Okay folks. I will put one out there for debate. I am not going to give specifics but the scenario below is comparable.
A company is having a contest with potential prize codes available inside the packaging. The company screwed up and the customer is able to see through the packaging and whether the code says Sorry or Winner. The product can be removed from the shelf and examined to see if there are any winning codes. If there are winning codes, the customer is able to purchase them and ultimately win the prize. Although this product is sold in various stores, this contest is specific to a particular chain of stores.
Of course there is no guarantee that any particular store will have the product with a winning code, but there is a clear advantage of being able to see the prize code.
So is it unethical to go through the product that is in the store ready to purchase, and cherry pick the winning codes?
A company is having a contest with potential prize codes available inside the packaging. The company screwed up and the customer is able to see through the packaging and whether the code says Sorry or Winner. The product can be removed from the shelf and examined to see if there are any winning codes. If there are winning codes, the customer is able to purchase them and ultimately win the prize. Although this product is sold in various stores, this contest is specific to a particular chain of stores.
Of course there is no guarantee that any particular store will have the product with a winning code, but there is a clear advantage of being able to see the prize code.
So is it unethical to go through the product that is in the store ready to purchase, and cherry pick the winning codes?
Comment