I was recently promoted, and after my boss went over the new salary, he told me that my compensation index was around 80% for employees of my level.
That means I'm 80% below what the average salary of other employees at the same job level at our company make.
Before I got promoted, my compensation index was 96 (after getting the maximum raise for performance the previous year).
My boss said it was unfortunate and that they try to get every to 100% compensation ratio.
He said they would try to do what they could over the next few months to correct that.
Obviously, the squeaky wheel gets the oil. I'm sure if I don't raise this issue again, my next raise won't be until our annual raises.
How do I start this conversation with my bosses?
Besides being so far given a perfect performance grade from my supervisors and promoted rapidly, I'd like to begin to settle down and have a more quality life style.
That would require taking a mortgage, and the cost of real estate in Massachusetts is really not in line with reality, considering most of the houses here are well over 50 years old.
Is that a valid argument--that I want to be able to purchase a home, which is why I really need a compensation index closer to 100%?
That means I'm 80% below what the average salary of other employees at the same job level at our company make.
Before I got promoted, my compensation index was 96 (after getting the maximum raise for performance the previous year).
My boss said it was unfortunate and that they try to get every to 100% compensation ratio.
He said they would try to do what they could over the next few months to correct that.
Obviously, the squeaky wheel gets the oil. I'm sure if I don't raise this issue again, my next raise won't be until our annual raises.
How do I start this conversation with my bosses?
Besides being so far given a perfect performance grade from my supervisors and promoted rapidly, I'd like to begin to settle down and have a more quality life style.
That would require taking a mortgage, and the cost of real estate in Massachusetts is really not in line with reality, considering most of the houses here are well over 50 years old.
Is that a valid argument--that I want to be able to purchase a home, which is why I really need a compensation index closer to 100%?
Comment