Home  Finance Articles  Discussion  Our Blog / Member Blogs           
SavingAdvice.com Logo Inexpensive Lawyer
How to reduce costs when you need a lawyer
Teaching you to Save Money

Go Back   Personal Finance Forums > Financial Chit Chat > Personal Finance

Personal Finance Credit cards, home loans, retirement plans and taxes. The place for all your personal finance questions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 11:21 AM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Assistant Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 3,858
Last Blog Entry: Using a retirement calculator
Points: 19948.63
Donate
Default

Jinco- what I see is a need for tax planning before you make the decision to pay down the debt.

You are in a situation where if someone can save you 5% of the 210k you earn each year, we are talking about $11k. 10% would be 21k.

That is the difference between 33 and 28% tax bracket, or the difference between 35 and 25% tax brackets.

Consider tax planning to
a) avoid the amt
b) set aside money before taxes (into 401k, HSA and other accounts)
c) manage the debt as part of a larger scale financial plan
__________________
*Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
*One person's stupidity is another person's job security.
[URL]http://jim.savingadvice.com/[/URL]
[URL]http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Calvin_Coolidge/[/URL]
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 12:01 PM
JinCO JinCO is offline
$ Saving HS Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 127
Points: 715.00
Donate
Default

We did not have to pay AMT last year but I think we may be getting close to the threshold. I am forecasting / budgeting our take home to be around $150K after taxes for this year. I don't know what other levers we have to lower taxes besided maxing out 401Ks. We have discussed meeting with a tax advisor...seems like it would be a good idea. I am especially worried about what could happen in a few years based on what I've read about Mr. Obama's tax policies.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 12:18 PM
JinCO JinCO is offline
$ Saving HS Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 127
Points: 715.00
Donate
Default

It seems like a lot of the posts are saying that we have been financially irresponsible by accumulating so much debt. When making the decisions to go to graduate schools and finance via student loans we fully undertood the financial implications of both paying off the debt and increasing our lifetime earning potential. I get the sense that most people in this forum are very debt adverse and wouldn't take out huge student loans to finance education. When deciding to take on this debt we viewed this as an investment in ourselves. We were making decent money before graduate schools but now have a much higher top end earning potential.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 12:40 PM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Assistant Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 3,858
Last Blog Entry: Using a retirement calculator
Points: 19948.63
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JinCO View Post
It seems like a lot of the posts are saying that we have been financially irresponsible by accumulating so much debt. When making the decisions to go to graduate schools and finance via student loans we fully undertood the financial implications of both paying off the debt and increasing our lifetime earning potential. I get the sense that most people in this forum are very debt adverse and wouldn't take out huge student loans to finance education. When deciding to take on this debt we viewed this as an investment in ourselves. We were making decent money before graduate schools but now have a much higher top end earning potential.
Jinco- you hit the nail on the head so hard you only needed to swing the hammer once.

Most people on this board are debt averse. In addition there are people here which can squeeze every last penny out of a budget if you need that assistance.

Hopefully you saw that I did not criticise the debt load. More than likely what you need is a plan, and what I see is the desire for a plan, and a lack of knowledge of what the various issues you need/want/would consider.

For example- what are your goals? You did not state anything to really form a plan on. And to this forum's credit, many people assumed you need/want a debt free goal (and want that goal achieved soon).

In defense of the board, your first paragraph read
Quote:
My wife and I have a considerable debt load in the form of our home mortgages and student loans. Our focus in the past couple of years has been to reduce the interest rates where possible through consolidation or new loans and attempt to pay off as much debt as we can as quickly as we can afford to.
I saw the last paragraph and considered this the goal
Quote:
I am trying to figure out at what point it makes sense to switch some of the money we are paying on our debt to investments. We are currently paying about $20K more than we need to on our debt items. Should we reduce some of the amounts we are paying on our debt items and purchase stocks or other investments?
Most people's advice was not to shift from debt reduction to accumulation.

I will again state that my advice would be to accumulate as much as possible (as much as you are comfortable with relative to the debt load). 15k into the 401ks is not enough (IMO). 15k is 7% of 210k. You need to double that savings rate.

