The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

Fund screener

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fund screener

    The indexing vs active management discussion got me looking for fund screeners, some interesting things I found:

    Searching for Large Cap Blend

    I used MS Money advanced screener, I limited displays to "top 25". According to yahoo, there are 1200 funds in this category.





    of the 25 largest expense ratios (via MS Money) only 3 of those funds had 10 year track records.

    of the 25 largest expense ratios, only 16 had 5 year track records

    Conclusion- high cost funds may be the ones which don't "survive".

    the 25 highest expense ratios were between 2.41% and 3.83%

    10 year returns ranged from -1.94% to 3.97%
    5 year returns ranged from .6% to 9.5%

    ------------
    changed the screening criteria


    of the 25 best performing funds for last 10 years expenses ranged from .67% to 1.97%
    of the 25 best performing funds for last 5 years expenses ranged from .19% to 2.02%

    The 10 year returns ranged from 11.15% to 16.79%
    The 5 year returns ranged from 11.83% to 17.50%

    conclusion, at the very top, expense cannot predict what will be successful.

    ----------
    changed screening criteria. Look for highest cost small cap blend funds.

    expense ratios ranged from 1.88 to 18.4%
    10 yr performance ranged -28.98% to 9.88%
    5 yr performance ranged from -32% to 22%

    18 of the 25 had 5 yr performance history
    5 of the 25 had a 10 yr performance history

    two conclusions. High cost tends to impact "survivorship".
    Cost does not have as high impact on selecting funds (for small caps).


    ------------
    changed screen criteria. Looking for highest performing small cap funds.

    10 yr performance were between 13.51% and 20.85%
    10 yr expense ratios were between .79% and 2.19%

    5 yr expense ratios were between .65% and 4.19%
    5 yr performance were between 16.76% and 23.70%

    conclusion- not sure... the better funds had a lower cost (for small caps) but still could not predict performance.



    conclusion (overall)- high fees pick bad funds, but several of the top funds had "average fees". Use high fees to predict the bad funds- the really bad ones. But going with lowest cost is not the way to top performance.

    This is for discussion and friendly banter... fire away
    Last edited by jIM_Ohio; 03-02-2007, 12:23 PM.
Working...
X