Guys, look at this. The article is rather old, but the very last part is troublesome.
Authorized Users: Any Credit Risk? Any Benefit?
Apparently CC companies can interpret and make their own rules.... so, what one CC company does, may not necessarily happen with another. Rules were not consistent even back in 2003.
I thought the fact as to whether or not an a SSN has been provided was the key factor.
I'm not sure how FICO would work without that SSN as an identifier. There are common names and just by the name being on a account, I'm not sure how a name could be linked to a FICO score without the SSN as the identifier???
Authorized Users: Any Credit Risk? Any Benefit?
Apparently CC companies can interpret and make their own rules.... so, what one CC company does, may not necessarily happen with another. Rules were not consistent even back in 2003.
I thought the fact as to whether or not an a SSN has been provided was the key factor.
I'm not sure how FICO would work without that SSN as an identifier. There are common names and just by the name being on a account, I'm not sure how a name could be linked to a FICO score without the SSN as the identifier???
Comment