You need to do a timeline of the following:
1) when will each debt currently be paid off (with no extra payments)
2) when will each debt be paid off (with current 20k of extra payments).
3) if you invested the 20k (or a portion of it), how much risk would you take with it, and what return would you expect?
4) as debts got paid off, what would you do with the money allocated to the debt?

1) and 3) are really the same plan- this considers more money is invested now, net worth will be proportional to investment performance from the start (more or less) because the debt will be around for a long period of time and decrease slowly. When debt is paid off net worth and retirement accounts will be quite high.
2) and 4) complement each other. This considers the money from debt 1 being paid off is either then invested or applied to debt 2. When debt 2 is paid off, you will apply the money to investments or debt 3. Net worth will go up real slow (relative to case above), but debt load decreases real fast. Generally speaking, you can only catch up to first scenario if you increase savings rate.

plot a timeline with the following numbers crunched:
a) debt load each year
b) net worth each year (this would reflect less debt year over year, and increased home equity year over year, in addition to retirement accounts)
c) retirement account value each year (only include money invested for retirement or long term spending).

You need to run 1) and 3) with outputs of a-b-c
You need to run 2) and 4) with outputs of a-b-c

You need to run 1) and 3) and see a savings rate of 16% compound over time. When you run 2) and 4), you need to realize your savings rate is about 7%, and to retire you will probably increase savings rate to about 25% to reach same goal/net worth/ retirement account size as the 1) 3) scenario.

Note the reason for a timeline is so you can see what it costs you. If student loans have a 5 year repayment period, it might make more sense to pay them off sooner, then invest that whole student loan payment and the extra 20k (debt paydown) once the student loans are paid off. If the student loans have a 30 year repayment period, not paying them off sooner will probably work out better.

Each situation is different. The primary issue is the 20k you apply to debt and the proportion the 20k is to the size of the debt and the monthly payment you save when debt is paid off.

Either scenario is OK (2-4 has less risk than 1-3); 1-3 has higher probable return than 2-4, higher net worth and more risk.

If you are comfortable managing the risk, then you can make a good decision (which is what I assume you posted here to determine).

This is just the start.

Then you need to look at current tax return and see if you can do the same plan above (1-3 or 2-4; whichever you choose), but get more money working for you (based on tax savings, such as an HSA, or using tax efficient investments). Creating a small business would also help.

You would also need to factor in mid term problems. New car needed? Emergency fund? Health care spending now and in future. Child's education? Continuing education for you and spouse.

These would impact taxes, so if you have a goal, state it.

My advice will center around a broad financial plan which
a) sends at least 15% of gross income to retirement
b) keep spending moderate (spend less than you earn)- spending is calculated on net pay with 15% of gross already deducted. 15% of 210k is 31.5k per year (this is the amount I would suggest you invest for retirement each year).
c) keep debt to a minimum
d) build a broad financial plan to diversify risk, stay involved in community (give back) and do what makes you feel good.
__________________
*Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
*One person's stupidity is another person's job security.
[URL]http://jim.savingadvice.com/[/URL]
[URL]http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Calvin_Coolidge/[/URL]

Last edited by jIM_Ohio : 06-23-2008 at 12:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 12:46 PM
noppenbd noppenbd is offline
$ Saving College Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 888
Last Blog Entry: Refi Done Deal
Points: 2170.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jIM_Ohio View Post
I will again state that my advice would be to accumulate as much as possible (as much as you are comfortable with relative to the debt load). 15k into the 401ks is not enough (IMO). 15k is 7% of 210k. You need to double that savings rate.
.
Jim, OP first post says that both him and wife max 401ks; I take that to read that they put in 15.5K each, meaning 31K per year. So they are already saving 15%.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 12:55 PM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Assistant Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 3,858
Last Blog Entry: Using a retirement calculator
Points: 19948.63
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noppenbd View Post
Jim, OP first post says that both him and wife max 401ks; I take that to read that they put in 15.5K each, meaning 31K per year. So they are already saving 15%.
Good point, I went back and read

Quote:
We both max our 401Ks at $15.5K per year. I receive a 7% employer match and my wife receives a 4% match.
It appears OP meets the 15% savings guideline recomended by many investment professionals (T Rowe Price is where I get my savings suggestions from).

