|
||||||
| Personal Finance Credit cards, home loans, retirement plans and taxes. The place for all your personal finance questions. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|||
|
For one year, the federal government is reducing the amount of social security tax it collects from your paycheck from 6.2% to 4.2%. That means an increase in your paycheck.
I say make it count. What are you going to do with your increase? Tax Bill is Law |
|
||||
|
Does anybody know if they've reduced self-employement taxes too? Self employment taxes are super high because you have to cover your share of social security AND the amount that your employer would be paying if you had one.
Doesn't seem fair to reduce employees' social security taxes for one year and not reduce the self employment tax also. I think the right answer to the OP's question is to contribute extra to our personal retirement accounts this year since we (at least employees) are paying smaller social security taxes. I'm struggling to not *reduce* my retirement contributions. Still need to get a better handle on the household budget after moving into a bigger house and going through some big medical expenses last year. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Marcus Tullius Cicero: The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance. |
|
|||
|
SS payments for self-employed should go down for part of them. The law specifically states that it is the employee's half of the contribution that will be reduced, while the employer's half of the contribution will remain the same. So although obviously I don't know for certain, my guesstimate would be that instead of paying 12.4% (the standard employer and employee contributions), you'll only have to pay 10.4% (the standard employer and reduced employee contributions). Don't take it as gospel, but that's my guess.
As for doing something with it...I'll only be getting about $75/mo extra. My pay varies more than that every month as it is, so it likely won't be a significantly noticeable change for me. As I'm already saving alot every month, I may start trying to force myself to do a little 'fun money' spending, as I currently do very little of that. Downside: I'm currently living in Japan, so the only economy to which I would be making my "patriotic boost" (unless I do my shopping online) is the Japanese economy.
__________________
"Praestantia per minutus" ... "Acta non verba" Last edited by kork13 : 12-18-2010 at 02:38 PM. |
|
|||
|
You can go to irs.gov and type in notice 1036 and it gives you the information. The employer even self-employed will still pay the 6.4
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
This SS tax-cut just replaces the "Make Work Pay" tax credit of the past couple of years, so it's not really a big deal.
Most will come out ahead but some lower-income people will actually pay more next year.
__________________
Under Capitalism man exploits man; under Communism it's vice versa. -John Kenneth Galbreath |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
www.Krantcents.com "Making sense of money" |
|
|||
|
I will increase my TSP by this amount, seeing as how this bill pretty much ensures that I will see zilch come time for me to collect social security, even though i am financing everyones social security right now.
By the way, even though FDR had the people at heart when he passed the Social Security Act in the New Deal in the early thirties, I personally do not believe in it. Essentially we loan the government our money to get it back when we are 65, if we even live to that age. I say give me my 6.5 percent of my pay and let me invest it on my own. At least it's still my money. This was a horrible move IMO, as well as letting the wealthy skate yet again. |
|
|||
|
It's about time the republicans, some democrats and the president compromise to get something done. I'm actually proud of Obama for the second time ever that he worked bipartisan to get something done.
|
|
||||
|
Can you imagine? We currently save 25% of our gross pay. If we could save 37.4% instead without changing any of our current spending, we'd be so much better off when retirement rolled around. That would be fantastic.
__________________
Steve * Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular. * Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything? * There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going. Last edited by disneysteve : 12-20-2010 at 09:05 AM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
I forgot about the pirate shooting. That was a good commander in chief decision. Although, 95% of what Obama does I don't agree with, but every once in a while he does something amazing.
|
|
||||
|
Neither DH nor I pay SS so there is no benefit here (government jobs). Of course that also means no SS once we retire.
|
|
|||
|
My wife and I have both paid SS (currently she is the only one working) so I really appreciate the benefit, especially since all she got in the past was $0 from "making work not pay" because of income cutoff limits. Oh, and there will probably be no SS for us when we retire also because we plan to save separately and SS will end up being means tested somehow.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|