I am currently taking a mortgage for 20 years, paying approximately $940 for 240 months. After some calculation, I found that total I must pay is about $230,000 in 20 years. however, using present value/future value, I estimate that the interest rate is roughly 4%. Is this a good investment?
Logging in...
Taking $97,800 mortgage for 20 years but the total amount I will pay is $230,000?
Collapse
X
-
Is it a good investment to pay $230K for a roughly 100K home? No, but you do need to live somewhere.
Can you handle a 15 year loan? 2.7% if you have good credit.
Editing:
I didn't have time earlier to look all of this up.
A $97,800 loan on a 30 year fixed at 4% has you paying a total of $70,288 in interest. That is not $230K, that is $168,088 over a 30 year span.
Over a 20 year span, it is $44,435 in interest, making the total $142,235.Last edited by dawnwes; 04-13-2016, 05:16 AM.
-
-
Is this for your own home to live in or for a rental property to generate income?Originally posted by clatoden99 View PostI am currently taking a mortgage for 20 years
Is this a good investment?
You own personal home is not an investment - it's your home.
If it's a rental property, you need to look at the overall numbers. Will the rent cover your costs? If not, how much will you need to spend each year to carry the property?Steve
* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Comment
-
-
I think the OP added property tax and home insurance into the equation if the interest is at 4% (and perhaps even PMI).
Another thing to think about is inflation. Sure the house is worth 97k today..but can you buy the same house in 20 years for 97k just due to inflation alone?
Also like what the other person said..you have to pay to live somewhere..can't be comparing this to living with your parents.
Comment
-
-
That makes more sense.Originally posted by Singuy View PostI think the OP added property tax and home insurance into the equation if the interest is at 4% (and perhaps even PMI).
$97,800 for 20 years at 4% is a payment of $592.65, not $940.Steve
* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Comment
-
-
It also illustrates what we often try to tell people when they say they need to buy a house because rent is "throwing money away". OP said the payment would be $940. The actual mortgage would only be $593. The other $347/month is for taxes, insurance, PMI maybe. And that doesn't count utilities, furnishings, maintenance, and repairs.Originally posted by Fishindude77 View PostGlad to see you are looking at the total cost over the life of the loan. Many folks just look at the monthly payment. This is a good illustration of how you can strap yourself into a situation where you are an slave to debt, with a huge amount of your income going to nothing but interest.
People look at one number - the rent payment vs. the mortgage payment and think owning a home is cheaper or about the same - but they don't look at the total costs involved in owning vs. renting.Steve
* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Comment
-
-
Purchasing a home will always be cheaper than renting. At the end of the mortgage you have an appreciating asset.Originally posted by disneysteve View Post
People look at one number - the rent payment vs. the mortgage payment and think owning a home is cheaper or about the same - but they don't look at the total costs involved in owning vs. renting.
With renting you never have an "end" so that money is in fact wasted.
As far as home maintenance, unless you bought the house from "the money pit" then you will STILL come out ahead in the end.Gunga galunga...gunga -- gunga galunga.
Comment
-
-
The fact that you are building equity is secondary. And if they end up selling in 5-7 years which is the average I think, there often isn't much if any appreciation.Originally posted by greenskeeper View PostPurchasing a home will always be cheaper than renting. At the end of the mortgage you have an appreciating asset.
A lot of people come here and say, "I'm paying $1,000 rent and that's what my mortgage would be so I can afford a house." They don't realize that their actual house expenses might be 30 or 40% higher than that mortgage payment. Sure they can afford $1,000 but can they afford $1,150 or $1,275, or $1,400? People end up house poor partially because they don't look at the overall cost of ownership.Steve
* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Comment
-
-
Not if you only live in the house for 3-5 years.Originally posted by greenskeeper View PostPurchasing a home will always be cheaper than renting. At the end of the mortgage you have an appreciating asset.
With renting you never have an "end" so that money is in fact wasted.
As far as home maintenance, unless you bought the house from "the money pit" then you will STILL come out ahead in the end.
Comment
-
-
Exactly. I've always said not to buy unless you intend to be there for at least 10 years.Originally posted by tomhole View PostNot if you only live in the house for 3-5 years.Steve
* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Comment
-
-
Only if you think being homeless is an adequate way to live.Originally posted by greenskeeper View PostPurchasing a home will always be cheaper than renting. At the end of the mortgage you have an appreciating asset.
With renting you never have an "end" so that money is in fact wasted.
As far as home maintenance, unless you bought the house from "the money pit" then you will STILL come out ahead in the end.
Comment
-
-
So the comparison is between renting with no taxes and insurance to buying?Originally posted by Singuy View PostI think the OP added property tax and home insurance into the equation if the interest is at 4% (and perhaps even PMI).
Another thing to think about is inflation. Sure the house is worth 97k today..but can you buy the same house in 20 years for 97k just due to inflation alone?
Also like what the other person said..you have to pay to live somewhere..can't be comparing this to living with your parents.
I know I put my taxes and insurance into my "what we can afford" but I would never include it in the total of what I have to pay for the house.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by tomhole View PostNot if you only live in the house for 3-5 years.Right and wrong. I'm thinking long term that after 30 years you'd own the house whereas renting you'd have nothing to show for it.Originally posted by disneysteve View PostExactly. I've always said not to buy unless you intend to be there for at least 10 years.
What if the person bought a house at the bottom of the housing market and sold 3 years later for a 50% profit?
Sure the less years you are in the house the bigger chance you take of losing money to renting. But the rent money each month is gone and never coming back.
Owning outright trumps renting, leasing, credit card financing, etc anything.Gunga galunga...gunga -- gunga galunga.
Comment
-

Comment