The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

Would you buy this rental property?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Would you buy this rental property?

    I know that you’re using 6.5%, 30 yr mortgage for your calculation. But, if it’s an investment property, nobody will give you 6.5%, 30 yr mortgage. The rate you’ll get will be 1.5% to 2.5% more then an owner occupied rate. If you’re lucky, you’ll get 7.5%. But, for this purpose, I’ll assume 8%. Assuming you put 20% down, you’re monthly mortgage will be $322.27.

    Because I don’t have other, real numbers, I’ll use the numbers other people quoted (except for the mortgage above):

    Mortgage $322.27
    Taxes/Insurance $100.00
    Discounts for lawn, etc. $25.00
    Avg. Monthly Utilities $300.00
    Total Expense: $747.27

    All of these things should be known before you buy. If you don’t know, or can’t find out with 100% certainty, don’t do it. Never walk into a business deal partially blind. It’s that little thing you don’t know that will kill you.

    If you had no tenants, could you afford to pay $747.27/month to cover your expenses?

    You really need to base your occupancy on 11 months of the year*. Tenants move out, you have to fix up, repaint, etc., and then find new tenants. This typically takes a month. So, multiply $747.27 by 12 and divide by 11. That’s $815.20/month. $815.20/month is how much you’d have to receive in rent to just cover your KNOWN expenses.

    If you collect $850/month and your expenses are $815.20/month you are left with less then $34.80/month.

    What is your annual rate of return with $34.80/month?

    Your initial investment is 20% down, $10,980. But, you also have to add in your closing costs. What will that be? For the sake of argument, let’s assume its $2500. So, your total initial investment is $13,480. Your annual net will be $382.80 ($34.80 x 11months*). That leaves your rate of return at 2.84% (382.80 / 13480).

    *Remember, you lose 1 month for do to turnover. If you don’t have turnover, then you can count that as an added bonus at the end of the year. However, as a business rule, you should always figure in the lost revenue due to turnover.

    And then, of course, are the UNKNOWN expenses. What will they be? Will $34.80/month cover that? I highly doubt it. And let’s assume that you fix everything. 1 phone call a month to fix one small problem probably isn’t even worth your time at $34.80. $34.80 probably isn’t even worth the paperwork and the headaches. A part time job paying $6/hour for 6 hours a month would pay more.

    You’re rate of return would be horrible. 2.84% is below the rate of inflation. Leaving your money in CD’s would be better.
    Now, some could argue that in the long run it may be worth it. This may be true, but is it worth finding out? In my opinion, I’d say no.

    If you want to become a landlord, keep looking, eventually you’ll find one that’ll work in your favor. My friend finds properties and rents them out. He typically will look at 500 properties before he’ll find one that is worth it. And then ½ the time it still doesn’t work out. But the ones that do are paying very well. As a general rule, he says don’t take anything that nets less then $500/month. One thing can go wrong and eat up that $500/month faster then you know it.

    I think in two years, mid-2008, you’ll see the market flooded with good deals. So for now, I’m keeping my money in the bank and waiting until then.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Would you buy this rental property?

      I found a better way to make money is to buy land. I bought 5 acres for $20,000 in Florida. I put it up for sale and got $35,000 on it. I held the mortgage and made 8% interest in it for several years. I stipulated that no trees could be cut except for clearing of the house. They made payments for several years and then paid me off in full.
      I would rather take a chance on land than a rental property!
      I soldmy last one for $14,000 at an auction. I paid 35,000 for it in the 1980's!

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Would you buy this rental property?

        I did the rental property thing for a couple of years and was immediately grossing 27% of purchase price in rent without paying for any utilities and I still thought it wasn't worth it. You get lots of turnover and your dealing with higher risk people who simply don't care about the property.

        If you think the price of the property is low with a high chance for a nice capital gain move into it live there for two years then sell it. It would then be classified as a tax free transaction.

        Also is it by chance this rental unit is in Milwaukee?

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Would you buy this rental property?

          Originally posted by JBinKC
          Also is it by chance this rental unit is in Milwaukee?
          Stevens Point WI

          I have a friend who built (yes actually swung the hammer) his house. He did have people come in and do the electrical, plumbing, drywall, etc. Basically anything you can see. His house appraised at 75k over his cost. We talked about them selling in 2 years for the tax free income. Well his wife said she did not want to do that. It just was not worth it to her. Well 2 yrs later his house is now almost 100k of profit potential and as a teacher he really, really, really wants to sell it and do it again while he was off this summer...no go said the wife.

          If I had a better back I would do it myself. Physically I could not handle the work. Financially, I could see doing it.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Would you buy this rental property?

            I own three rental properties I had bought between 1995 and 2000, and they have been best investments as all of them more than tripled from my purchase prices. When I bought them, though, all of them were cash flow negative or break even at best. During the 90's housing prices were still depressed and people called me crazy for investing in real estate and sellers were basically begging me to take their properties off their hands. But that is what contrarian investment is all about.

            In any case, current cash flow is not as important as the location of the property and the outlook of real estate market. Cash flow will eventually catch up. You want to purchase properties in best neighborhood you can afford and get the best agent in town to get the tenants for you. Last thing you need is a deadbeat tenant who will run your place down and not pay agreed rent. Typically, people who look to live in nice part of town have the means and know the importance of paying their bills. RE agent should run credit and employment checks before presenting them for you to consider. My agent does this very well and I have not had one single problem with any of my tenants. As matter of fact, one tenant made improvements to the property and when she moved out, insisted she will paint and renovate the place as she wants to leave it “in original move-in condition”. But after she moved out, I found out she had installed brand new light fixtures and made other small enhancements to the property.

            Over the past 10 years, all I had to do was change three refrigerators, one electric heater (wall attached) and paint half dozen times. Market is obviously important because what you make from appreciation of property will be much more than few bucks you make off rent payments.

            I have some concerns about your idea, though. First, the market has topped and is on decline. In NY region, between the peak of the market in late 80s to trough of mid 90s, the market fell about 30%. Secondly, you have not done any due diligence on the tenant. As B4 said, you need to verify that tenants are any good.

            I would wait 4-5 years for markets to come down before considering rental property investment.

            Comment

            Working...
            X