Originally posted by disneysteve
View Post
Steve--This long standing fundamental view held by many here. I like to expand this just a bit more and to make my point. This is my last comment on this issue.
While I may not share the view completely, this is exactly what’s wrong with “nuclear” family in general. The US in general stands for liberty and opportunity. Immigrants flock into this country for greater postures as my parents did many decades ago. We’re number one in charity giving and foreign aids to many countries. We go to war against other nation to protect our own self-interest like oils in Iraq. Yet we don’t seem provide enough relief to our own families instead we pass it on to others to pay for. Why is that? Its one thing to provide support to our own husband/wife and kids, so say we don’t care about mom and dad, brother, sister, nephew or nieces who are struggling financially themselves perhaps. It’s ironic. To say “I won’t provide them my own means of ‘thank you for raising me’ now that I’m gone…'screw you'! There is just something fundamentally cruel about this view and no matter how unintentional we are financially, limiting support only to immediate family members is missing the most important view IMO, taking care of your own family members not just your “own” helps. Those especially in needs.
Sorry about being off topic. Off to my 1:30 meeting

Comment