Quote:
|
don't know if I agree with 40/30/30. When you introdue 3 people into a business, it will always be 2 against 1 unless everyone agrees. I personally wouldn't do anymore than 2 partners.
|
Yes but 2 against 1 is good.
I think of a successful partnership I know of w/ my best friend.
It's an ISP - my friend is 20% partner. He's in charge of the technical aspect of the business.
Then, there's the marketing guy - he's 40% partner. He markets and sells the business.
THen, there's the "moneybags/executive" who's been in small business for years, fairly rich, and had 10-30 employees. He handles day to day operations and is the executive (hires/fires, handles loans, payroll, legal aspects).
When there is an impasse on business, the partners call a vote.
Sometimes it's 40/40 against the 20.
Sometimes its 40/20 against 40.
The thing is there is never a stalemate and business gets done. Each person has their respective domain and administers the business therein. Sometimes the marketing and techie vote against the executive or any combination thereof.
My friend has been happy being 20% partner.
My take is most people have immature views on what a partnership is all about. A partnership doesn't always mean 50/50 and it probably shouldn't most of the time.