"How to have your cake and eat it: Lend it out at interest." - Unknown
logo

Go Back   Saving Advice > Financial Chit Chat > Personal Finance

Personal Finance Credit cards, home loans, retirement plans and taxes. The place for all your personal finance questions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2008, 02:50 PM
maat55's Avatar
maat55 maat55 is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,481
Points: 18557.00
Donate
Default Estate Tax

For a person dying during 2006, 2007, or 2008, the "applicable exclusion amount" is $2,000,000, so if the sum of the taxable estate plus the "adjusted taxable gifts" made during lifetime equals $2,000,000 or less, there is no federal estate tax to pay. According to the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the applicable exclusion will increase to $3,500,000 in 2009, the estate tax is repealed in 2010, but then the act "sunsets" in 2011 and the estate tax reappears with an applicable exclusion amount of only $1,000,000 (unless Congress acts before then).


What is up with this? Hey Oprah, you should die in 2010 and pay no estate tax, but in 2011 you will pay 55% on anything over 1 million.

Is the government crazy or just me?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2008, 03:14 PM
sweeps sweeps is offline
Hopeless Optimist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,170
Points: 27012.30
Donate
Default

Politicians aren't stupid. Sunset provisions are a sweet deal. It basically allows them to take credit for eliminating the "death tax" while minimizing the projected cost to the government's budget. Let someone else have to deal with the fallout when the provision expires.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2008, 07:06 PM
maat55's Avatar
maat55 maat55 is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,481
Points: 18557.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweeps View Post
Politicians aren't stupid. Sunset provisions are a sweet deal. It basically allows them to take credit for eliminating the "death tax" while minimizing the projected cost to the government's budget. Let someone else have to deal with the fallout when the provision expires.
It will be interesting to see what Obama's plan for it is. Maybe this is why Oprah is backing him. She will want him to extend the full exemption.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2008, 07:39 PM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 5,388
Last Blog Entry: Career change
Points: 27923.63
Donate
Default

Obama would not be likely to extend this lack of tax- democrats typically vote against the estate tax if memory serves me correctly.

Something like 95% of estates are settled for less than $2M, so that is where that number came from.
__________________
  • General questions get general responses. Specific questions get better responses. Want a better answer? Re-read my signature LOL
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2012 SavingAdvice.com. All Rights Reserved.