If there's one core philosophy that we all preach on these forums (not to mention every professional financial advisor worth his salt), it's having a sufficient emergency fund. The definition of "sufficient" varies significantly from advisor to advisor and also with the individual's personal situation, but the numbers may range from anywhere between only $1,000 to potentially as much as a full year's income. The "typical" advice (broad usage of the word) is normally between 3-8 months' expenses.
[Enter devil's advocate, stage left]
"Wow... 3-8 months' expenses can be alot of money ($20k-$30k for an "average" household) just sitting around doing nothing but giving you peace of mind at night!"
[Exeunt]
So I recently thought about some of the times I've been tempted to tap into my EF in the past. My question to the fair ladies & gentlemen of SavingsAdvice©, How have you been tempted in the past to tap into your emergency fund? Did you do it then? Would you make the same decision today, or do you regret those choices?
(apologies for the tongue-in-cheek starter post
)
[Enter devil's advocate, stage left]

"Wow... 3-8 months' expenses can be alot of money ($20k-$30k for an "average" household) just sitting around doing nothing but giving you peace of mind at night!"
[Exeunt]
So I recently thought about some of the times I've been tempted to tap into my EF in the past. My question to the fair ladies & gentlemen of SavingsAdvice©, How have you been tempted in the past to tap into your emergency fund? Did you do it then? Would you make the same decision today, or do you regret those choices?
(apologies for the tongue-in-cheek starter post

Comment