The Saving Advice Forums - A classic personal finance community.

Wood Pellets Are No Longer A Cheap Alternative Fuel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wood Pellets Are No Longer A Cheap Alternative Fuel

    By Sam Streubel

    As of 3/20/06 it was actually cheaper in Metro Boston to heat with natural gas than with wood pellets!

    During these times of fuel price volatility, it's important to keep a close eye on the relationship between fuel prices. Any homeowner who uses a wood pellet stove to supplement their gas furnace could be losing money and not even know it.

    <script type="text/javascript">google_ad_client = "pub-8949118578199171";google_ad_width = 728;google_ad_height = 90;google_ad_format = "728x90_as";google_ad_channel ="";google_color_border = "EAEAEA";google_color_bg = "EAEAEA";google_color_link = "4271B5";google_color_url = "99CC66";google_color_text = "000000";</script>
    <center><script type="text/javascript"src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script></center>

    If you can use a calculator, you're only minutes away from figuring out which fuel is the cheapest to burn at any given time.

    When you compare fuel heating costs make sure it's apples to apples. The standard quantity used for comparing residential fuel costs is 1,000,000 BTUs of fuel heat content.

    <b>Cost To Burn Wood Pellets</b>

    Since a wood pellet stove needs only 125 lbs (1/16 of a ton) of pellets to generate 1,000,000 BTUs, divide the cost per ton by 16. At $198 a ton for wood pellets it costs $12.38 to produce 1,000,000 BTUs.

    <b>Cost To Burn Natural Gas</b>

    The price per therm (look at your gas bill) of natural gas in Boston is $1.1813. When you multiply it by 10.30 (10.30 cubic feet) it costs $12.17 to produce 1,000,000 BTUs.

    It's easy to see that natural gas heat now costs about $0.21 less per 1,000,000 BTUs than wood pellets.

    Here are the quick cost comparison formulas for wood pellets and natural gas:

    Price per ton of wood pellets divided by 16 = Cost to produce 1,000,000 BTUs.

    Price per therm of natural gas x 10.30 = Cost to produce 1,000,000 BTUs.

    The quick cost formulas are useful only for comparing natural gas to wood pellets because their fuel efficiencies are similar. In order to calculate the effective, or true cost of any heating fuel for comparison purposes, you must factor in the fuel's efficiency.

    All fuel efficiencies are expressed in percentages. For example: coal is 60% efficient, electricity is 100% efficient and fuel oil is 80% efficient. In order to make the fuel efficiency percentage useful when you compare one fuel to another, you must find the coefficient of these percentages by dividing the decimal equivalent (60% = .60) by 1. So if you divide .60 by 1 you get a coefficient of 1.67.

    The fuel efficiency rating for natural gas and wood pellets is 85%. If you divide 1 by .85 you get a coefficient of 1.18. Now plug this into our quick cost formula to obtain the effective, or true cost, of the fuel you are burning.

    Wood Pellets: $198 divided by 16 x 1.18 = $14.60

    Natural Gas: $1.1813 x 10.30 x 1.18 = $14.36

    By expanding the quick cost formula to include the efficiency coefficient, the spread between the two fuels has now widened to $0.24.

    Assuming fuel prices don't go crazy, you could save as much as $75 during the remainder of this heating season by switching from wood pellets back to natural gas.

    As prices change, feel confident that you have armed yourself with a simple, yet powerful tool to help you quickly determine when one fuel is more cost effective to burn than the other.

    Here are the formulas to help you determine the true cost to produce 1mil BTUs of heat content for six more fuels:

    Electricity: Price per kilowatt hour x 293 x 1 = Corn Pellets: Price per ton divided by 16 x 1.18 = Fuel Oil: Price per gallon x 7.1 x 1.25 = LP Gas: Price per gallon x 11 x 1.25 = Wood: Price per cord x .0607 x 1.67 = Kerosene: Price per gallon x 7.41 x 1.25 =

    *****************************
    Copyright 2006 by Sam Streubel. he writes for <a href="http://www.Alternative-Heating-Info.com">Alternate Heating Info</a> - your guide to wood and wood pellet stoves, corn stoves, solar heating systems, radiant heating, portable space heaters, geothermal heat pumps, and landscaping for shade and windbreaks.

