hidden costs

Hotels vs Timeshares: Why Hotels Are the Cheaper Option

August 28, 2020 By Kathryn Vercillo 7 Comments

When you’re looking at options for vacations, one of the debates that arises is hotels vs timeshares. They obviously both have their pros and cons. But most people mistakenly assume that timeshares are the better value. In reality, simply getting a hotel might be more cost-effective for you. It’s important to take this into consideration if you own – or are thinking about getting – a timeshare.

Why Do People Think Timeshares Are Cheaper?

One of the main selling points that timeshare representatives emphasize is that when it comes to hotels vs timeshares, timeshares are less expensive. This myth has persisted because the timeshare industry has worked very diligently to spread it. However, it’s not exactly true.

Remember that timeshare representatives are salespeople. Therefore, that’s exactly what they’re trying to do – sell you something. When they make their presentations, they do it in such a way that they are not always providing the most accurate information on how much it really costs to own a timeshare. In order to have a true understanding of the costs of hotels vs timeshares, you must first understand what costs are associated with timeshares that you do not have with hotels.

Hotels vs Timeshares: Initial Costs

Here is the biggest difference between hotel and timeshare costs: the purchase cost.

When you stay at a hotel, you don’t pay any upfront purchase costs. It’s as simple as that. You are going to pay for the nights that you are there. You are not going to pay for anything else.

With timeshares, you pay a huge upfront amount for the purchase. You typically pay at least $10,000 up front. You. might pay even more in initial costs.

Selling Your Timeshare

Of course, you might be about to argue – as a timeshare salesperson would – that you can recoup that money. After all, you can’t sell your hotel room down the line whereas you can sell your timeshare. But here’s what you need to realize: when you sell your timeshare you will most likely only be able to recover between 10% and 20% of what you paid. If you were able to recoup half of what you spent then you would be in a hugely lucky minority.

In other words, you’re going to lose anywhere from 50% to 90% of that initial upfront investment. That’s important to think about when it comes to the debate about hotels vs timeshares. And don’t forget that there will also be additional costs associated with selling a timeshare. You can hire a company to sell it, use a real estate agent, or try selling it yourself but each of these is associated with various fees.

Moreover, you must have the paperwork from the resort to sell your timeshare. Timeshare companies charge you for “document preparation” services which can cost anywhere between $250 and $500+. These document preparation services usually entail notifying the timeshare company of a change of ownership, drawing of a deed or contract, and obtaining a title. Luckily, a hotel never charges you any document or paperwork fees.

Financing Costs for Timeshares

If you keep your unit for 10 years and you initially pay $20,000 for it, then over a 10 year period, you’re paying $1,600 to $1,800 a year for the unit. That might not seem like a bad deal, but it’s only the initial cost. There are many others which will add to that price. One fo those is the cost that you pay to finance your timeshare.

Of course, if you have disposable income and can pay for the timeshare outright then this is a non-issue. But most people don’t do that. Most people get a loan to cover the timeshare. Often, these loans have high interest rates. They aren’t considered real estate loans. Instead, their rates are more comparable to credit card loans. Depending on your credit, that could end up being a very high cost. And depending on how long you take to pay off that loan, you could end up spending thousands more than the initial loan cost.

If you have to take out a loan to buy a timeshare then you almost certainly would do better financially with hotel stays.

5 Other Ways Timeshares Cost You Too Much Money

Here are some of the other ways that timeshares can end up costing you a lot of money (and therefore why you might want to just use hotels):

1. Hotels vs Timeshares: Costs for Non-Use

Most people who purchase a timeshare plan on being able to use it year after year on a regular basis. Unfortunately, as most of us can attest, things don’t always go as planned. Just think about all of the timeshares sitting empty during COVID-19 because people aren’t able to travel.

If you purchase a timeshare, there’s a high probability at some point during your ownership something will happen which prevents you from going on vacation that year. Unlike a hotel, even if you do not use your timeshare, you’re still responsible for paying all costs associated with it (i.e. maintenance and fees, which we’re about to explore further). When using a hotel, if you don’t go someplace one year, you don’t have to pay a dime to do so.

2. Costs for Upkeep

Whenever you buy timeshare, you will generally be charged yearly or monthly maintenance fees. These fees can vary according to the resort and timeshare purchased, but they generally run between $300 and $1,000+ per year. They can be even more expensive.

