Here is another policy idea that's been getting some traction.
What does the SA forums community think about having the post office go back to Post Office Banking?
Basically the idea is: Postal Banking is basically provision of financial services by the Postal Service. This would be stuff like,non-profit and low-cost, consumer-driven products and services that could range from check cashing to bill payment to savings accounts to small-dollar loans. When the banking was first introduced in the 1960s, there were limits on balances and interest rates paid.
The advantages are:
1. Post offices are located in underserved rural and urban communities. These same communities often do have access to small dollar loans at competitive interest rates. In many cases the unbanked are also in these same neighborhoods and don't have access to cost effective banking services.
2. The Post Office badly needs a new source of revenue to remain solvent.
3. Banks such as Wells Fargo have recently been aggressive in their misconduct against consumers.
In the interests of a fair and full debate on this, the Federalist hates the idea. Here is the case for it, laid out in more detail.
What does the SA forums community think about having the post office go back to Post Office Banking?
Basically the idea is: Postal Banking is basically provision of financial services by the Postal Service. This would be stuff like,non-profit and low-cost, consumer-driven products and services that could range from check cashing to bill payment to savings accounts to small-dollar loans. When the banking was first introduced in the 1960s, there were limits on balances and interest rates paid.
The advantages are:
1. Post offices are located in underserved rural and urban communities. These same communities often do have access to small dollar loans at competitive interest rates. In many cases the unbanked are also in these same neighborhoods and don't have access to cost effective banking services.
2. The Post Office badly needs a new source of revenue to remain solvent.
3. Banks such as Wells Fargo have recently been aggressive in their misconduct against consumers.
In the interests of a fair and full debate on this, the Federalist hates the idea. Here is the case for it, laid out in more detail.
Comment