"He does not possess wealth; it possesses him." - Benjamin Franklin
logo

Go Back   Saving Advice > Financial Chit Chat > Personal Finance

Personal Finance Credit cards, home loans, retirement plans and taxes. The place for all your personal finance questions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2009, 03:37 PM
BigVic BigVic is offline
$ Saving Fourth Grader
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 33
Points: 290.00
Donate
Default Critique my 401k investment choices.

Hey all. I would like to hear what you all think about my current investment choices and what changes could be made if any are needed.

I'm 24 and invest up to the company match. YTD I am at almost 22%.

My current investments are:

Stock Investments LARGE CAP FID GROWTH COMPANY 10%
Stock Investments LARGE CAP SPARTAN US EQ INDEX 60%
Stock Investments MID-CAP FIDELITY LOW PR STK 10%
Stock Investments INTERNATIONAL AMER CAP WRLD G&I R4 20%



The funds available to me are:

(FID FREEDOM FUNDS)
Blended Fund Investments -- FID FREEDOM INCOME
Bond Investments Stable Value FID MGD INC PORT
Bond Investments Income FIDELITY GOVT INCOME
Bond Investments Income PIM TOTAL RT INST
Stock Investments Large Cap ABF LG CAP VAL INV
Stock Investments Large Cap DAVIS NY VENTURE A
Stock Investments Large Cap FID GROWTH COMPANY 10%
Stock Investments Large Cap SPARTAN US EQ INDEX 60%
Stock Investments Mid-Cap FIDELITY LOW PR STK 10%

Stock Investments Mid-Cap MSIF MID CAP GRTH P
Stock Investments Small Cap ABF SM CAP VAL INV
Stock Investments Small Cap ROYCE VALUE PLUS SER
Stock Investments International AMER CAP WRLD G&I R4 20%
Stock Investments International FID DIVERSIFIED INTL



Thanks for any insight you can provide.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2009, 11:35 PM
creditcardchaser creditcardchaser is offline
$ Saving Second Grader
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Points: 75.00
Donate
Default

Personally, I would want to see a little more small cap exposure and maybe even some more international exposure that what you have but overall it doesn't look too bad.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 08:11 AM
Broken Arrow Broken Arrow is offline
Foot in mouth diseased
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,657
Last Blog Entry: CR-48
Points: 25090.40
Donate
Default

At the risk of sounding lazy, it's kind of hard to say without tickers....

How do you feel about the low-priced fund and the growth fund? Any particular reason why you chose those?

Also, how do you feel about 100% stocks?

This could be appropriate if you have a high risk tolerance and have a taste for adventure (hence the reason why I ask about the low-priced fund and the growth fund). If not, then I would probably change those two funds based on your risk tolerance and personal preferences.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 12:51 PM
BigVic BigVic is offline
$ Saving Fourth Grader
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 33
Points: 290.00
Donate
Default

So do you think the Freedom 2050 fund is a better route?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 01:00 PM
Broken Arrow Broken Arrow is offline
Foot in mouth diseased
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,657
Last Blog Entry: CR-48
Points: 25090.40
Donate
Default

Unless you have specific preferences and if the aggressiveness the Freedom funds are unsuitable for you somehow, then yes, I do think the Freedom funds are the better way to go.

In fact, my current 401(k) is 100% into Freedom Fund 2040.

Target retirement type funds aren't always perfect, as cookie-cutter solutions will never be the ideal solution for every situation. But... before someone decides to move beyond them, I strongly recommend to understand how these funds work, and then be able to clearly articulate why they don't fit your needs. More often than not, I think people will find that it manual slice and dice will only complicate things with very little gain in the process.

That's why I haven't moved beyond them either, because I don't see how I can do it that much better right now, rather than just sitting on this one fund.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 01:07 PM
BigVic BigVic is offline
$ Saving Fourth Grader
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 33
Points: 290.00
Donate
Default

My target date would be around 2050 but I see that the 2040 has a 4 star morningstar rating and has been around a little longer than the 2050 which has a 3 star rating. The 2040's expense ratio is lower too. Do you think the 2040 might be the best option for me even though my target date is 2050?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2009, 02:05 PM
Broken Arrow Broken Arrow is offline
Foot in mouth diseased
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,657
Last Blog Entry: CR-48
Points: 25090.40
Donate
Default

I recommend to stick with the target horizon of your retirement. That's how these fund (of funds) are designed and that's how we should use them most of the time.

As such, because I am 35 years old, that's why I'm in 2040, not 2050. So, for you, 2050 is appropriate.

Oh, and one more thing. I would take Morningstar ratings with a grain of salt. They are arbitrary measures of performance relative to similar fund types in the industry. It has its uses, but it doesn't always mean that a high star fund is somehow superior to a low star fund, nor does it tell us at all whether it's appropriate for us in our asset allocation. This is probably more useful when looking at actively managed specialty and concentrated funds....

Last edited by Broken Arrow : 09-23-2009 at 02:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2009, 02:18 PM
kanjoh kanjoh is offline
$ Saving Fourth Grader
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 20
Points: 120.00
Donate
Default

The most important thing to think about is the fees (are there loads, what is the annual fee?). 75% of mutual funds underperform their benchmark index, and its really hard to figure out which 25% outperform in a given year. Therefore, I recommend going with index funds so as to mirror the market while minimizing your fees.

Lifecycle funds are also great. Vanguard has a great, inexpensive set of offerings here.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2009, 02:00 PM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 5,376
Last Blog Entry: Career change
Points: 27853.63
Donate
Default

Royce funds are usually small cap oriented and I was impressed with them when I had one fund in my Vanguard 401k with them a few years back.

Without knowing your risk tolerance, the fund choices are meaningless.
__________________
  • General questions get general responses. Specific questions get better responses. Want a better answer? Re-read my signature LOL
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 04:49 PM
Brad VanGuard Brad VanGuard is offline
$ Saving Third Grader
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 19
Points: 125.00
Donate
Default 401K Withdrawal Rules

Looks like you're doing great, if I may, I would like to suggest a site that deals with 401K information:

401K Withdrawal Rules

Let me know if it helps!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2009, 11:30 PM
snafu snafu is offline
$ Saving College Junior
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: W. Canada
Posts: 1,452
Points: 7785.00
Donate
Default

Given your age and the length of time you have until you need to be more risk adverse...I suggest you start looking at some International Stocks...particularly those in S. American. You could widen your horizon by investing in a non retirement fund without support from your employer!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2012 SavingAdvice.com. All Rights Reserved.