"Brass shines as fair to the ignorant as gold to the goldsmiths." - Elizabeth I
logo

Go Back   Saving Advice > Financial Chit Chat > Personal Finance

Personal Finance Credit cards, home loans, retirement plans and taxes. The place for all your personal finance questions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2011, 12:04 PM
disneysteve's Avatar
disneysteve disneysteve is offline
$ Saving Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 16,311
Last Blog Entry: March 2012 Survey Income
Points: 99411.30
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tripods68 View Post
BTW who want stress anyway right. I like Option A. Less stress and you'll live longer.
That is really a matter of perspective. I would find 5-10 years of work MUCH less stressful than 30 years of work. Knowing that I'd be set for retirement if I chose to do so after 5-10 years would be incredible. That doesn't necessarily mean you would have to retire at that point but you'd be free to work because you want to, not because you had to.
__________________
Steve

* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2011, 01:11 PM
tripods68 tripods68 is offline
$ Saving College Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,245
Last Blog Entry: Wife just got promoted
Points: 6770.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by disneysteve View Post
That is really a matter of perspective. I would find 5-10 years of work MUCH less stressful than 30 years of work. Knowing that I'd be set for retirement if I chose to do so after 5-10 years would be incredible. That doesn't necessarily mean you would have to retire at that point but you'd be free to work because you want to, not because you had to.
I'd say 95% of Americans (Those making less than $250K) have to work. Not because they want to, its because they have too.

The discussion of retiring early in their 40s is myth--often viewed as feel-good story than reality itself. There are very TINY group in our society that can achieve this with few exceptions, or already multi-millionaire set for life when people factor in health care cost, inflations, lifestyle (living above means), family emergency, catostrophic event, etc., no one can afford to retire at age 44. They eventually end up going back to work through boredness of health reason, financial, etc..Its statistically impossible not to.

Obviously if someone is able save or have the ability to save $150-200K a year from his or her job, they probably in the top 1% Earners and those are the people who can.
__________________
Carpe Diem
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2011, 02:19 PM
SteveBlissLaw SteveBlissLaw is offline
$ Saving Sixth Grader
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 50
Points: 280.00
Donate
Default

All depends on your personality. Me, I'd bang out another couple tough years and then go on a free ride after that.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2012 SavingAdvice.com. All Rights Reserved.