"Poverty is no disgrace, but it's also no great honour." - Yiddish Proverb
logo

Go Back   Saving Advice > Financial Chit Chat > General Discussion

General Discussion Please read our Forum Rules before posting
Feel free to talk about anything and everything about money.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2011, 12:33 PM
disneysteve's Avatar
disneysteve disneysteve is offline
$ Saving Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 16,309
Last Blog Entry: March 2012 Survey Income
Points: 99391.30
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snafu View Post
Extrapolating that to all other goods and services would likely reduce consumption
I think that is probably true but that isn't necessarily a bad thing in the long run.

Anytime you distance the consumer from the actual cost of the product, you create problems.

For example, how many times does a patient tell me they want a certain test or procedure or medicine because it doesn't cost them anything to get it. Their insurance pays the bill. If the patient had to pay, even partially, for that service, they would think twice before getting it done.

I think the same would be true of consumer goods. Right now, we all have very little control over how much we pay in taxes. With a consumption tax, we would have a great deal of control. If we want to pay less in taxes, we can adjust our buying accordingly. I think that would be a good incentive to live a simpler life. That would impact the economy initially but over time, I think it would be a good thing - less waste, less sprawl, less debt, etc.
__________________
Steve

* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2011, 12:54 PM
snafu snafu is online now
$ Saving College Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: W. Canada
Posts: 1,566
Points: 8385.00
Donate
Default

Perhaps a better example is one offered by Shane C. Have the sale of cigarettes in New York state been affected since taxes were increased substantively? Is the tobacco industry as powerful a force as it was when their principals swore there was no evidence smoking was detrimental to health? Have the number of people working at all levels in the tobacco industry been reduced?

Yes there are other factors. I've wondered if McD type foods or sweet soda were taxed at 25%, would type II diabetes or obesity figures decrease?

Last edited by snafu : 05-17-2011 at 12:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2011, 01:25 PM
disneysteve's Avatar
disneysteve disneysteve is offline
$ Saving Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 16,309
Last Blog Entry: March 2012 Survey Income
Points: 99391.30
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snafu View Post
Have the sale of cigarettes in New York state been affected since taxes were increased substantively? Is the tobacco industry as powerful a force as it was when their principals swore there was no evidence smoking was detrimental to health?
That is a good example. Smoking has decreased dramatically in this country over the years as more and more was learned about the dangers of smoking and as the cost has risen. The highest percentage of smokers is among the poor and many of them can no longer afford to smoke like they used to. Plus, thanks to smoking bans, there are fewer and fewer places where you can smoke indoors. That has also helped a lot.

As for taxing junk food, I'm sure that would help, too. The McD Dollar menu is a terrible creation. It encourages people, again especially the poor, to buy cheap crap instead of a decent meal.
__________________
Steve

* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2011, 03:05 PM
maat55's Avatar
maat55 maat55 is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,481
Points: 18557.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shanecurran View Post
This is a poor example for a few reasons. One problem is that taxes would be levied on all goods, so that consumption would not be affected in the ways you have described.
Products already have hidden/embedded taxes built in. A consumption tax would eliminate those taxes and replace them with a transparent tax. The Fair Tax research has determined that goods and services, on average, have 22% embedded taxes. This is why it offers a 23% tax(inclusive to replace inclusive hidden taxes) to replace the current system which is cumbersome and costly to manage.
__________________
Marcus Tullius Cicero:
The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2011, 04:06 PM
disneysteve's Avatar
disneysteve disneysteve is offline
$ Saving Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 16,309
Last Blog Entry: March 2012 Survey Income
Points: 99391.30
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maat55 View Post
Products already have hidden/embedded taxes built in. A consumption tax would eliminate those taxes and replace them with a transparent tax. The Fair Tax research has determined that goods and services, on average, have 22% embedded taxes. This is why it offers a 23% tax(inclusive to replace inclusive hidden taxes) to replace the current system which is cumbersome and costly to manage.
How would it replace embedded taxes, though? The manufacturer would then be paying the 23% tax on the raw materials to make the product which would then have the 23% tax paid by the final buyer. Or would things bought in that manner, like raw materials to make another product, not be taxed?
__________________
Steve

* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2011, 04:19 PM
maat55's Avatar
maat55 maat55 is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,481
Points: 18557.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by disneysteve View Post
How would it replace embedded taxes, though? The manufacturer would then be paying the 23% tax on the raw materials to make the product which would then have the 23% tax paid by the final buyer. Or would things bought in that manner, like raw materials to make another product, not be taxed?
The Fair Tax only taxes at the retail level. It eliminates all production taxes.
__________________
Marcus Tullius Cicero:
The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2012 SavingAdvice.com. All Rights Reserved.