"Another way to solve the traffic problems of this country is to pass a law that only paid-for cars be allowed to use the highways. " - Will Rogers
logo

Go Back   Saving Advice > Financial Chit Chat > Personal Finance

Personal Finance Credit cards, home loans, retirement plans and taxes. The place for all your personal finance questions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 10:55 AM
Scanner Scanner is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,679
Points: 15988.60
Donate
Default Theoretical Unemployment question

I work 2 jobs/careers. One is a business and the other is "per diem" work at a hospital where I am an hourly employee. I noticed on my check I pay SUI which is withheld on every check.

Let's just say for argument's sake, I make 50K/year in the business and 50K/year at the hospital in 2008 but my given hours drop off the following year where I only make 10K/year.

Am I entitled to underemployment money? Or would I have to be "laid off" in an official capacity to be eligible (disenrolled totally, rather than be given 0 hours)?

If I am not ever entitled, why am I even paying tax as a wage worker? To soley fund the possibility of a full time worker losing their job?

(thanks for answering. . .I am not interested in collecting, rather working, but I am just wondering why I am being taxed. . .unless it's not like SSI where it's a universal pay in and pay out)

I totally understand why I pay as a business owner - "That's just the way it is. . .you are a business owner, you are taxed." I don't resent it as it's just a cost of doing business. I am just trying to discern the reasoning from a casual worker point of view. Why tax casual employees?

I am thankful I don't really have to worry about this.
__________________
www.fasting-for-health.com
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 11:28 AM
MonkeyMama's Avatar
MonkeyMama MonkeyMama is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,169
Last Blog Entry: Couch Sold!
Points: 16167.40
Donate
Default

You wouldn't receive any benefits if you earn more than the max benefits. Though "officially" you would be eligible for UI, they reduce your benefits by any earned income.

Aren't you in California? SUI is paid by the employer. The only thing withheld besides FICA and withholding, should be SDI. (Disability).

In general, UI is funded by the employer. (I would assume the same for all states).
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 11:29 AM
disneysteve's Avatar
disneysteve disneysteve is online now
$ Saving Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 16,314
Last Blog Entry: March 2012 Survey Income
Points: 99426.30
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyMama View Post
Aren't you in California?
Scanner is here in NJ.
__________________
Steve

* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 12:19 PM
MonkeyMama's Avatar
MonkeyMama MonkeyMama is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,169
Last Blog Entry: Couch Sold!
Points: 16167.40
Donate
Default

I'm confusing him with someone else then.

Interesting, I googled New Jersey UI and you are correct. & I agree that it is unfair. Federally, employers pay a flat UI rate. In our state, they pay in based on employee turnover, etc. (If you never lay anyone off, you pay in very little. If you have a lot of UI Claims, you pay in more).

Sometimes, in situations like yours, you can opt out of these kinds of things. I am not familiar with New Jersey payroll though, personally. So I have no advice. I just wonder if you can opt out of UI if you are an employer, etc. Probably not, but in some instances you can.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 07:15 PM
wincrasher wincrasher is offline
$ Saving College Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,287
Points: 6965.00
Donate
Default

If you are self employed and have no employees, you shouldn't be paying UI.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2009, 08:37 PM
Goldy1 Goldy1 is offline
$ Saving College Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 668
Points: 4077.00
Donate
Default

In Michigan where I am, you must be a full time worker(there are some rare exceptions which I od not know what they are) but the norm is p/t workers even if laid off can not get unemployment, not even prorated at a lesser rate.

I used to work 32 hours per week so if I had been laid off, no unemployment would have come my way.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2012 SavingAdvice.com. All Rights Reserved.