Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tinapbeana
but, birthrates declined after the baby boom, meaning at some point in the future there would be more retirees than workers and the system wouldn't function as it was intended (my taxes go to the government who turns around and mails them out to grandma). did they make any changes when birthrates went south? no. come up with a new system, or at least changes to the existing system? no.
|
I don't pretend to know the population statistics per demo so I won't embarass myself trying to quote them but I hear / read the above all the time.
do they really think there will be a time when there will be more people 65+ than there are 18 - 64 year olds living at the same time? I appreciate the amount of baby boomers out there but is it truly that many?
or is it that the ratio of pay ins to take outs will fall to an unmanageable point someday? that seems more reasonable to me.