources of America's poor saving habits:

    This data is particularly worrisome since the recommendation is for Americans to have six months in expenses saved in case of an emergency, such as a large medical expense, car repair bill, or losing your job. Without this emergency fund to fall back on, millions of Americans could be risking financial disaster.

    According to GoBankingRates' report, two factors are to blame for Americans' inability to save. First, some Americans are simply living beyond their means. With roughly 70% of U.S. GDP tied to consumption, and our society revolving around going out for entertainment, this isn't too surprising.

    The other issue is that credit cards and alternative payment platforms, such as Apple Pay, have made it easier than ever to spend money. It's a lot easier to spend money when you're not dealing with tangible cash. This out of sight, out of mind mentality could leave Americans out of money when they need it.

    Six tips to a better budget

    The obvious solution to fixing America's savings woes is for Americans to adopt (and stick to) a detailed monthly budget. A 2013 survey from national pollster Gallup found that just 32% of American households were sticking to a monthly budget. Without a budget it can be practically impossible for consumers to understand their cash flow – and if they don't understand their cash flow, they won't be able to maximize their savings.

    With this in mind, here are six tips that should help get you on the right track to growing your savings account and building a healthy emergency fund.

    1. Use online budgeting tools

    The first move to make is to use online budgeting software. The days of having to formulate a budget by hand are long gone, and they've been replaced by a plethora of online budgeting tools, some of which are free. In many instances online budgeting software will not only handle the grunt work of adding and subtracting, but it can also help you formulate a savings plan based on the dollar amount or percentage of earned income you want to save. In roughly 30 minutes you could have a working budget in place.
    Woman Adding A Coin To Piggy Bank Getty

    2. Surround yourself with like-minded people

    The second key to a great budget is that you'll want to surround yourself with like-minded people that share your goal of financial betterment. Your chances of sticking to your budget will be substantially higher if everyone in your household, including a significant other, kids, grandparents, or friends, are also sticking to a budget. If you live alone, consider meeting up with a group of people once or twice monthly who share the same mission as you (to save money).

    3. Consider the use of separate accounts or cash

    It's no secret that Americans have a propensity to spend first and ask questions later, which is made easy with the use of credit cards and alternative payment options. One of the best ways to break the "spend first" habit is to consider the use of separate spending accounts. For example, if you're budgeting $300 a month to entertainment, consider putting that $300 in a separate account or even a jar in the kitchen cupboard to create a degree of separation from your checking or savings account. This could cut down your desire to spend money if you see that it's available.

    Another possible suggestion involves using cash instead of credit. Cash is tangible, and having to open your wallet and part with your cash to purchase a good or service can make a person think twice about whether a good or service is necessary.

    4. Set up automatic withdrawals

    Fourth, it's important to set up automatic withdrawals to hold yourself accountable for your spending and saving habits. It doesn't matter whether you have withdrawals made directly from your paycheck or you set up automatic transfers from a checking account to a savings account; the point being simply that you have withdrawals made automatically to keep yourself on track to save. This also removes the need to remember to make withdrawals weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly, and eliminates a prime excuse for not saving.

    5. Be S.M.A.R.T.

    Fifth, it's important to set S.M.A.R.T. goals with your budget. The acronym "SMART" stands for:

    Specific
    Measurable
    Achievable
    Realistic
    Time-based

    One of the reasons so many Americans probably fail in their efforts to save more is their goals are too vague or lofty. Simply saying that you'll "save more" is far too vague and doesn't allow for an individual to measure their progress or adjust their spending and saving habits. However, setting specific, yet achievable, savings goals allows you to regularly measure your progress and make adjustments on an as-needed basis. Remember, this is your budget, and you can make changes to it as you see fit.
    6. Analyze your data monthly

    Finally, make sure you're analyzing your budget regularly (which is where the "measurable" aspect of SMART goal-setting comes into play). Though you may choose to analyze your spending habits more or less frequently, setting aside 15 to 30 minutes each month to measure your progress and make adjustments is often sufficient.

