I saw a friend last night who is a little younger than me and has 2 daughters ages 7 and 5. She is also a physician (a specialist, not family practice like me). Her husband also works a good job so between the two of them, I'm sure they make 2-3 times what we make.
I was telling her about our college visits last week and of course the topic of cost came up. She asked if we've been putting money aside for our daughter. I said we have but it won't be nearly enough to pay the full cost. She mentioned that they have 32K saved for their older kid and somewhat less for their younger kid. I said I thought that was great since she is only 7. We didn't start saving for college until our kid was about 10 because until then I was busy paying off student loans. Her response was, "Oh, I'll be paying those until I'm 70."
While I'm sure she was exaggerating, the point is that she and her husband put saving for college first before repaying her student loans. My wife and I did just the opposite. I was determined not to still be paying for my own education when my daughter was getting hers. My loans had a 25-year repayment schedule so had I followed that, I would have not been done until 2018. My daughter starts college in 2014. As it is, I finished repayment in 2005.
I guess which method makes more sense would depend on the interest rate of the debt and the growth rate of the investments. If she has a low interest rate and has enjoyed the prolonged bull market of recent years, it's possible that she'll come out ahead as opposed to if she had done it my way. So I'm not saying that either way is necessarily right or wrong. I was just struck by the very different approaches we each took. My thought was to get out of debt first and then pour money into savings for a shorter period. Hers was to pay the minimum on the debt and put the remainder of available funds in savings over a longer period.
I don't really have a question or even a point here. Just thought I'd share this and see what folks thought.
I was telling her about our college visits last week and of course the topic of cost came up. She asked if we've been putting money aside for our daughter. I said we have but it won't be nearly enough to pay the full cost. She mentioned that they have 32K saved for their older kid and somewhat less for their younger kid. I said I thought that was great since she is only 7. We didn't start saving for college until our kid was about 10 because until then I was busy paying off student loans. Her response was, "Oh, I'll be paying those until I'm 70."
While I'm sure she was exaggerating, the point is that she and her husband put saving for college first before repaying her student loans. My wife and I did just the opposite. I was determined not to still be paying for my own education when my daughter was getting hers. My loans had a 25-year repayment schedule so had I followed that, I would have not been done until 2018. My daughter starts college in 2014. As it is, I finished repayment in 2005.
I guess which method makes more sense would depend on the interest rate of the debt and the growth rate of the investments. If she has a low interest rate and has enjoyed the prolonged bull market of recent years, it's possible that she'll come out ahead as opposed to if she had done it my way. So I'm not saying that either way is necessarily right or wrong. I was just struck by the very different approaches we each took. My thought was to get out of debt first and then pour money into savings for a shorter period. Hers was to pay the minimum on the debt and put the remainder of available funds in savings over a longer period.
I don't really have a question or even a point here. Just thought I'd share this and see what folks thought.
Comment