The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

Post BREXIT where you are in FIRE?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Stock up on gold so you can barter for chickens when the apocalypse happens.

    Still a long way away from retiring...couldnt care less. Actually I guess I did care considering I bought more shares at a discount yesterday and the day before...not much but I threw in $2500.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by tripods68 View Post
      2.1 Trillion in global wealth was erased Friday which they say was the worst than Financial Crises. DOW down another 300 right now. This week doesn't look pretty. More losses to come.

      We know BREXIT is a political move, not caused by financial markets. But the future of UK is looking more the "great depression" for them. Many companies that were looking to expand to UK now in questions. Near growth is non-existence.

      If you are looking to retire in the next 2-3 years, how are you approaching this news, and the affect in your retirements? If you are retired, are you hedging more towards bonds? Maybe you are not worried all, and why?


      https://www.theguardian.com/business...t-live-updates
      As of Friday, I am switching to part time. Call it semi-retirement if you wish.

      I haven't done anything in reaction to Brexit. With a well-diversified portfolio, bumps in the road are absorbed. If somebody can't stomach a 5% dip in their portfolio value, then they aren't ready to retire (or shouldn't be managing their own portfolio).
      Last edited by feh; 06-28-2016, 06:51 AM.
      seek knowledge, not answers
      personal finance

      Comment


      • #18
        Market is up 179--still below to make up huge hole from yesterday or last Friday.

        The silver lining--we'll be adding more shares towards retirements/investments this week (Wed & Thurs) at the lower price.
        Got debt?
        www.mo-moneyman.com

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by tripods68 View Post
          Market is up 179--still below to make up huge hole from yesterday or last Friday.

          The silver lining--we'll be adding more shares towards retirements/investments this week (Wed & Thurs) at the lower price.
          My next contributions & company match is on Thursday.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by tripods68 View Post
            Market is up 179--still below to make up huge hole from yesterday or last Friday.

            The silver lining--we'll be adding more shares towards retirements/investments this week (Wed & Thurs) at the lower price.
            I'm buying Friday. Money transfers to my brokerage account the 1st of every month.
            Brian

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by feh View Post
              As of Friday, I am switching to part time. Call it semi-retirement if you wish.
              Congrats! That's great.

              I'm not there yet but I'm hoping that my new job is the first step in that direction. It pays a lot more so I don't need to work as many hours to earn the same money. Right now, though, I'm working even more hours to earn as much as I can within reason for college costs and to pad the retirement accounts.
              Steve

              * Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
              * Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
              * There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.

              Comment


              • #22
                Still retiring in 20 years at 55. I sleep very well with 115-age of my portfolio in stock and the rest bonds.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by AJ444 View Post
                  115-age of my portfolio in stock and the rest bonds.
                  A typo somewhere?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Nutria View Post
                    A typo somewhere?
                    No???

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by AJ444 View Post
                      No???
                      Ok.

                      What does "115-age of my portfolio in stock and the rest bonds" mean?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Nutria View Post
                        Ok.

                        What does "115-age of my portfolio in stock and the rest bonds" mean?
                        Based on his post, 80% Stock & 20% Bonds

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by DaveInPgh View Post
                          Based on his post, 80% Stock & 20% Bonds
                          Jack Bogle famously recommended 100 minus your age in equities. Most folks over at bogleheads.org tend to be a little more aggressive than that, using 110/120 instead (at least during the accumulation phase).
                          Last edited by feh; 06-29-2016, 06:49 AM.
                          seek knowledge, not answers
                          personal finance

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by DaveInPgh View Post
                            Based on his post, 80% Stock & 20% Bonds
                            Yup, this. The plan is to continue on that path until a 50/50 allocation and then hold there.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Congratulations feh!
                              LivingAlmostLarge Blog

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by feh View Post
                                Jack Bogle famously recommended your 100 minus your age in equities. Most folks over at bogleheads.org tend to be a little more aggressive than that, using 110/120 instead (at least during the accumulation phase).
                                Ah. That's what he meant by 115-age! (I thought it was some garbled form of "percentage".)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X