    America's saving habits may be poor now, but it really wouldn't take much to right the ship.

    Sean Williams has no material interest in any companies mentioned in this article. You can follow him on CAPS under the screen name TMFUltraLong, and check him out on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @TMFUltraLong.

    Linky: http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/...study/91083712
    james.c.hendrickson@gmail.com
    202.468.6043

  • #2
    So, I'm assuming this doesn't take into account retirement savings? Seems to just be referring to personal savings accounts only.

    Comment


    • #3
      It does make me sad that people can't even come up with $1000 for savings. This should be a minimum set aside. A good goal would be to have this by the time one graduates high school!
      My other blog is Your Organized Friend.

      Comment


      • #4
        If they wanted me to answer, "How much money is in your savings account?", I'd have to answer that I don't have a savings account, at least not as defined by a bank. Savings accounts have not had favorable terms, so I have not opened one. My money deposited to banks are in interest bearing checking.

        By the way, I just surfed through gobanking.com's internal links to find that the survey they base that figure on is a year old. In their October 5 2015 article they say, " Even worse, the next-most-common answer is “I don’t have a savings account,” selected by one in five people (20.7 percent)."
        "There is some ontological doubt as to whether it may even be possible in principle to nail down these things in the universe we're given to study." --text msg from my kid

        "It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men." --Frederick Douglass

        Comment


        • #5
          Yeah, it just seems like it's cherry picking data. Not that I'm saying the state of savings in the US is good - but it's not providing a complete picture.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by HundredK View Post
            Yeah, it just seems like it's cherry picking data. Not that I'm saying the state of savings in the US is good - but it's not providing a complete picture.
            This is the single most destructive fact in any (nearly all) studies strewn about in the world, most especially here in the US. Statistics are constantly taken completely out of their context, and are almost always given whatever spin the researcher and/or the writer/reporter wants the data to convey. Research methods are also highly prejudiced, and commonly misconstrue the truth (such as by phrasing poll questions in a leading manner).

            We're in politics season... I think this problem becomes ever more clear right now. For example (using completely arbitrary, simple numbers)... Let's say polling shows that 20% of Americans strongly support Clinton, 20% strongly support Trump, 20% "lean" toward each one, and 20% are undecided or support another candidate.

            From that data, it would be extremely easy (and it happens every day) for one to argue "Look! Clinton is clearly in the lead, she's got 60% of voters who are considering a vote for her, while Trump only has 20% of voters locked up! This race is already over!" Factual? Yes. Accurate? Not hardly. It's intellectual fraud, and it happens every day with nearly every statistic that you hear.

            While I acknowledge that our nation's saving rate is absurdly low, I don't believe that that 70% of our citizens would be desperately hard up for cash in emergencies (which happen every minute of every day for people across the country). Is the full truth likely still disconcerting? Almost certainly. But I doubt that it's truly THAT bad.

            Comment


            • #7
              people have no money and its not only here in the usa, its a worldwide credit based economy. people are working this week to pay for last week but the thing i find most amusing with americans is that they like to live like theyre making 2x what they really make.

              most everyone in the world doesnt have money but theyre not driving nice cars like americans, they live within theyre means not beyond theyre means like we do

              my cousins paycheck goes out as fast as is comes in to pay "bills" and im sure theres at least 7 out of 10 americans living the same way, he needs credit just to survive and that is a sad reality
              retired in 2009 at the age of 39 with less than 300K total net worth

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by kork13 View Post
                This is the single most destructive fact in any (nearly all) studies strewn about in the world, most especially here in the US. Statistics are constantly taken completely out of their context, and are almost always given whatever spin the researcher and/or the writer/reporter wants the data to convey. Research methods are also highly prejudiced, and commonly misconstrue the truth (such as by phrasing poll questions in a leading manner).

