Hey I have a potential situation that I am researching. I am a financial wellness service provider. I do not sell any financial products, and thus I am not registered or licensed (no need to be).
There is an RIA in town who works with businesses and advises on 401ks. A client of the RIA is looking for an educational component to the financial services, and the RIA is thinking about referring the client to me.
However, if I start doing work for the client company, the RIA would like their "cut" for getting me the referral. And I am on board that they should be compensated for the referral.
My question is if there is anything wrong with this arrangement? May be something that I am missing. While they are registered, I am not. However, it is not me that is receiving the referral fee or "commission" - it is them.
Under normal circumstances where it is the RIA that is paying an outside solicitor, their are several rules and regulations. However, in my situation, it is all reversed.
Ultimately, I want to ensure that everything is on the up and up.
There is an RIA in town who works with businesses and advises on 401ks. A client of the RIA is looking for an educational component to the financial services, and the RIA is thinking about referring the client to me.
However, if I start doing work for the client company, the RIA would like their "cut" for getting me the referral. And I am on board that they should be compensated for the referral.
My question is if there is anything wrong with this arrangement? May be something that I am missing. While they are registered, I am not. However, it is not me that is receiving the referral fee or "commission" - it is them.
Under normal circumstances where it is the RIA that is paying an outside solicitor, their are several rules and regulations. However, in my situation, it is all reversed.
Ultimately, I want to ensure that everything is on the up and up.

Comment