Unfortunately, you have to pay these fees regardless of whether or not you have actually used your timeshare each year. For some people, the upkeep costs are equivalent to what they would have spent on staying at a hotel for their vacation. Don’t forget that you’ve already paid a huge upfront fee in order to secure your unit, so this fee is added to the cost of that.

So, you’re paying that upkeep whether or not you travel. Plus you’re limited to traveling to only that one destination where your timeshare is located. Many people regret the decision to buy a timeshare. In fact, some reports indicate that as many as 85% of timeshare owners have regrets.

3. Exchange Fees

If you own a timeshare, then you may get tired of going to the same place every year. While this is easy to do when you stay at hotels, trying to exchange or swap your timeshare with someone else can be difficult and expensive. Most exchange companies that handle these transactions charge a fee, which can range anywhere from $100 per exchange to a percentage of the total price. And, that’s if you are even able to exchange. Often you need to do this months in advance, making last minute changes nearly impossible.

4. Repairs & Assessment Fees

Another aspect to consider is what happens when the property where your timeshare is located needs to be repaired or improved. Due to the fact that you don’t own the actual property, only your unit, the company which owns it can charge you an assessment fee for repair costs anytime they want. You don’t get a vote in the decision.

For most timeshare companies, this fee ranges from flat fees to a percentage of the total repair costs, and it must be paid immediately. For example, if a natural disaster occurred which caused a great deal of damage, then you could be charged thousands of dollars that are due immediately. On the other hand, you’ll never be charged any assessment fees or repair fees if a hotel that you stay at happens to be damaged or needs repairs. Heck, you might even get a refund if you’ve booked a hotel and they have to cancel due to damages.

5. Membership Costs

If you own a timeshare, and belong to a timeshare exchange company, then you are responsible for paying all membership fees. Timeshare exchange companies allow members to rent or exchange their timeshares amongst each other. Some timeshare exchange companies charge as little as $100 annually, but they can also charge significantly more.

The difference between owning a timeshare and using a hotel is that hotels will never charge you a membership fee. In fact, hotel memberships are usually free and allow the members to earn rewards when they use their hotel rooms.

Even though timeshare salespeople will lead you to believe that owning a timeshare is much less expensive than staying in a hotel, in the long run the fees associated with owning a timeshare are much more significant than what it would cost to stay in a hotel during your vacations. The best way to ensure you’re making an informed decision on whether or not you should purchase a timeshare is by understanding all of the fees and costs that comes with it.

Then it’s up to you to decide whether it is more cost-effective to purchase a timeshare or stay in a hotel. With hotels, all you have to do is pay for the cost of your stay and leave. There is certainly something to be said for that!

If you enjoy reading our blog posts and would like to try your hand at blogging, we have good news for you; you can do exactly that on Saving Advice. Just click here to get started. If you want to be able to customize your blog on your own domain and need hosting service, we recommend trying BlueHost. They offer powerful hosting services for $3.95/month!

Raising an Autistic Child Can Exceed $2 Million: What You Can Learn from This

June 10, 2014 By Jeffrey Strain 4 Comments

Study: raising an autistic child can be more than $2 million

Raising a child with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a challenge in the best of circumstances. ASD is classified as a neurodevelopmental disorder which can result in impaired social and communication abilities. It also often comes with a pattern of repetitive activities, behavior, or interests. ASD is currently considered the fastest growing developmental disability in the US according to the Autism Society, and it is estimated to affect one out of every 68 children.

Not only does an ASD child take an emotional toll on a family, but it can also take a huge financial toll. How much? Well over $1 million in the best case scenario, and as much is $2.4 million with children who have autism and combined with other associated disabilities according to a comprehensive analysis by USA and UK scientists in regard to the different costs which come from raising a child who has autism. These figures are much higher than previously thought, but also take into consideration the lifetime cost associated with the disorder since many who have ASD can never live fully on their own. The authors submitted an editorial on their findings and thoughts which was published online at JAMA Pediatrics.

The bulk of the costs (79%) accumulate from a variety of services which directly help the child. This includes such things as home healthcare, medical care, special education, and after school care which would be expected. What surprised the researchers was the amount of money the family ended up spending on indirect costs to help the child.