Other advice above is still quite accurate (need to formulate goals and risk tolerance).
__________________
*Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
*One person's stupidity is another person's job security.
[URL]http://jim.savingadvice.com/[/URL]
[URL]http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Calvin_Coolidge/[/URL]
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 01:00 PM
LivingAlmostLarge LivingAlmostLarge is offline
$ Saving College Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,457
Points: 16791.50
Donate
Default

I have no issues with your debt either house or student loans. I have a mortgage similar to yours and student debt, but not as much.

I already mentioned the ROI of your student loans seems quite hefty considering you are making $210/year at 31. That's nothing to sniff at and will likely go higher.

I think the problem is people think only get rid of debt. Good, but you are in an income where you need to consider lowering taxable income because it saves you more like myself and Jim have pointed out.

Another thing is what's done is done. More than buying an expensive house (which I also have), is not having kids. BUT realistically who does that?

You and I both know your mortgage savings is minimal when compared to your daycare costs. But heck you are doing fine as long as you keep on track to not start spending more.

So my vote is buffer ef, then look at debt repayment.
__________________
LivingAlmostLarge Blog
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 01:10 PM
JinCO JinCO is offline
$ Saving HS Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 127
Points: 715.00
Donate
Default

jIM_Ohio - thanks for your post. I like the idea of the forecasting analysis that you have proposed. I put together a net worth model last week based on our current assets/debt/spending/savings plan. I think it would make a lot of sense to put together a few different "what if" scenarios by modifying the amount of money that went towards paying debt vs. investing. The one thing I always strugle with is what number to use a projected growth rate. I am currently forecasting a growth rate of 6% in my 401Ks, but I have read that people use 8% - 10% or higher in a lot of cases.

I also agree that we need to factor in some of our mid-term financial goals. We receive bonuses in Aug and Sept. so my plan is to use this to build up or emergency fund. We also need to factor in car expenses and savings for my daughter's education.

You are correct in assuming that my ultimate goal is not to pay off all of the debt as soon as possible if this will result in less net worth long term. I should have been more specific in my post.

One correction to your post - we are actually each putting in $15.5 annually towards 401K so $31K total. I would like to increase this number over time, but will probably keep this as our primary retirement savings vehicle over the next 3 years as we try to reduce our debt load.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 01:25 PM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Assistant Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 3,858
Last Blog Entry: Using a retirement calculator
Points: 19948.63
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JinCO View Post
jIM_Ohio - thanks for your post. I like the idea of the forecasting analysis that you have proposed. I put together a net worth model last week based on our current assets/debt/spending/savings plan. I think it would make a lot of sense to put together a few different "what if" scenarios by modifying the amount of money that went towards paying debt vs. investing. The one thing I always strugle with is what number to use a projected growth rate. I am currently forecasting a growth rate of 6% in my 401Ks, but I have read that people use 8% - 10% or higher in a lot of cases.

I also agree that we need to factor in some of our mid-term financial goals. We receive bonuses in Aug and Sept. so my plan is to use this to build up or emergency fund. We also need to factor in car expenses and savings for my daughter's education.

You are correct in assuming that my ultimate goal is not to pay off all of the debt as soon as possible if this will result in less net worth long term. I should have been more specific in my post.

One correction to your post - we are actually each putting in $15.5 annually towards 401K so $31K total. I would like to increase this number over time, but will probably keep this as our primary retirement savings vehicle over the next 3 years as we try to reduce our debt load.
A good, specific post.

General questions get general answers (3 pages of them so far)
Specific questions should get more specific answers.

8% return for planning in 401k should be minimum. If you are planning (investing) in such a way to get 6% return, I would pay down the debt before accepting a 6% return.

In a taxable account, 7% return should be acceptable (lose 1% to taxes).