                We're in politics season... I think this problem becomes ever more clear right now. For example (using completely arbitrary, simple numbers)... Let's say polling shows that 20% of Americans strongly support Clinton, 20% strongly support Trump, 20% "lean" toward each one, and 20% are undecided or support another candidate.

                From that data, it would be extremely easy (and it happens every day) for one to argue "Look! Clinton is clearly in the lead, she's got 60% of voters who are considering a vote for her, while Trump only has 20% of voters locked up! This race is already over!" Factual? Yes. Accurate? Not hardly. It's intellectual fraud, and it happens every day with nearly every statistic that you hear.

                While I acknowledge that our nation's saving rate is absurdly low, I don't believe that that 70% of our citizens would be desperately hard up for cash in emergencies (which happen every minute of every day for people across the country). Is the full truth likely still disconcerting? Almost certainly. But I doubt that it's truly THAT bad.
                I agree 100%, especially with the statement in bold. Every day I see an anti-Trump headline that once you read the story and the "facts" or "quote" they are basing it on, it is pretty obvious to a free thinker that the headline is misleading. I find it infuriating and it is pretty sad considering he provides plenty of ammunition that doesn't require any misleading propaganda added.

                As for the OP, I agree with the consensus that these statistics are misleading but nevertheless still troubling.

                Comment


                • #9
                  It's actually pretty scary how many people live paycheck to paycheck. I've seen it first hand with employees who are pretty well paid. Have seen numerous occasions where they wanted to cash in their 401K to pay a large bill such as an insurance deductible, etc.

                  Sent a crew on a travel assignment awhile back. The company gets you to work and provides transportation, pays for all motel expenses, and provides a very reasonable daily stipend to cover meals, etc. while away from home. Reimbursement for this lags behind one week, so first week (several hundred dollars) comes out of pocket. Smart employees have no issue with this and actually save and make extra money by not using as much motel and meal $$ as is provided. In this case, I had several employees approach me beforehand wanting the company to front them money beforehand, as they had no savings, and apparently no credit to cover the expenses.

                  One guy bought a brand new vehicle last year as his family was taking a spring break vacation. Probably had no business spending the $$ on either, but they don't care. Saw that one year old vehicle the other day and it had a big dent in it. Asked him about it and he explains that they don't have the $1,000 deductible amount to get it fixed. Meanwhile, probably making monthly payments on it for 5+ years?

                  It's really pretty sad. You have families with good incomes that are complete financial disasters.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Fishindude77 View Post
                    Sent a crew on a travel assignment awhile back. The company gets you to work and provides transportation, pays for all motel expenses, and provides a very reasonable daily stipend to cover meals, etc. while away from home. Reimbursement for this lags behind one week, so first week (several hundred dollars) comes out of pocket. Smart employees have no issue with this and actually save and make extra money by not using as much motel and meal $$ as is provided. In this case, I had several employees approach me beforehand wanting the company to front them money beforehand, as they had no savings, and apparently no credit to cover the expenses.
                    My MIL used to work for a company that paid payroll every week. The owner wanted to switch to every other week, which is certainly a more typical arrangement and would reduce their payroll processing costs. So many employees complained that they wouldn't be able to manage going a week without a paycheck in that one transition week that the owner was forced to continue paying weekly. It is really sad that there are that many people out there who haven't figured out that they need to save something, anything, in case of emergencies.
                    Last edited by disneysteve; 10-10-2016, 05:35 AM.
                    Steve

                    * Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
                    * Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
                    * There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The reality is that the costs of housing and health care are out of control - wages just haven't caught up.
                      james.c.hendrickson@gmail.com
                      202.468.6043

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Reality is that before on one income you could buy a house, retire with a pension, send your kids to college, and be comfortable. Now you can't. And you are a lot harder pressed to do it without a college degree. But now that same college degree is 100x more expensive.

                        So it's a catch-22 for all levels of people. People who had "blue" collar jobs found it outsourced. They found that pensions went away and good jobs to raise a family tough to come by. "White" collar jobs where college became a requirement became so expensive that it's difficult to make it "worth" the value.

