"Money often costs too much." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
logo

Go Back   Saving Advice > Financial Chit Chat > General Discussion

General Discussion Please read our Forum Rules before posting
Feel free to talk about anything and everything about money.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2011, 07:54 AM
riverwed070707's Avatar
riverwed070707 riverwed070707 is offline
$ Saving College Freshman
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Where the river runs east to west
Posts: 510
Points: 2915.00
Donate
Default Since ya'll know so much about TVs...

Can anyone tell me what all is needed to get the 3D working on a 3D ready TV? We have a Sony Bravia NX810 that is about a year old. It is 3D ready, but I don't believe it has the transmitter in it. DHs bday is coming up and I was looking at the starter kits that come with a couple pairs of glasses, the transmitter and a movie. Is that all I would need? I see that there are 3D blu ray players now too -- any idea how to tell if the 3D will work with our existing blu ray player?

If I had to buy a new blu ray player in addition to everything else, I think that would be a deal breaker, but otherwise it seems reasonable as the price have come down drastically since we bought our TV last year. He's the electronic guru in our house but obviously I don't want to ask him or he'll know exactly what I'm up to.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2011, 11:14 AM
seen seen is offline
$ Saving Jr. High Schooler
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 79
Points: 3470.00
Donate
Default

Bluray players are not 3D by default. It needs to be 3D compatible.

Do you know the make/model of the player you have?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2011, 11:25 AM
riverwed070707's Avatar
riverwed070707 riverwed070707 is offline
$ Saving College Freshman
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Where the river runs east to west
Posts: 510
Points: 2915.00
Donate
Default

No -- its a sony also but I have no idea what the model is. I can try to look when I get home. It's about a year old as well
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-06-2011, 11:26 AM
Frugal Frugal is offline
$ Saving College Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 610
Points: 3360.00
Donate
Default

I agree that BlueRay players are not set up for 3D automatically. You would probably have to set that up. We have had a BR player for awhile, but didn't know you could set up 3D capability. We are also having problems with our TV right now (only about 2 yrs old).
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-06-2011, 11:44 AM
bjl584's Avatar
bjl584 bjl584 is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,544
Points: 15492.20
Donate
Default

If your TV is 3D ready, then all you should need is a Blue Ray that is 3D, and the viewing glasses.
__________________
MODERATOR

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:51 PM
Maggie55 Maggie55 is offline
$ Saving Kindergartener
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
Points: 30.00
Donate
Default 3D TV Service

You may want to check your local TV providers - (e.g. satellite, cable) offer 3D service
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:56 PM
disneysteve's Avatar
disneysteve disneysteve is offline
$ Saving Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 16,309
Last Blog Entry: March 2012 Survey Income
Points: 99391.30
Donate
Default

Am I the only one who thinks 3D TV is a fad that won't ever really catch on? I've checked out the 3D TVs in the store and it is kind of neat but I can't imagine watching it for any period of time. Even a 2-hour movie seems like a bit much. I've been to various 3D attractions at theme parks but those only last 15-20 minutes or so.

Maybe I'm influenced by the fact that I rarely just sit and watch TV. I'm almost always doing something else at the same time - reading the paper, doing something on my iPhone or iPad, etc., so wearing a pair of 3D glasses seems like it would be quite annoying. Besides, my wife can't see 3D so we wouldn't ever get a 3D TV.
__________________
Steve

* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2011, 05:06 PM
GREENBACK's Avatar
GREENBACK GREENBACK is offline
$ Saving College Senior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,537
Points: 8455.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by disneysteve View Post
Am I the only one who thinks 3D TV is a fad that won't ever really catch on? I've checked out the 3D TVs in the store and it is kind of neat but I can't imagine watching it for any period of time. Even a 2-hour movie seems like a bit much. I've been to various 3D attractions at theme parks but those only last 15-20 minutes or so.

Maybe I'm influenced by the fact that I rarely just sit and watch TV. I'm almost always doing something else at the same time - reading the paper, doing something on my iPhone or iPad, etc., so wearing a pair of 3D glasses seems like it would be quite annoying. Besides, my wife can't see 3D so we wouldn't ever get a 3D TV.
I don't neccesarily see it as a fad but it does need refinement. It's essentially the same thing I remember as a kid in the theatre but with better glasses now. I personally think this will eventually become as common as high def is now but it's not there yet. I too have seen it in the stores and was impressed but didn't care for wearing the glasses. Maybe the next "Steve Jobs" will refine this technology so it can be viewed without the glasses.
__________________
"Those who can't remember the past are condemmed to repeat it".- George Santayana.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2011, 08:52 AM
cypher1 cypher1 is offline
$ Saving Jr. College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 398
Points: 2095.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by disneysteve View Post
Am I the only one who thinks 3D TV is a fad that won't ever really catch on?
You're not the only one who thinks that way. I have yet to watch an impressive 3D movie (Avatar was ok) in the theater. Maybe its just me, but concept of having to use special glasses in order to watch a show/movie just seems like an inconvenience or nuisance for myself and audience. Although the guy I bought my amplifier from, loves his 3D home theater setup, claiming the experience is better than at the theater.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2011, 12:13 PM
elessar78 elessar78 is offline
$ Saving College Freshman
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 576
Points: 3265.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by disneysteve View Post
Am I the only one who thinks 3D TV is a fad that won't ever really catch on? I've checked out the 3D TVs in the store and it is kind of neat but I can't imagine watching it for any period of time. Even a 2-hour movie seems like a bit much. I've been to various 3D attractions at theme parks but those only last 15-20 minutes or so.

Maybe I'm influenced by the fact that I rarely just sit and watch TV. I'm almost always doing something else at the same time - reading the paper, doing something on my iPhone or iPad, etc., so wearing a pair of 3D glasses seems like it would be quite annoying. Besides, my wife can't see 3D so we wouldn't ever get a 3D TV.
Might be a niche for gamers. PS3 3D games, I've heard, are pretty awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2011, 07:20 AM
Kelvin Kelvin is offline
$ Saving First Grader
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 6
Points: 90.00
Donate
Default

Nice sharing of the information with us on this forum.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2012 SavingAdvice.com. All Rights Reserved.