Plan for 8% long term and track this- so you know if you are getting the same return as your investments. If mutual fund reported an 11% yearly return and you only calculated 8%, there is an inefficiency you need to track and possibly fix.

In general, investing will beat paying off debt like yours every time. Investing for a 7-8% return while borrowing money at 3-4-5% rates is a net gain of 2% (7%-5%=2%).

This is leverage working for you.

Your risks with leverage would include losing a job, so make sure you hedge this risk with an emergency fund of around 12 months worth of expenses.
__________________
*Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
*One person's stupidity is another person's job security.
[URL]http://jim.savingadvice.com/[/URL]
[URL]http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Calvin_Coolidge/[/URL]
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 01:25 PM
JinCO JinCO is offline
$ Saving HS Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 127
Points: 715.00
Donate
Default

LivingAlmostLarge- yes, waiting for children would have helped our current situation but I'm not sure that it would have helped our long term situation. If we waited we could have paid off more debt and been in a better financial situation at this point. On the other hand, my wife plans to continue working and her job will likely become more demanding as time goes on which would make it harder to balance working with time off for pregnancy, maternity leave, etc.

My question for you is why debt repayment vs. investing in something that would yield a higher return. $52K of our student loans are scheduled to drop to a rate of 2.65% next year. It seems to me that at some point it becomes a numbers game. Why should I spend $20K / year towards debt that is growing at a rate lower than inflation instead of investing in something I could be earning 6% - 8% on? I am planning on putting together some 'what if' analysis based on the suggestion of jIM_OHIO to understand my options better.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 01:42 PM
JinCO JinCO is offline
$ Saving HS Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 127
Points: 715.00
Donate
Default

jIM_OHIO - the 6% number was just used in my model, not based on actuals. I was trying to be conservative when forecasting but I will move it to 8% for now and track the results.

12 months seems like a pretty hefty emergency fund. We do have some levers to work with if one of us lost our jobs. $2600 in child care costs would go away right of the bat. We could also reduce / eliminate $401K investing. We could also reduce "overpaying" our mortgage and HELOC. Student Loans could be deferred. The bottom line is that we could live off of one salary if we needed to.

If both of us were to lose our jobs at the same time, we would have about 6 months to find new jobs based on severence, unemployment and current savings. I understand that the concept of the EF is planning for worst case scenarios, but shouldn't you also factor in the liklihood of the emergencies occuring. I would think you would want to carry a higher EF if you were relying on one income because there is a single point of failure or if you felt there was a risk of losing your job.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:01 PM
tripods68 tripods68 is offline
$ Saving College Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,037
Last Blog Entry: Payment Option 1 or 2
Points: 5625.00
Donate
Default

JinCO,

ROI 6% or 8% is not enough to WOW me to not pay off my student loan sooner. For one, how bout if you lose your job? Second, factor in the inflation rate today 4% substract 8% ROI = NET ROI is only 4% (less expense ratio) Versus paying 2.65% student loan next year. Not much there to be excited about. Is it worth it to pay off student loan knowing you no longer have interest cost to carry versus netting 1% or 2% ROI adjusted for inflation. Unless, you can guarantee a 12% ROI we all know that's not how the market works. Again, past performances does not guarantee future returns. Sorry, but I'm for paying off student loans.
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:08 PM
JinCO JinCO is offline
$ Saving HS Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 127
Points: 715.00
Donate
Default

tripods68 - thanks for your post. Paying off the student loans does seem like the general consensus. I still want to model it out to see what the numbers say.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:12 PM
Scanner Scanner is offline
$ Saving College Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,015
Points: 12233.60
Donate
Default

Tripod,

Student loans have forebearance and deferment for job loss and disability.

You also seem to apply the inflationary number 4% to the ROI on the 401(k) but not apply it to the student loan.

If he's paying 2.65% on the student loan and there is 4% inflation, hell, that's great, right?

His student loan balance is just getting smaller by looking at it with high inflation. He's got cheap money.

