Originally posted by bennyhoff
View Post
However, considering that China is capable of making stuff and its large consumer base, it is imaginable that its economy can be self-sustaining (which seems to be the direction we are headed: build more factories, raise interest rates). Fake econ news or not, the fact is that China has a large population and has the technology to make stuff.
As for 08-09, I agree with you that our government make serious mistakes (e.g. the 100-week unemployment benefit --> if people are getting paid to not work, then there'll be less incentive to really find work). Even the mortgage bailouts (buying failed loans) probably damaged the robust return. And giving unbelievable high tax rebates (forogt the year, but it is completely unfair as the higher tax payers didn't get any) it like putting money China's pockets because the low-income people with poor financial management just goes and buys the next consumer electronics. Totally mismanaged the08-09 downturn; should have just let it ride it out.
So, in a way, we're headed back to a more government-managed economy with the trade and physical barriers that seem to talked about in the news. Based on history, isolated economy never seem to work out the in long run for any country. Since we are talking China, they isolated themselves for years (oh, wait, how about North Korea?); or even the Napoleon's continental system (and this was almost the entire relevant world as far as French thought).
Trade barriers works for the short term but it's got problems in the long term. When things are expensive, economic development slows. If my company has to pay $100 to develop a new product vs $50 today, we'll have 1/2 fewer new ideas each year tomorrow. But in the short term, the US has a far enough lead that things will look good.
Comment