Re: Dave Ramsey and zero credit score?
I'd like to join the minority group as well. You can have the best of both worlds. Sure, the FICO score has been somewhat forced upon us, but we can stick our head in the sand and complain it's a "dumb system" or we can play it right, save money, get a great rate on a 15-year-fixed-mortgage-that's-no-more-than-25%-of-our-take-home, and never carry any revolving debt at all.
It's true they want you paying them interest, but you don't have to. Again, you can have the best of both worlds.
Let's remember that Dave fought these exact people he hates now for 2 years before he lost everything. He was sued, sued, sued, foreclosed on, sued, harrassed, etc. by lenders of every sort. He had mounds of debt and hoards of creditors coming after him. I've no doubt they were nasty to him.
This is the (extreme) perspective he is coming from when he gives advice. His situation was extreme (millions in debt) and his perspective his extreme. It always will be. I feel there's a middle ground in there ('best of both worlds') that should be encouraged.
I'd like to join the minority group as well. You can have the best of both worlds. Sure, the FICO score has been somewhat forced upon us, but we can stick our head in the sand and complain it's a "dumb system" or we can play it right, save money, get a great rate on a 15-year-fixed-mortgage-that's-no-more-than-25%-of-our-take-home, and never carry any revolving debt at all.
The whole credit system seems skewed to encourage people to have payments for everything (house, car, college, braces, TV, dog, new pool, vet bills.....). It fits in nicely with the instant gratification generation.
Let's remember that Dave fought these exact people he hates now for 2 years before he lost everything. He was sued, sued, sued, foreclosed on, sued, harrassed, etc. by lenders of every sort. He had mounds of debt and hoards of creditors coming after him. I've no doubt they were nasty to him.
This is the (extreme) perspective he is coming from when he gives advice. His situation was extreme (millions in debt) and his perspective his extreme. It always will be. I feel there's a middle ground in there ('best of both worlds') that should be encouraged.

. It's a bad system; rolling over and taking is a stupid thing to do. The hegemony of the FICO score has only arisen since the 1990s; in fact, when I entered college in the early 1990s I'd never even HEARD of a "credit score," except in vague terms concerning mortgages in my high school economics class.
I have no problem, on the face of it, with FICO as an indicator of finacial responsibility. But I find it laughable that someone can be SO well off that they have no FICO score, and be punished for it. What a lazy underwriter or loan officer that must be, who's willing to look at one number but not a person's whole financial profile!
Comment