                        So now what?
                        LivingAlmostLarge Blog

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I think a lot of the problem is that more luxury items have become a regular necessity for a lot of people. Cable, internet, cell phone, heck even running the air conditioning all the time. My parents didn't have those bills. I remember sleeping in the basement on hot nights because my mom wouldn't always run the air. How many people today can't save because of these necessities taking up large portions of their paychecks?

                          I know people in my own family that spend a fortune on their families cell service, it's ridicules. There are cheaper options for everything but you know what, they take time to learn and research and people are too lazy for that(at least my people). It's easier to go to Verizon and just get on a plan and buy a phone instead of researching pre-paid.

                          Or even all the different tv viewing/streaming options. There are cheaper alternatives but it takes a little bit of work to figure out.

                          Now if you have the money for these things go for it. Like I tell my kids when you can afford an iphone and the service to go with it, you are welcome to take yourself up to the Verizon store and get it. But until then if you want a cell phone, this Tracfone Smart phone works just fine.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by james.hendrickson View Post
                            The reality is that the costs of housing and health care are out of control - wages just haven't caught up.
                            While there is some truth to this, it isn't why people have no savings.
                            Originally posted by LivingAlmostLarge View Post
                            Reality is that before on one income you could buy a house, retire with a pension, send your kids to college, and be comfortable. Now you can't. And you are a lot harder pressed to do it without a college degree. But now that same college degree is 100x more expensive.
                            Again, some truth to that but quite a bit of hyperbole, too. College is certainly not "100x" more expensive. My class just had our 30th reunion. Attending my alma mater today would cost you about 4.8 times what it cost when I graduated in 1986. That has risen faster than inflation, for sure, but there's also a lot more aid available. Probably fewer than 5% of students are actually paying sticker price. At my daughter's school, after scholarships and grants, she is paying about 60% of list price. Assuming the same were true at my undergrad college, that would mean today's cost would be less than 3x what I paid my senior year which really isn't so terrible 30 years later.

                            You're clearly right on the pension issue. No argument there.

                            "Be comfortable". What does that mean, exactly? I think Thrift-t addresses that nicely below.
                            Originally posted by Thrif-t View Post
                            I think a lot of the problem is that more luxury items have become a regular necessity for a lot of people. Cable, internet, cell phone, heck even running the air conditioning all the time. My parents didn't have those bills. I remember sleeping in the basement on hot nights because my mom wouldn't always run the air. How many people today can't save because of these necessities taking up large portions of their paychecks?
                            Bingo. We say this all the time. "Need" has taken on a much different meaning than it did not all that long ago. There are plenty of "necessities" that you can live without just fine if you really want to stretch your dollar. And houses are far bigger today than they were 30 or 50 years ago as we've discussed in other threads.

                            We keep hearing that 60-70% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. A significant chunk of that group does it by choice. It may not be a conscious choice but it's a situation they've put themselves in based on the lifestyle and spending decisions they've made and continue to make.
                            Steve

                            * Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
                            * Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
                            * There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by LivingAlmostLarge View Post
                              Reality is that before on one income you could buy a house, retire with a pension, send your kids to college, and be comfortable. Now you can't. And you are a lot harder pressed to do it without a college degree. But now that same college degree is 100x more expensive.

                              So it's a catch-22 for all levels of people. People who had "blue" collar jobs found it outsourced. They found that pensions went away and good jobs to raise a family tough to come by. "White" collar jobs where college became a requirement became so expensive that it's difficult to make it "worth" the value.

                              So now what?
                              Well, I don't agree with this. We have lived nearly 16 years on one income. We have been able to purchase a home. We expect my husband will have a pension, but if he doesn't make it 20 years we have retirement savings. And so far we have no college debt for our daughter after three semesters. Not sure she will leave debt free, but we have easily made it work to go to college.

                              There are plenty of trade jobs still available in this country. I saw a lot of them in our last town. Good money too! Don't knock the trades!
                              My other blog is Your Organized Friend.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X