The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

The rich are betting they can buy their way to a longer life

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The rich are betting they can buy their way to a longer life

    The rich are betting they can buy their way to a longer life



    Ben Steverman, Bloomberg • April 22, 2018 7:57 am

    Money might not buy love, but it can buy better health. And, to live as long as possible, the world’s wealthy are willing to pay up.

    Over the past few decades, the average person’s lifespan has risen almost everywhere in the world. In China, the U.S. and most of Eastern Europe, the average life expectancy at birth has reached the late 70s, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD. People in Western Europe and Japan, meanwhile, can expect to live into their early 80s.

    Most rich people, however, are counting on living even longer — a lot longer, as in two decades more than average. In a new UBS Financial Services survey, 53 percent of wealthy investors said they expected to live to 100.

    Hitting triple digits won’t be easy, but it’s not as outlandish as it used to be. The average Japanese woman now has a life expectancy of 87, OECD data show, compared with 81 years for men. And many studies have shown that the wealthy have a built-in longevity advantage.

    In the U.S., for example, the richest 1 percent of American women by income live more than 10 years longer than the poorest 1 percent, a 2016 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found. For men, the gap between the richest and poorest Americans is almost 15 years.

    The rich also seem to know that living to 100 is a pricey prospect, one that requires more spending on health care, better food, exercise and other services that can lengthen life. Also, you have to keep paying for everything that comes from hanging around additional decades. In the UBS survey, which focused on people with more than $1 million in investable assets, 91 percent said they’re “making financial changes due to increased life expectancy.” Even the wealthy worry about rising health care costs, the survey suggests.

    The rich are more than willing to sacrifice money for extra longevity. Nine of 10 wealthy people agreed that “health is more important than wealth.” Asked by UBS how much of their fortune they’d be willing to give up “to guarantee an extra 10 years of healthy life,” the average responses varied by wealth level.

    Investors who are barely millionaires, with $1 million to $2 million in net worth, were willing to give up a third of their nest egg for an additional decade of life. Investors with more than $50 million were willing to part with almost half of their fortune.

    The world’s trend toward longer life has featured an exception in recent years. The life expectancy of Americans has declined for two years in a row, an anomaly that can be blamed in part on the country’s opioid abuse crisis. But even before U.S. lifespans started slipping because of drug use, health and longevity statistics significantly lagged those of other wealthy countries in Western Europe and Asia.

    Perhaps it’s not surprising, then, that rich Americans surveyed by UBS had different attitudes from the wealthy elsewhere in the world — they were more pessimistic about making it to age 100. Just 30 percent of the American rich expect to hit the century mark. While they were the most worried about rising health care costs, they were the least likely to be adjusting their finances for the prospect of living longer.

    If rich Americans aren’t planning for the extra costs of longevity, they could be making a mistake. Studies show that the wealthy in the U.S. are increasingly insulated from the depressing health trends afflicting most Americans. A 2016 study by University of California at Berkeley professors Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman compared the death rates for American men aged 65 to 79 across several decades by wealth. If these men’s wealth placed them in the top 1 percent, their mortality rates in the early 1980s were 12 percent lower than average. Twenty-five years later, the wealthiest American men’s death rates had plunged to 40 percent below average.

    Rising inequality is about more than just a widening gap in wealth and income. The richest Americans are also living much longer, healthier lives than everyone else.
    james.c.hendrickson@gmail.com
    202.468.6043

  • #2
    In a new UBS Financial Services survey, 53 percent of wealthy investors said they expected to live to 100.

    It would be interesting to see how this survey question was phrased (if it was a survey question and not derived from some other source). There is a difference between--how long do you want your resources to last and how long do you expect to live.
    Every time I do one of those monte carlo type calculations I put in age 100 for both DH and I because it would really suck if we both did live to 100, but the money ran out at 81. Realistically, the longevity tables don't give very good odds that both of us would even live to 90.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Like2Plan View Post
      In a new UBS Financial Services survey, 53 percent of wealthy investors said they expected to live to 100.

      It would be interesting to see how this survey question was phrased (if it was a survey question and not derived from some other source). There is a difference between--how long do you want your resources to last and how long do you expect to live.
      Every time I do one of those monte carlo type calculations I put in age 100 for both DH and I because it would really suck if we both did live to 100, but the money ran out at 81. Realistically, the longevity tables don't give very good odds that both of us would even live to 90.

      I was thinking the same thing. Planning on living to 100 is different that expecting to live to 100.

      Now that we have extra money, I spend more on higher quality food. People trying to pay off debt tend to buy the cheapest food they can, which usually comes in the form of processed foods. Not a lot of people like eating beans and rice. I'm able to stay at home, so I walk and exercise more than someone that works 12 hr shifts. I'm able to go to the doctor and buy all the medicine I need. I buy supplements and pricey exercise equipment. If I didn't already have hereditary health problems, I would be PO'd if I wasn't healthier than someone that didn't have time to exercise and ate off the dollar menu on their way to their second job. If that is "buying my way", I'm unapologetic about it. A better life is the only reason why I worked so hard to get out of poverty.

      Comment


      • #4
        Part of this may also be that people with higher levels of wealth and income can afford better medical care. They also tend to have higher levels of education and accordingly have better health behaviors.
        james.c.hendrickson@gmail.com
        202.468.6043

        Comment


        • #5
          I consider this a click-bait type thing with such inflammatory headlines.

          "The rich are betting they can buy their way to a longer life" How can this reporter know the state of mind of "the rich"?

          Later on the article says, "If rich Americans aren’t planning for the extra costs of longevity, they could be making a mistake. " Wait a second--the headline said, "The rich are betting they can buy their way to a longer life"

          It seems like a lot of folks (rich or poor) would be able to extend their life span by not getting caught up in the opioid abuse. Maybe that should be the take away here. "The life expectancy of Americans has declined for two years in a row, an anomaly that can be blamed in part on the country’s opioid abuse crisis. " That is huge--that it moves the statistical averages.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by james.hendrickson View Post
            Part of this may also be that people with higher levels of wealth and income can afford better medical care. They also tend to have higher levels of education and accordingly have better health behaviors.
            Perhaps education has a bearing on it.




            Nicotine is a terrible drug and terribly addictive. (Personally, I'm tickled that we have seen the smoking rates go down. I'd love to see it go lower.)

            But, I will tell you that just because you have a couple of bucks and have more food choices, doesn't make you skinny.

            "Obesity and Socioeconomic Status in Adults: United States, 2005–2008
            Key findings
            Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2008

            Among men, obesity prevalence is generally similar at all income levels, however, among non-Hispanic black and Mexican-American men those with higher income are more likely to be obese than those with low income.

            Higher income women are less likely to be obese than low income women, but most obese women are not low income.

            There is no significant trend between obesity and education among men. Among women, however, there is a trend, those with college degrees are less likely to be obese compared with less educated women.

            Between 1988–1994 and 2007–2008 the prevalence of obesity increased in adults at all income and education levels."


            Obesity and Socioeconomic Status in Adults: United States, 2005–2008

            Comment

            Working...
            X