Last year, oddly enough exactly one year ago today, I posted this thread. I wanted to update this situation and get opinions on a problem that cropped up.
EEinNJ is the winner for finding the flaw in the plan:
Major flaw? No Job= Not Qualifying for a mortgage. At least, that's the way it used to be, and I hear lenders are going back to that.
He contacted a mortgage broker in Florida, where he will be moving, and laid out his situation. The broker said he couldn't help him. The mortgage company wouldn't make a loan to someone without seeing documentation of a 3-month income stream. My cousin called a second place and got the same answer.
The suggestion that came up was to take a distribution from his retirement plan for November, December and January. That would provide the needed documented income. The problem with that is that he is only 55 and would have to pay the early withdrawal penalty to do that. If he takes out $3,000/month for 3 months, that means paying a $900 penalty.
He has plenty of assets and finds it ridiculous that he can't get a mortgage based on his personal wealth. I said that he needs to find a lender that will do manual underwriting rather than just a cookbook denial. If he can sit down with an intelligent human being and show how much money he has, I can't imagine him not being able to borrow 150K for 5 years.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
Comment