For example, 9% of the figures were attributed to the loss of wages and other parental income by family members who leave the workforce to become a caregiver to the child with autism. David Mandell, the senior author of the research, notes that it’s the indirect costs and consequences which aren’t discussed thoroughly enough when it comes to families with this disabilities.

As Mandell expressed, “One of the largest costs in childhood was lost parental earnings. We think this happens because parents have to drop out of the workforce to care for their children. They give up their jobs because of the struggle of advocating for and managing their child’s care becomes a full-time job. If we had more comprehensive, family friendly care in place, families wouldn’t be faced with this drop in income right when they’re incurring many more expenses.”

Even if you don’t have a family member with ASD, there is an important monetary revelation which you can take away from this study, and it can help you in a lot of ways with your own personal finances. When it comes to the actual cost of many things you buy, activities you do, or responsibilities you take on, the cost often goes beyond the amount of money you end up directly paying for it. Almost everything has hidden costs, and these hidden costs can be quite expensive if you don’t acknowledge they are part of what you’re spending.

(Photo courtesy of Allen Sheffield)

The Hidden Costs of Stay-At-Home Parenting

April 16, 2008 By Shannon Christman 13 Comments

Anyone who is seriously considering stay-at-home parenting is likely to have done the math. Most potential stay-at-home parents know how much they will have to cut their expenses to live on less than two full salaries. They have considered the financial effects of forgoing several years of career experience, and they are even likely to know how much they will save on work and daycare expenses. If you or your spouse is thinking about staying at home with the kids, it’s important to think about the financial changes you will experience.

When parents figure out if one of them can afford to stay home, one financial change is often missed in the calculations — the expenses that will increase as a result of staying home. They are few, but they can make a difference in a tight budget.

For one, the stay-at-home parent will lose out on any perks from his or her employer. I don’t mean just salary and benefits but also any meals covered by the company for lunch meetings, cell phones, discounts on the company’s products or services, and even take-home promotional items (t-shirts, mugs, pens) that you actually use and would be likely to buy if you had to.

Not only do you have to start paying for all the at-home parent’s lunches (if that person did, indeed, eat on the employer’s tab), but you will also have to pay for your children’s lunches. True, you are paying for lunch even if you send the kids to daycare, but lunches included in daycare expenses can be easily overlooked when making a stay-at-home budget. If your kids like to eat as much as mine do, the cost of five lunches at home (plus daytime snacks) can add a significant amount to your grocery bill.

Daycares also provide constant activities for children. When you stay home, you will be responsible for keeping your children busy. Many activities are free, but toddlers in particular have short attention spans, and you will have to find many, many different things for them to do each day. Even if you allow your children to watch more television than the experts recommend, you will need more toys, coloring books, and dress-up clothes than you would need if you only have to entertain your children on nights and weekends. A little creativity and some trips to yard sales will help keep these expenses down, but they are still likely to be higher than you might expect.

Though it sounds obvious, you must also remember that stay-at-home parents are home during the day. That means that your electricity, heating fuel, and water will be used more frequently. Utilities bills will be higher than they would be if the entire family was gone for eight or more hours each day. Not only are former members of the workforce home during the day, but so are the children. Children make a lot of messes, so you will have to buy more cleaning supplies. I clean our linoleum floors about five times as frequently as I did before I stayed home with my children, and the floors still look five times dirtier than they did pre-kids.

Finally, you may spend more on your car and gas by “staying home” than you ever did when you worked. In the 1950s, my mother stayed home with two small children while my father drove their only car to work, even though my family lived more than three miles outside a small town. As a stay-at-home parent in 2008, I can’t imagine actually staying home all day, every day. Our neighborhood is highly unwalkable (scoring 6 out of 100 at walkscore.com), so I use a good deal of gas running errands, taking my kids to the playground and storytimes, and heading to play dates. To be fair, it is probably less than I spent commuting. Some stay-at-home parents will see automotive expenses decrease, but others may see them increase. If you had been sharing a car with your spouse, you may even have to buy a second car to save your sanity.

Many couples mistakenly believe that they cannot afford for one parent to stay home with the children. The extra expenses listed here are real and should be included in a budget, but they are minor compared to the costs of working and daycare. In addition, many stay-at-home parents find that they develop skills that allow them to cut expenses even more than they had expected. Plus, the intangible rewards of giving a child more time with a parent, especially in the early years, should not be underestimated.

Image courtesy of TruShu