|
||||||
| General Discussion Please read our Forum Rules before posting Feel free to talk about anything and everything about money. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|||
|
I understand how business and speculation can effect stock prices, but how much effect does politics have on the market?
Side note: I consider myself fairly intelligent, but politics is something I cannot seem to learn and understand. Can someone offer some good politics101 resources that start from the basics? I absolutely love about.com 's investing for beginners. Investing for Beginners They have good information on issues, but not the basics of politics. Any resources would be greatly appreciated. I have also gone through college and had government 1 & 2 and still never picked it up. |
|
|||
|
The stock and bond markets and not logical and react to emotions. They are buffeted about like a paper ship on the ocean. Managers of Multi million dollar Mutual Funds must invest their client's money, large pension funds have a responsibility to keep people afloat. If you get 4 economists in a room, you'll get five or six opinions! Bellicose politicians feel it's better to get their name in front of constituents whether they offer wishful thinking, downright lies or just lots of noise to get attention. 'The media is the message' seems to have gotten out-of-hand. We can Blog, Twitter and Tweet to to add our spin on issues. PR people are paid big bucks to fix damaged reputations...even when the individual [Nixon for example] has passed on.
A lot of people enjoy Sarah Palin because she prefers to operate without facts. She would have you believe she can see Russia from her home base in Alaska. Some days I wondered who is the better comedian Tina Feh or Sarah Palin. Sometimes it's just a big circus scene for the millennium. |
|
||||
|
So much of the market is programmed trading, and that trading reacts to the news of the day, whether that news is a hurricane in Haiti, which might slow oil production, a reaction to unemployment claims (which the gov't indirectly controls) or a reaction to elections.
I would focus on various schools of fiscal policy. Things like supply side economics vs Keynesian economics vs random walk theory. Each of those is a "point of view" which believes it is correct (meaning the other two are wrong). For example maat is probably a supply side guy (this is a SWAG)... I probably lean more to Keynesian, and many investors here might believe more of the random walk side...
__________________
|
|
||||
|
[quote]
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Marcus Tullius Cicero: The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
If the politicians do not take away the handout programs in good times, those also get abused, so if there is a second choice, it is supply side, but I prefer some moderate forms of assistance (just not giving 150 weeks of it).
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Example: The federal government decides that everyone should own a home, wah la, we have a massive bubble and burst, hence our current depression.
__________________
Marcus Tullius Cicero: The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
www.Krantcents.com "Making sense of money" |
|
||||
|
Quote:
A common tactic used by politicians is fear. If you are following someone who wants you to be scared, they are not a good leader and you should consider finding a better leader. And finally, "follow the money". Ask yourself, does someone stand to benefit monetarily from me believing what is said?
__________________
Under Capitalism man exploits man; under Communism it's vice versa. -John Kenneth Galbreath Last edited by Snodog : 01-02-2011 at 07:29 PM. |
|
|||
|
I am simply saying that this has to be put in proportion. Just because people talk about politics at the office or on the subway, doesn’t mean the market cares.
Last edited by Bastille : 01-22-2011 at 12:33 AM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
So we would be left with no one to vote for/follow. |
|
||||
|
I was thinking more along the lines of well-to-do businessmen funding various "think tanks", and talk show hosts convincing listeners that tax breaks for them is whats best for the country.
__________________
Under Capitalism man exploits man; under Communism it's vice versa. -John Kenneth Galbreath |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|