"The only way not to think about money is to have a great deal of it." - Edith Wharton
logo

Go Back   Saving Advice > Financial Chit Chat > General Discussion

General Discussion Please read our Forum Rules before posting
Feel free to talk about anything and everything about money.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2010, 05:33 PM
Angio333 Angio333 is offline
$ Saving HS Senior
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 299
Points: 1895.00
Donate
Default How Much Would You Pay To Keep Rover Alive?

The new issue of Smart Money Magazine has an article about the growing business of treating pets for diseases such as cancer.

One person in the article spent $20,000 on her dog! Yes, you read that right - $20,000! $14,000was spent treating him for cancer and $6,000 for treating another illness.

I love my cat, but I would not pay $14,000 to treat him for cancer. However, I would spend a decent amount of money to treat him for illnesses and injuries. Right now, I don't know what my limit is - but it is WAY less than what the lady in the article paid. I guess it would be around $1,500 - but I am only estimating. It may be a little more or less.

What about you? How much would you be willing to spend to treat your beloved cat or dog?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2010, 05:45 PM
krantcents's Avatar
krantcents krantcents is offline
$ Saving HS Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 328
Points: 1945.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angio333 View Post
The new issue of Smart Money Magazine has an article about the growing business of treating pets for diseases such as cancer.

One person in the article spent $20,000 on her dog! Yes, you read that right - $20,000! $14,000was spent treating him for cancer and $6,000 for treating another illness.

I love my cat, but I would not pay $14,000 to treat him for cancer. However, I would spend a decent amount of money to treat him for illnesses and injuries. Right now, I don't know what my limit is - but it is WAY less than what the lady in the article paid. I guess it would be around $1,500 - but I am only estimating. It may be a little more or less.

What about you? How much would you be willing to spend to treat your beloved cat or dog?
I don't know if I can say a dollar amount out of context. It depends on age, illness and if I can afford it. After all, a pet is like a family member.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2010, 06:25 PM
KTP KTP is offline
$ Saving College Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 914
Points: 5170.00
Donate
Default

The general rule of thumb of how much to pay is:

(2x original cost of dog) + (expected dog years left x 10)
- (number of dog poos in house x 100) - (times dog barks all night x 1000)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2010, 12:54 PM
DebbieL DebbieL is offline
$ Saving College Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 997
Points: 5250.00
Donate
Default

I have $30,000 health insurance on my dog so I won't have to worry about these issues. I truly love him like a family member. If he were very old, I don't know if I would want to put him through cancer treatments that would only give him an extra few months (and make him miserable). If he were 5 years old or something, it is a different matter. He is the best friend I could ask for.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2010, 12:56 PM
Ima saver's Avatar
Ima saver Ima saver is offline
$ Saving College Dept. Head
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 8,056
Last Blog Entry: Graduation day!
Points: 96199.40
Donate
Default

I would spend any amount to keep my girls with me for as long as possible.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2010, 06:28 PM
jaystone jaystone is offline
$ Saving First Grader
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Points: 65.00
Donate
Default

I think this is one of those situations that you can't really answer until you've been in it. From my experience, it typically isn't presented as spend X dollars to save your pet. It usually starts out with a visit, some tests, maybe an overnight stay, more tests, medicine, more visits, etc. My wife and I had two dogs and one of them became ill a little over a year and a half ago. I am the type of person that cringes at the $30 bill for the groomer every six weeks, but when confronted with this situation I didn't bat an eye at spending about $2000 in a 4 week timespan for an illness that ended up being terminal. The negative prognosis is what stopped us from spending more.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2010, 05:01 AM
Redraidernurse Redraidernurse is offline
$ Saving HS Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 120
Points: 685.00
Donate
Default

We choose to not have any pets because I see them as an added expense and chore in our lives. I think I would bond with a "fluffy" and have a difficult time not spending money to save their life.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2010, 07:26 AM
disneysteve's Avatar
disneysteve disneysteve is offline
$ Saving Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 16,309
Last Blog Entry: March 2012 Survey Income
Points: 99391.30
Donate
Default

As a physician, I can't help but point out the human corollary when these discussions come up. People will have a sick animal put to sleep to avoid pain and suffering (and perhaps, expense) but when it comes to grandma, they always want the doctors to "do everything possible." For some reason, people consider quality of life and cost with their dog but not with their loved ones. I think, honestly, a big reason for that is that with the dog, the person is paying the costs out of pocket but with the person, insurance in footing the bill so people don't have the personal investment in the decision.