  • #2
    Re: Wood Pellets Are No Longer A Cheap Alternative Fuel

    Jeffrey,
    Does the 85% efficiency take into account boiler age/radiator type etc? We are moving from a condo in VT, which we heat with a pellet stove (the other option is electric baseboard heat, pellet stove wins big time there) to a Victorian in Concord NH. The new (to us) house has natural gas, steam heat, and a boiler that is about 20 yrs old adn steam radiators. It has a ventless gas "woodstove" in the fireplace on the first floor used for supplemention/decoration, not really sure what.

    Doing the math seems pretty clear to me that replacing the boiler with an energy efficiency one is the first order of heating business. But given that we have steam heat, doesn't a lot of gas' efficiency get lost in the process? The Europa fancy stove that heats up to $2500 square feet and is nice enough to go into a formal living room looks a little tempting to me as an adjunct heat source, turning off many of the radiators in the house. This month's gas cost per therm is 1.32, it was up to $1.60 a therm this past winter, we pay $175 a ton for pellets including delivery, although I'd have to see if rates are similar in Concord.

    I dream about geothermal heat, but I think that is for another life in another house...

    thanks, Erin

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Wood Pellets Are No Longer A Cheap Alternative Fuel

      Erin,

      Fastest payback for energy dollar is building envelope improvements. Appropriate insulation, sealing drafts, proper air exchange / ventilation, fixing windows and doors, etc.

      Next would be upgrading the heating plant. I will go out on a limb and state that your furnace is probably 2X or 3X larger than it should be. Get a QUALIFIED heating contractor to perform a heatloss calculation for your structure to determine what size heating plant you need. Then determine IF the existing boiler needs to be replaced. Please find a contractor that is familiar with steam systems.

      I recomend HeatingHelp.com as a good place to find information about home heating systems, heatloss calculations and finding reputable heating and cooling contractors.

      Disclaimer: I am not a heating contractor nor work for any. I do have an interest in old houses and energy efficiency.

      Good luck in your new to you house and enjoy it.

      LarryC

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Wood Pellets Are No Longer A Cheap Alternative Fuel

        Thanks for the reply! We realized yesterday that there is no insulation at all in the house, walls or roof, so we will insulate the roof this year, then think about a new boiler for next year. We have all new windows. There is still some knob and tube in use in our walls, so insulating the walls will have to wait until we are ready to have everything rewired...

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Wood Pellets Are No Longer A Cheap Alternative Fuel

          Is the roof slate or asphalt shigles? Slate require ventilation under the wood to ensure the moisture can escape.

          LarryC

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Wood Pellets Are No Longer A Cheap Alternative Fuel

            The roof is asphalt shingles, I guess I technically what I am saying is that we will insulate the attic this summer. It just amazes me that the people we bought from replaced all the windows, but did nothing about insulation. I am hoping, maybe a little optimistically, that by insulating the attic this year, and replacing our 30+ year old boiler with an energy star one next year, we can cut our gas bills by 50%, yet still be warm.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Wood Pellets Are No Longer A Cheap Alternative Fuel

              I live in South Dakota and I am lucky enough to live very close to a sawmill that produces pellets. I have already purchased two pallets @ $177.00 each. (4800lbs total)

              With the current price of natural gas below $5.00 is it still cheaper to burn pellets?

              Comment


              • #8
                True Cost

                The decreased prices in natural gas are a result of fracking. Fracking contaminates our groundwater and surface water. The costs associated with this destruction are incalculable. We will all pay these costs directly in higher property taxes to pay for increased waste water and drinking water treatment (or medical expenses if water treatment is not done). It is very short-sighted to think that gas is cheaper than pellets. It is far more expensive for all of us.

                Comment


                • #9
                  It's not just BTU's

                  It's nice to think that Nat. gas is now just as cheap as wood pellets if not cheaper. It seems that no one took into account the electricity it takes to move the heat from Natural gas throughout your house. I did the math as well as the originator of this posed question and found that although he is basically correct on the cost per 1,000,000 btu, a pellet stove does not require the amount of electricity that a Home heating system on Natural gas requires. I save at minimum $75 a month when I heat with pellets alone as compared to firing up the glow plugs and blower. I do have forced hot air in a fairly efficient system. I find that saving $75 -$100 a month on my electricity bill wins out!:
                  Last edited by 59chuckie; 02-16-2013, 03:21 AM. Reason: misuse of statement

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X