My husband was hit in the back at a very high speed by a teen driver. He had to put the brakes on to keep from being propelled into the intersection. It was at a stop sign.
He did not try to get out to get witnesses. The kid gets out and openly and in a friendly manner admits it was all his fault. They exchange insurance info.
Hubby calls me. I am more concerned about him having his head rest up and if he got a whiplash.
And if he is able to drive. I assure him a rear end hit is usually no fault. The person hitting the backend of a car is automatically at fault.
Or so I thought.
This kid gets home and his father calls their insurance company immediately and then all of sudden the other insurance company's agent (of a very little known ins. co. - have never even heard of them) is grilling my husband on the phone of how "you backed into our insured's car at a stop sign and caused all this damage".
Of course my husband tells the truth about the situation. And then calls our ins. company (one of the best by the way USAA).
He has taken in the truck for a damage appraisal (and it is in the thousands even though the truck is driveable).
But the thing is we could end up paying the deductible of $500.00 (ouch!) for it to be repaired depending on if it is contested, etc.
The absurdity of it all and this truck is almost paid off in just a few months.
Lessons learned already:
Immediately call your own ins. company after making sure everyone is ok.
Always call the police to come out. The rule used to be if it was thought to be over $250.00 damage - the cost of cars/repairs now makes that very easily reached.
If someone is admitting it is their fault - have them write that statement and sign it on the paper of exchanged insurance info.
Here we are going to be possibly liable (raised insurance rates/on Husband's ins. record of being at fault/contested) and pay out a deductible.
We are still in the process right now, but am just shocked.
We do have an EF (how glad I always insist on this but it has taken a battering this past year).
From a legal standpoint it is just not worth taking to a small claims court.
Any feedback by anyone with this experience is appreciated.
Do ins. agents 'fight it out' or does the appraisal of damages usually tell what really happened, is a lesser known or unknown co. going to be intimidated to go up against a
more well known established co., etc...
I just do not know much about insurance industry but am quickly learning.
He did not try to get out to get witnesses. The kid gets out and openly and in a friendly manner admits it was all his fault. They exchange insurance info.
Hubby calls me. I am more concerned about him having his head rest up and if he got a whiplash.
And if he is able to drive. I assure him a rear end hit is usually no fault. The person hitting the backend of a car is automatically at fault.
Or so I thought.
This kid gets home and his father calls their insurance company immediately and then all of sudden the other insurance company's agent (of a very little known ins. co. - have never even heard of them) is grilling my husband on the phone of how "you backed into our insured's car at a stop sign and caused all this damage".
Of course my husband tells the truth about the situation. And then calls our ins. company (one of the best by the way USAA).
He has taken in the truck for a damage appraisal (and it is in the thousands even though the truck is driveable).
But the thing is we could end up paying the deductible of $500.00 (ouch!) for it to be repaired depending on if it is contested, etc.
The absurdity of it all and this truck is almost paid off in just a few months.
Lessons learned already:
Immediately call your own ins. company after making sure everyone is ok.
Always call the police to come out. The rule used to be if it was thought to be over $250.00 damage - the cost of cars/repairs now makes that very easily reached.
If someone is admitting it is their fault - have them write that statement and sign it on the paper of exchanged insurance info.
Here we are going to be possibly liable (raised insurance rates/on Husband's ins. record of being at fault/contested) and pay out a deductible.
We are still in the process right now, but am just shocked.
We do have an EF (how glad I always insist on this but it has taken a battering this past year).
From a legal standpoint it is just not worth taking to a small claims court.
Any feedback by anyone with this experience is appreciated.
Do ins. agents 'fight it out' or does the appraisal of damages usually tell what really happened, is a lesser known or unknown co. going to be intimidated to go up against a
more well known established co., etc...
I just do not know much about insurance industry but am quickly learning.
Comment