The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

First Time Investor: 401K @ 23 Years Old

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • First Time Investor: 401K @ 23 Years Old

    Hello all,

    I've been doing a lot of research about my current 401k allocation. I have roughly $5,000 saved up so far, and was wondering if my current allocation is okay. I'm obviously a newcomer at the whole investing thing, and was wondering if someone had a better idea of what might be good for my age.

    My investment options are:

    Great-West Conserv Profile II Fund I
    Great-West Moderate Profile II Fund
    Great-West Aggressive Profile II Fund I
    American Funds Capital World G/I R3
    American Funds EuroPacific Growth R3
    MFS International Value R2
    Oppenheimer Developing Markets A
    Oppenheimer Global Fund A
    Great-West S&P SmallCap 600 Index Fund I
    Nuveen Small Cap Select A
    RidgeWorth Small Cap Growth Stock I
    Royce Total Return K
    Fidelity Advisor Leveraged Co Stk T
    Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund I
    Great-West T Rowe Price MidCap Gr Fund I
    Lord Abbett Value Opportunities A
    RidgeWorth Mid-Cap Value Equity I
    American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
    Columbia Diversified Equity Income A
    Great-West American Century Gr Fund I
    Great-West S&P 500 Index Fund I
    Great-West T. Rowe Price Eq Inc Fund I
    Invesco Van Kampen Comstock A
    Marsico Focus
    Great-West Bond Index Fund I
    Great-West Loomis Sayles Bond Fund I
    Great-West US Govt Mortgage Secur Fund I
    PIMCO Total Return Admin
    TD Ameritrade SDB Money Market
    TD Ameritrade SDB Securities
    Guaranteed Portfolio Fund


    And Currently, I am invested in the following:

    80% - Great-West Aggressive Profile II Fund I
    10% - Great-West Moderate Profile II Fund I
    10% - Oppenheimer Developing Markets A

    Just wondering if I should have this more spread out? If so, is there a recommendation for how exactly I should lay it out?

    I appreciate any and all help on the issue.

  • #2
    Great-West is a life insurance company, correct? That fact coupled with their "re-packaging" of other retail mutual funds screams "variable annuity" to me. If so, that is bad news for you. Packaging investments this way adds an additional layer of fees which you must pay.

    Do you have ticker symbols for the investment choices in your plan?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by RonnieBurgundy View Post
      Hello all,

      And Currently, I am invested in the following:

      80% - Great-West Aggressive Profile II Fund I
      10% - Great-West Moderate Profile II Fund I
      10% - Oppenheimer Developing Markets A

      Just wondering if I should have this more spread out? If so, is there a recommendation for how exactly I should lay it out?

      I appreciate any and all help on the issue.
      Those first two funds are each intended to be complete portfolios. So, by owning more than one you aren't adding any diversification, but you are somewhat decreasing the risk of the aggressive portfolio by mixing it with the moderate portfolio.

      The emerging markets fund may or may not be necessary, depending on what the other two portfolios hold. Or perhaps you are overweighting them on purpose? At your age, that is not an unreasonable thing to do.

      There are a lot of differing opinions as to what is the "best" asset allocation plan. The truth is that pretty much any reasonable plan will serve you well if you invest regularly, re-balance, and avoid trying to time the market. You also want to pay close attention to costs, as they reduce your return.

      You want to hold at minimum US stocks, foreign stocks, and US bonds. You want to be broadly diversified. Your Great-West portfolios accomplish both of these. You may wish to also hold REITS, Tips, and precious metals. Some like to "tilt" to value, or small value. Some like to overweight emerging markets (such as you are doing now).

      So in short, I think your asset allocation plan is fine as is unless there are more attractively priced choices available in your 401k plan (reason for the question about ticker symbols).

      And remember, you also have the option of opening your own IRA with the custodian of your choice.

      Comment


      • #4
        Predicting which fund will perform best is basically impossible, so simply save and diversify. Sounds like you are already doing that. You can also monitor expense ratios of the various options, and favor the lower cost ones. The higher the expense ratio, the more the fund operators are skimming off the top. Just a 0.5% difference in expense ratio over decades can add up to tens of thousands of dollars in the typical 401k.

        Comment

        Working...
        X