We could argue about 6, 8 or 10%. . . I personally think the stock market will stall at 0% the next 5 years until we are able to get on an alternative energy source in America. Once that happens, there will probably be a run-up. to catch up to 6-8%.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:17 PM
tripods68 tripods68 is offline
$ Saving College Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,037
Last Blog Entry: Payment Option 1 or 2
Points: 5625.00
Donate
Default

JinCo,

I'm glad you agree. You actually have a bigger problem that lies ahead aside paying off your student loans. How best to reduced future tax liabilities at your current income. Tax thing is not my forte. But i have many friends started investing in rental properties just to avoid paying too much taxes.

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:29 PM
tripods68 tripods68 is offline
$ Saving College Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,037
Last Blog Entry: Payment Option 1 or 2
Points: 5625.00
Donate
Default

Scanner,

This is a matter of preferance. As I said, 4% versus paying 2.65% student loans DOES not get me excited at. Maybe to you. More importantly, I preferred not having any student loan payments if I have JinCO's income.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:43 PM
noppenbd noppenbd is offline
$ Saving College Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 888
Last Blog Entry: Refi Done Deal
Points: 2170.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tripods68 View Post
Scanner,

This is a matter of preferance. As I said, 4% versus paying 2.65% student loans DOES not get me excited at. Maybe to you. More importantly, I preferred not having any student loan payments if I have JinCO's income.
You are not comparing apples to apples. 4% ROI after inflation should be compared to student loans after inflation... if inflation is 4%, then student loan effective interest rate is negative 1.35%!
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:45 PM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Assistant Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 3,858
Last Blog Entry: Using a retirement calculator
Points: 19948.63
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JinCO View Post
jIM_OHIO - the 6% number was just used in my model, not based on actuals. I was trying to be conservative when forecasting but I will move it to 8% for now and track the results.

12 months seems like a pretty hefty emergency fund. We do have some levers to work with if one of us lost our jobs. $2600 in child care costs would go away right of the bat. We could also reduce / eliminate $401K investing. We could also reduce "overpaying" our mortgage and HELOC. Student Loans could be deferred. The bottom line is that we could live off of one salary if we needed to.

If both of us were to lose our jobs at the same time, we would have about 6 months to find new jobs based on severence, unemployment and current savings. I understand that the concept of the EF is planning for worst case scenarios, but shouldn't you also factor in the liklihood of the emergencies occuring. I would think you would want to carry a higher EF if you were relying on one income because there is a single point of failure or if you felt there was a risk of losing your job.
I tier my EF into 2 layers.

The first layer is the cash layer. I have 3 months expenses in CDs. Three 90 day CDs, each CD maturing 30 days from the previous or 30 days before the next one.

The second layer is the stability layer (for mid term expenses, emergencies and similar). I invest this in PRPFX, which has double/triple the return of the CDs, and the risk profile of the investment suggests it will rarely lose money (year over year).

The second layer for me is also where deposits go for the following:

1) kids college savings
2) new car fund
3) any mid term expense such as a vacation in 3 years, new roof, or similar.

I might suggest you tier your EF to be the following:

1) calculate one months expenses if a spouse was NOT working. Set aside 3 months of this value in a cash based investment.

2) set aside months 4-12 of the same number in a more growth oriented investment.

3) set aside an additional amount based on two spouses not working (maybe 3 months total expenses).

Logic being:
Cutting back is a way to make 3 months expenses become 6 months. It is not how I would plan to handle a short term problem. What if your child gets sick and both spouses need to leave work for a short amount of time? What if spouse A gets sick and spouse 2 loses job? If you planned on cutting back to get budget in line with income, you are living "paycheck to paycheck". If you have cash set aside, the cutting back just allows that cash to go further.

In an emergency, cash is king. Cutting back is overrated and means you have not saved enough.

I am never surprised when this board blindly recomends to pay off debt... but I think in your case most people do not see the tax situation here. Your income suggests a tax plan is more important than a managing debt plan. Good thing the board's advice is free. That tax plan will probably suggest keeping debt (such as a mortgage) where you can write off a portion of the interest. You could probably also create your own business (of some sort) to get even more writeoffs. The tax plan will save you more than the interest you pay every year in student loans.

