Hi all, I honestly know nothing about personal finance or investing. All I know is to go to work and save as much money as possible in the bank. My parents and I are immigrants and after so many years we managed to save up several hundreds thousand dollars. We have no debts and are trying to figure out where best to park our money .
I am trying to educate myself on this matter and I am reading the book on the three-fund portfolio- a boglehead's style of investment. Many of you are probably familiar with it and I think it may be simple and conservative enough for a novice like me to get started.
I am trying to help my parents figure out and they want me to look into this annuity that pays 4.1% over 7 years (i know with fees and what not it will be less, just pretend like it is really 4.1%). I know comparing mutual fund and annuity is like apple and orange (insurance vs passive investment). but I am just wondering, giving $100,000 to start, is it reasonable to expect a simple portfolio like the three-fund to beat the 4.1% "guaranteed" rate of return in 7 years (from the brochure it is $132K after 7 years with the annuity). Of course the mutual fund has no "guaranteed" interest rate so I am just wondering what is the basis for people to decide?
I know I could ask this question in the boglehead's forum but from what I see I will get killed for being so uninformed. So I would appreciate if anybody is willing to help me understand the matter a little better. Of anything, money matter seems to be the hardest thing for me to wrap my head around! Many thanks!
I am trying to educate myself on this matter and I am reading the book on the three-fund portfolio- a boglehead's style of investment. Many of you are probably familiar with it and I think it may be simple and conservative enough for a novice like me to get started.
I am trying to help my parents figure out and they want me to look into this annuity that pays 4.1% over 7 years (i know with fees and what not it will be less, just pretend like it is really 4.1%). I know comparing mutual fund and annuity is like apple and orange (insurance vs passive investment). but I am just wondering, giving $100,000 to start, is it reasonable to expect a simple portfolio like the three-fund to beat the 4.1% "guaranteed" rate of return in 7 years (from the brochure it is $132K after 7 years with the annuity). Of course the mutual fund has no "guaranteed" interest rate so I am just wondering what is the basis for people to decide?
I know I could ask this question in the boglehead's forum but from what I see I will get killed for being so uninformed. So I would appreciate if anybody is willing to help me understand the matter a little better. Of anything, money matter seems to be the hardest thing for me to wrap my head around! Many thanks!

Comment