I am rather pro-home ownership, and it can make much more sense than renting. (If renting is comparable, tax breaks will give owning an edge. Condos are generally pretty low maintenance, 90% of the time - you always hear of special assessments, etc., but more likely than not it is a far more affordable option than owning a home).
That being said, I wouldn't BUY anything I only planned on to live in 3 years.
In certain markets this may make sense (if you buy a condo until you can afford more, which seems to be your goal). It really depends on the market. But I think beyond extremely expensive and competitive markets, it probably makes little sense.
If you could rent and save the down payment on a home in 3 years, I would just rent. I would only own for 3 years if it gave me a significant edge. (i.e. we owned a condo for 2 years - planned to stay longer originally - BUT it cost 50% of rent on the same apartment. There was a clear and significant edge. The market was so expensive that condos appreciated faster than single family homes, at the time. These are reasons to buy a condo. I am not convinced I would buy a condo in your shoes, though).
That being said, I wouldn't BUY anything I only planned on to live in 3 years.
In certain markets this may make sense (if you buy a condo until you can afford more, which seems to be your goal). It really depends on the market. But I think beyond extremely expensive and competitive markets, it probably makes little sense.
If you could rent and save the down payment on a home in 3 years, I would just rent. I would only own for 3 years if it gave me a significant edge. (i.e. we owned a condo for 2 years - planned to stay longer originally - BUT it cost 50% of rent on the same apartment. There was a clear and significant edge. The market was so expensive that condos appreciated faster than single family homes, at the time. These are reasons to buy a condo. I am not convinced I would buy a condo in your shoes, though).

Comment