Just wondering how many of us here are either in this financial demographic, or striving to reach it?
Logging in...
Poll: > $100k in income, > $1M in invesments?
Collapse
X
-
Poll: > $100k in income, > $1M in invesments?
47I'm there now.8.51%4Not there yet, but on track to reach $1M within 10-15 years48.94%23My income is unlikely to reach $100k, but I'm still striving for $1M or more by retirement.29.79%14Living on a lot less than $100k now, $250k to $500k will be plenty for my retirement.4.26%2Other8.51%4Tags: None
-
-
Dh and I will probably never come close to $100k combined (I think our best year, with us both working FT, was about $60k), but we'd still like to reach $1 million by retirement. We've got about $40k in our Roths (never had access to a 401k in any of our jobs) at age 30 - still a long way to go, but a lot of time left too.
-
-
I think home equity doesn't belong in investments unless currently you've got a very expensive house (and probably live in the expensive area) and plan to downsize by retirement. In that case I'd take as an estimated difference which would be contributed to the investments later. Or another case if you plan to use your home equity to obtain a reverse mortgage.
Just my 2 cents.Last edited by aida2003; 02-27-2008, 05:01 AM.
Comment
-
-
Not there, though have been on 2 incomes.
I expect to reach six figures in the future again, even on one income. By the time I am 40. Of course, the other side of the coin is I will probably switch to part time then. So, maybe not. Right now I don't really see the point of working for much more than $100k (today and today's dollars anyway). I mean I could quit my job and go all out and find a six figure job today, but I wouldn't be happy.
As far as $1 mil, we need a hell of a lot more than $1 mil to retire. (Considering inflation and longevity, etc., etc.)
$1 mil? Around age 45-50 I would guess. At our current rate. This may speed up considerably if spouse returns to work. Goal for retirement is more like $5 mil.
Comment
-
-
We are a single income household making far less than $100K. We should be able to retire with more than $1m in liquid assets- that's with no inheritance (which may not exist anyway). Unfortunately we have and will save a ridiculous percentage of our income in order to achieve that end result. It will be easier in just a few years when our house is paid off.
Comment
-
-
I'm there as far as income - have been for over 12 years, but I'm still quite a while from the $1 million in investments. I expect to be there in my early 50s and double that again and more by retirement.Steve
* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by disneysteve View PostI'm there as far as income - have been for over 12 years, but I'm still quite a while from the $1 million in investments. I expect to be there in my early 50s and double that again and more by retirement.
Comment
-
-
-
For those who are including the value of their home, remember to just count equity, not total value. If you have a $300,000 house but a $250,000 mortgage, don't add $300,000 to your net worth.Steve
* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by disneysteve View PostFor those who are including the value of their home, remember to just count equity, not total value. If you have a $300,000 house but a $250,000 mortgage, don't add $300,000 to your net worth.Last edited by Snave; 02-27-2008, 02:27 PM.
Comment
-
Comment