The only pets we have are fish, so cost is minimal and there isn't really the personal attachment. When one dies, we get another. Or in our case, our fish breed in the tank, so they replenish themselves. I've spent very little for "medical" care for our fish tank - perhaps $25 over the past 5 years.

As jaystone said, it is hard to answer this question until you are actually there, but I can't see myself ever spending thousands of dollars to keep an animal alive. I guess that is just one part of why we don't have any.
__________________
Steve

* Despite the high cost of living, it remains very popular.
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2010, 07:22 PM
GREENBACK's Avatar
GREENBACK GREENBACK is offline
$ Saving College Senior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,537
Points: 8455.00
Donate
Default

As one who has spent thousands of hours and dollars breeding, training and caring for dogs this is one of the more difficult decisions to make. For my animals I often look at quality of life first. My dogs are sporting dogs that have their greatest joy when out swimming, running and pursuing things. When this becomes nearly impossible to do for them, it's time to look at the end of life issue. While I'd easily spend a few grand to keep a relatively young healthy animal going, I might not for an older animal that probably won't be around to do the things they love to do in a couple years.

I've learned to not look at it as a money issue as much as a quality of life issue. I know it's hard to put a dollar figure on it until moment of truth arrives. My high so far has been 4k for a dog that lived 6 more years and had two litters. The pups paid for the surgery. Not the way I intended for things to go but it worked out that way.
__________________
"Those who can't remember the past are condemmed to repeat it".- George Santayana.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2010, 01:53 PM
cjscully cjscully is offline
$ Saving HS Freshman
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: California
Posts: 142
Points: 770.00
Donate
Default

This is definitely a tough call to make before you're in the position of having an animal needing that level of care. I love my dog. I don't think I could pre-determine a spending limit on her care or use a formula like the one posted by KTP. I guess I have to cross that bridge when I get to it.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2010, 02:41 PM
jpg7n16 jpg7n16 is offline
$ Saving College Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,226
Points: 14915.00
Donate
Default

On a related note, as I don't have any pets... do they sell vet insurance? (not life insuarance on a pet, but like health insurance for your animal)
__________________
-JPG

`It is more blessed to give than to receive.'
Acts 20:35b
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2010, 05:40 PM
Snodog's Avatar
Snodog Snodog is offline
$ Saving Jr. College Student
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 442
Points: 2624.00
Donate
Default

$0 because I never would have bought Rover in the first place.

We are cat people.

Jazzy our 6 year old whom we call our cat-dog, acts just like a dog following us around from room to room and is genuinely interested in what we're doing.

She uses the litter box and doesn't slobber or bark.

Don't know how much I'de spend to keep her alive. A lot would depend on the prognosis.
__________________
Under Capitalism man exploits man; under Communism it's vice versa. -John Kenneth Galbreath

Last edited by Snodog : 12-20-2010 at 05:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2010, 12:07 AM
Mjenn Mjenn is offline
$ Saving Jr. High Schooler
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 86
Points: 435.00
Donate
Default

This has been a question we've struggled with since we have 2 pets and love them to death. We decided to get them insured, and I am very grateful for it. Our cat, for example, suffers from extreme allergies - and needs shots on a regular basis - surprisingly enough, our insurance covers this cost with only a small deductible. It makes a big difference.

I could see the dilemma of putting an animal down because they had cancer - but I would hate to have to put an animal down because they suffered from allergies (she was terribly uncomfortable - itchy, sneezing and vomiting all the time) - and the cost would have been well into the thousands by now - 3 years after her diagnosis.

For me it would be about quality of life and length of life - if I knew the treatment would be painful and that it would only give another year, I don't think I would do it, irregardless of the cost.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2010, 08:22 AM
Slug's Avatar
Slug Slug is offline
$ Saving College Sophomore
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 861
Last Blog Entry: My blog
Points: 4658.00
Donate
Default

When I read the title, I thought maybe NASA was taking donations to keep the Mars Rover exploration alive.
__________________
Did you learn something from me? Learn even more at my blog: Sunk Costs Are Irrelevant
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2010, 08:43 AM
jpg7n16 jpg7n16 is offline
$ Saving College Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,226
Points: 14915.00
Donate
Default

Nerd hahah
__________________
-JPG

`It is more blessed to give than to receive.'
Acts 20:35b
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-25-2011, 01:45 AM
charley_alford charley_alford is offline
$ Saving Third Grader
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 18
Points: 110.00
Donate
Default

My dog is part of my family and I would not spare any expense when it comes to his life. Don’t keep a pet if you don’t want to take responsibility for its well being.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2012 SavingAdvice.com. All Rights Reserved.