Inspired by another discussion... What helps people get out of poverty and why can't some break this cycle?
Yes, it is hard. But growing up in NYC in an immigrant community, I could not help but notice that families of immigrants that came here with $50-$500 (a lot of my HS and college classmates), shared a room, parents got low paying jobs right away, have all mostly done well enough (I would say average salary of 60-140k), while there is a much lower rate of success in places like projects, where people have advantages like speaking English, understanding the system well, etc.
I thought about it, and noticed some correlation. It is not about the financial resources that they come with.
1) Kids moved from capital cities or large cities, with generally strong school systems (in my community it was Russia and China). They did not speak English, but it took very short time for them to learn, and they were usually 2 years ahead in math and sciences already. Kids from villages or small towns tended not to do as well, and that carried all the way into adulthood.
2). Their parents were educated. Even if they could not apply the skills here, and went into low paying jobs such as CNA or catering waiters, it made the difference in how much emphasis was put on education in the household.
3). Expectations. Immigrant kids were not allowed by their family or their community to get angry. Even if they faced discrimination or had problems finding jobs. You think you have a disadvantage over the American kid because of your accent? Well, so and so's kids are successful and got a job anyway, so you must do the same. No blaming allowed, everything is your responsibility. That may not be fair, but probably is more effective than just getting upset at society.
So a child of a Korean nail technician probably has a higher chance of succeeding than a child of native born person in poverty. Even if the technician starts out with nothing but a $20,000 debt for coming here.
I think in the ideal world, what needs to be done to address poverty is to bring schools in poor areas closer in line with schools in the rich areas. This is something that starts setting kids apart early on, more than money. Maybe that's why the immigrant kids that have a strong academic base from their own country do better. And they already have that discipline and expectations needed to succeed.
Focusing on schools, school nutrition, and societal expectations, quality childcare is probably a better approach. But the school rift is getting larger, not smaller and I think as long as we have school funding tied to the affluence of the community, that's going to be the result.
Yes, it is hard. But growing up in NYC in an immigrant community, I could not help but notice that families of immigrants that came here with $50-$500 (a lot of my HS and college classmates), shared a room, parents got low paying jobs right away, have all mostly done well enough (I would say average salary of 60-140k), while there is a much lower rate of success in places like projects, where people have advantages like speaking English, understanding the system well, etc.
I thought about it, and noticed some correlation. It is not about the financial resources that they come with.
1) Kids moved from capital cities or large cities, with generally strong school systems (in my community it was Russia and China). They did not speak English, but it took very short time for them to learn, and they were usually 2 years ahead in math and sciences already. Kids from villages or small towns tended not to do as well, and that carried all the way into adulthood.
2). Their parents were educated. Even if they could not apply the skills here, and went into low paying jobs such as CNA or catering waiters, it made the difference in how much emphasis was put on education in the household.
3). Expectations. Immigrant kids were not allowed by their family or their community to get angry. Even if they faced discrimination or had problems finding jobs. You think you have a disadvantage over the American kid because of your accent? Well, so and so's kids are successful and got a job anyway, so you must do the same. No blaming allowed, everything is your responsibility. That may not be fair, but probably is more effective than just getting upset at society.
So a child of a Korean nail technician probably has a higher chance of succeeding than a child of native born person in poverty. Even if the technician starts out with nothing but a $20,000 debt for coming here.
I think in the ideal world, what needs to be done to address poverty is to bring schools in poor areas closer in line with schools in the rich areas. This is something that starts setting kids apart early on, more than money. Maybe that's why the immigrant kids that have a strong academic base from their own country do better. And they already have that discipline and expectations needed to succeed.
Focusing on schools, school nutrition, and societal expectations, quality childcare is probably a better approach. But the school rift is getting larger, not smaller and I think as long as we have school funding tied to the affluence of the community, that's going to be the result.
Comment