Originally posted by txex86
View Post
Logging in...
Got whacked by AMT
Collapse
X
-
Steve
* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
-
-
Originally posted by scfr View PostBut aren't there are options to bring the tax bill down that you choose not to partake in (solo 401k, SEP IRA, or something along those lines)?
I'll pass.
Comment
-
-
Hmm, I think the math still works in your favor deferring the tax.
Lets just say you invest the same index fund with pretax dollars or post tax dollars...assuming a 30% tax rate
You invest 1000/month pre tax or 700/month post tax.
Your money grow faster at 1000/month, making you 1.1million after 30 years@6.5% return.
The 700/month camp yield you 774k@6.5% after 30 years.
But then you have to deal with capital gaines tax at 15-2%(or whatever it'll be in 30 years)..on the growth in the post tax account. Also you paid taxes on all dividend throughout the 30 years @ your tax bracket %. In the pre-tax account, all dividend were reinvested tax free for the time being. Your growth is 520k out of the 774k in the post tax account, which will be subjected to capital gaines tax if you decide to sell the index funds.
So lets say you decided to take a lump sum of 1.1 mil out of your sep at age 59(which is the least efficient way to do so), you'll end up with 716k (single tax filer..you get more if you are married).
In the post tax camp, you'll end up with 696k.
I did not do the dividend tax advantage for the sep but it's another win for tax efficient account.
So at the end of the day, your tax efficient account(like a sep ira) is much better numbers wise even though you have to pay taxes when you start using it at a later date.Last edited by Singuy; 04-22-2017, 09:15 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Singuy View PostHmm, I think the math still works in your favor deferring the tax.
Lets just say you invest the same index fund with pretax dollars or post tax dollars...assuming a 30% tax rate
You invest 1000/month pre tax or 700/month post tax.
Your money grow faster at 1000/month, making you 1.1million after 30 years@6.5% return.
The 700/month camp yield you 774k@6.5% after 30 years.
But then you have to deal with capital gaines tax at 15-2%(or whatever it'll be in 30 years)..on the growth in the post tax account. Also you paid taxes on all dividend throughout the 30 years @ your tax bracket %. In the pre-tax account, all dividend were reinvested tax free for the time being. Your growth is 520k out of the 774k in the post tax account, which will be subjected to capital gaines tax if you decide to sell the index funds.
So lets say you decided to take a lump sum of 1.1 mil out of your sep at age 59(which is the least efficient way to do so), you'll end up with 716k (single tax filer..you get more if you are married).
In the post tax camp, you'll end up with 696k.
I did not do the dividend tax advantage for the sep but it's another win for tax efficient account.
So at the end of the day, your tax efficient account(like a sep ira) is much better numbers wise even though you have to pay taxes when you start using it at a later date.
I'll pass.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by PeggyHefferon View PostDoes anyone here actually think they will ever simplify the tax code?
I personally don't believe I will live to see that day. I have no confidence in our government fixing much of anything.Steve
* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Comment
-
Comment