So Saturday my cell phone starts going on the fritz, randomly shutting off, droping calls, contact service error etc. Now I rely on my phone alot, for 1) My gf is going to school outa state. We talk for free because we have the same cell phone carrier. 2) I am "on call" this week for my work, and having a cell phone makes my life a ton easier. 3) I am Duplex/house hunting and my cell phone is my call back number.
Anyways, my purchase was a cell phone. The past two months, I've thought it'd be cool to get a new cell phone, as mine was about 14 months old. And t-mobile would give me a deal and/or free phone if I resubscribed for 1-2 years depending on phone etc. Eventually I decided that, I didn't need a new phone, and locking in another year or two wasn't the smartest, because me and the gf were talking about getting a new phone plan to save money in the future.
Well I end up buying THE phone I was looking for, but t-mobile didnt carry anymore ( They also didn't carry it when I was looking 2 months ago) So I did pay more but i got the phone I actually was searching for.MOTOROLA PEBL U6 ORANGE UNLOCKED T-MOBILE/CINGULAR NEW! - (item 320138577019 end time Jul-21-07 16:58:39 PDT)
I end up spending roughly $170 for the phone I wanted... But I feel like if I would have given into my impulse a month or two ago, I would have actually saved money.
Does this happen to others, something becomes a necessary replacement, and you go overboard with spending?
The same thing happened to my subwoofers in my car. They gave up the ghost about 6 months ago. I went without. Until I missed them enough that I decided I wanted to replace them. I figured it's about the only item that I continually enjoyed for 7 years(how long I had and used them) and that it'd be a worthy item for me to buy.
I then liquidated some other fun items on ebay. And ended up spending 1100 on subs and a new amp etc. When I could have gone a cheaper route.
It seems like I've mastered the I can live without that attitude. However when something I am living with breaks, I end up upgrading. I can remember doing it for computers, bikes, cars etc. I am always in a better financial situation than I was when i got the item before.
Is this seen as a bad practice or justified because the money is spent on well used items that are only being replaced due to wearing them out?
Anyways, my purchase was a cell phone. The past two months, I've thought it'd be cool to get a new cell phone, as mine was about 14 months old. And t-mobile would give me a deal and/or free phone if I resubscribed for 1-2 years depending on phone etc. Eventually I decided that, I didn't need a new phone, and locking in another year or two wasn't the smartest, because me and the gf were talking about getting a new phone plan to save money in the future.
Well I end up buying THE phone I was looking for, but t-mobile didnt carry anymore ( They also didn't carry it when I was looking 2 months ago) So I did pay more but i got the phone I actually was searching for.MOTOROLA PEBL U6 ORANGE UNLOCKED T-MOBILE/CINGULAR NEW! - (item 320138577019 end time Jul-21-07 16:58:39 PDT)
I end up spending roughly $170 for the phone I wanted... But I feel like if I would have given into my impulse a month or two ago, I would have actually saved money.
Does this happen to others, something becomes a necessary replacement, and you go overboard with spending?
The same thing happened to my subwoofers in my car. They gave up the ghost about 6 months ago. I went without. Until I missed them enough that I decided I wanted to replace them. I figured it's about the only item that I continually enjoyed for 7 years(how long I had and used them) and that it'd be a worthy item for me to buy.
I then liquidated some other fun items on ebay. And ended up spending 1100 on subs and a new amp etc. When I could have gone a cheaper route.
It seems like I've mastered the I can live without that attitude. However when something I am living with breaks, I end up upgrading. I can remember doing it for computers, bikes, cars etc. I am always in a better financial situation than I was when i got the item before.
Is this seen as a bad practice or justified because the money is spent on well used items that are only being replaced due to wearing them out?
Comment