When doing the planning (projections) of net worth, you need to have an end goal in mind. Might be the day your child goes to college, might be the day both spouses can retire, might be the day a research project ends. That end goal is where
a) you need to know net worth
b) you need to know value of investments
c) you need to know how much debt you still have
d) you need to know monthly expenses

I would then work backwards. Are the expenses you have today close to the expenses you will have at that date?

What would it take to have debt paid off by that debt? If date is far enough out, the debt might go away quietly on it's own. If date is real soon, the debt needs to be paid off aggressively.

If the investments do not cover the expenses, you need to adjust the debt pay down previously to make sure an 8% (or x%) growth rate gets the needed investment balance.

If the net worth covers the expenses (but investments do not), consider reallocating the debt payoff structure (similar to previous step) to make sure you have liquid cash to cover real expenses.

Because there are so many unknowns when doing this, you need to be conservative in some ways, optimistic in others, and plan for many situations.

For example: what if you invested instead of paying down the debt. If your total debt load is 800k (500k house, 300k student loans), maybe you invest until you have enough set aside to pay off the debt. Then once you have the debt balance set aside (so net worth is zero), start paying off the debt. letting the money which had been set aside keep growing.

In this case you kept liquid funds when risk was high (high debt is high risk). Once you crossed the point where you are worth more than your debt, you pay off the debt to lower your risk, while you still have the liquidity to solve other problems if needed.

This is my plan (for me) more or less. Keep cash on hand growing faster than my debt. Once I can pay off my $325k mortgage with cash on hand, I will stop setting aside extra payments in an investment, and start making real extra payments to the debt. I keep my liquidity (which is my primary goal when dealing with debt), while also working towards time timeline which has me retiring the year my oldest graduates college (57) or high school (53).
__________________
*Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
*One person's stupidity is another person's job security.
[URL]http://jim.savingadvice.com/[/URL]
[URL]http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Calvin_Coolidge/[/URL]
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:46 PM
disneysteve's Avatar
disneysteve disneysteve is offline
$ Saving College President
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10,208
Last Blog Entry: Thinking about paying the mortgage
Points: 66811.30
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JinCO View Post
It seems like a lot of the posts are saying that we have been financially irresponsible by accumulating so much debt.
Some people think all debt is bad. Others don't.

Having graduated professional school with 6-figure student loans, I'd have to say I'm one who doesn't see a problem with taking on debt that serves a good purpose and that you will have the means to repay in a reasonable amount of time.

When I was first out of school, and for quite a few years after that, we lived pretty lean and frugal. My loans had a 25-year repayment schedule. I paid them off in 12 (and it would have been 10 had I not changed jobs and been unemployed for a few months along the way).

Med school isn't something you can do part-time, online or through night school. It is all or nothing. Without the loans, it wouldn't have happened, so I've got no regrets at all.

Just wanted to throw in that opinion.
__________________
Steve

Join the 2009 Ebay Challenge!

* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:53 PM
tripods68 tripods68 is offline
$ Saving College Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,037
Last Blog Entry: Payment Option 1 or 2
Points: 5625.00
Donate
Default

I stand corrected noppenbd
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.
More Links Debt Consolidation Loans | Finance Options

About Us | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Link To Us | Resources | Webmasters | Media | Jobs | Site Map | Contact Us

Copyright ©2002-2009 SavingAdvice.com. All rights reserved.

Please read our Disclaimer

 

Other Resources
Bad Credit Loans
Private Student Loans
Payday Loans
Student Loans
Online Shopping
Dell Coupons
Credit Card Processing
Back to School
Apply Now for Personal Loans
Credit Score
Payday Loan
IVA
Free Credit Report
uk health insurance online
CD Interest Rates
IVA Advice

Partners
Debt Reduction
Blogging Away Debt
Budget Stretcher
DivaTribe
Thrifty Fun
Money Talk
Online Personal Budgeting
Budget Dial