At my office today, somebody went to use the hole punch and it jammed. The immediate response was to tell the person who orders supplies to get a new one. Nobody bothered to try and fix it. Nobody bothered to see if something had gotten stuck. Nobody bothered to try lubricating the spring. It's broken. Buy a new one.
Obviously, I didn't like that answer. When I had a break in my schedule, I took the hole punch, grabbed a hammer and screwdriver, and unjammed the stuck part. I worked it up and down a few times. I want to grease it a bit but need to bring in some WD-40 from home, but even without that, it is working again just fine. It took me less than 5 minutes and no advanced mechanical knowledge and saved us from trashing a perfectly good item and spending $15 or so to buy a new one.
It just boggles my mind how wasteful people are both with stuff and with money.
Obviously, I didn't like that answer. When I had a break in my schedule, I took the hole punch, grabbed a hammer and screwdriver, and unjammed the stuck part. I worked it up and down a few times. I want to grease it a bit but need to bring in some WD-40 from home, but even without that, it is working again just fine. It took me less than 5 minutes and no advanced mechanical knowledge and saved us from trashing a perfectly good item and spending $15 or so to buy a new one.
It just boggles my mind how wasteful people are both with stuff and with money.

) The ethic about waste in the workplace, like all workplace ethics, is crafted by management. Management in the US has generally become increasingly penny-wise and pound-foolish, or more generally, short-sighted. An example: When I got here, there were two people in IT. One of them was actually the handyman, which often involved assisting the hardcore IT guy with running conduit and such. But if a florescent light went out, this handy guy took care of it. If there was a broken desk drawer that didn't operate well, this handy guy would fix it. And so on. Money got tight, and they let the second guy in IT go. His contributions to keeping this place working well and efficiently using the company's resources were undervalued by management, sacrificed in favor of showing a bit better bottom-line. Now, in our case, the rest of us do kick in and fill the gap as we can, and I wholeheartedly support that concept, but I also see why some view management's failure in properly valuing the contributions of the second IT guy as projecting a message that waste is acceptable and proper, here. More over, it is management's responsibility to set the tone - not to tell people that they need to fix their own desk drawers - that's unreasonable - but rather to have a mechanism in place for registering problems to be fixed, rather than "buying new", if that is the ethic that they want to prevail in the workplace. They don't do this, I suspect, because they don't want a long queue of things to be fixed to make it so clear that they haven't adequately resourced the operation. The accountability, in the workplace, for fixing things must be placed on management, though, not people who were hired to do bookkeeping, writing documentation, or selling things.
Comment