| Teaching you to Save Money |
|
|
|
General Discussion Please read our Forum Rules before posting
Feel free to talk about anything and everything about money. |

01-31-2008, 05:29 PM
|
|
Hopeless Optimist
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,560
Points: 26237.30
Donate
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maat55
The only domestic program you should worry about is your back pocket.
|
Hehehe. Had a chuckle at that one.
|

01-31-2008, 05:57 PM
|
 |
$ Saving Professor
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,257
Points: 45961.30
Donate
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maat55
My CPA told me today it will NOT be taxed in 2008.
|
So we're all going to get this check and it will have absolutely no effect on our 2008 taxes. We'll still owe the same amount we would have owed or still get the same refund we would have gotten even if we had never received that check. Is that correct as far as everyone knows?
__________________
Steve
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
* The world is a book and those who don't travel read only one page.
|

01-31-2008, 07:24 PM
|
|
$ Saving College Senior
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,581
Points: 12076.50
Donate
|
|
I heard its just eliminating a tax bracket as well.
|

01-31-2008, 09:50 PM
|
|
$ Saving Fifth Grader
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 45
Points: 320.00
Donate
|
|
CNN warns of Tax Rebate Scammers
Check it out on their site.
Doesn't surprise me at all that people would stoop so low..........they're using the phone and Internet to get your banking info so they can 'direct deposit' your check.
|

02-02-2008, 12:22 AM
|
 |
$ Saving HS Senior
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
Posts: 263
Points: 1785.00
Donate
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleta
Sweeps: It's possible that they might consider social security as earning money in order to help the older ones on fixed incomes.
|
I don't think so, Aleta. It appears that Pelosi sold those of with only Social Security income down the river. And the Senate Democarats also don't appear willing or able to fight the Republicans in order to get S.S recipients included. 
Last edited by Exile : 02-02-2008 at 12:30 AM.
|

02-07-2008, 01:39 PM
|
|
Hopeless Optimist
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,560
Points: 26237.30
Donate
|
|
Update: Senate breaks stimulus stalemate
One tiny blurb at the end:
Quote:
Other lawmakers worried about expanding the budget deficit.
"We have to remember that every dollar being spent on the stimulus package is being borrowed from our children. And our children's children," said Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H.
|
|

02-07-2008, 08:48 PM
|
|
$ Saving First Grader
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
Points: 85.00
Donate
|
|
I had recently heard something about $600, what is the final number here, anyone know?
|

02-08-2008, 04:12 AM
|
|
$ Saving Fifth Grader
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 42
Points: 240.00
Donate
|
|
I believe its $600 per adult, $1200 for a married couple. I think the $300 per dependent got axed though.
|

02-08-2008, 05:38 AM
|
 |
$ Saving Professor
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,257
Points: 45961.30
Donate
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dardhel
I think the $300 per dependent got axed though.
|
Nope. It includes $300 per child up to 2 kids, or $600. So a family with 2 kids will get $1,800.
__________________
Steve
* Why should I pay for my daughter's education when she already knows everything?
* There are no shortcuts to anywhere worth going.
* The world is a book and those who don't travel read only one page.
|

02-08-2008, 06:01 AM
|
|
$ Saving Fifth Grader
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 40
Points: 250.00
Donate
|
|
I looked up the statutory language of the bill this morning and I could not find anything about a limit of two kids.
Also - the reason I went looking for this is because I could find no other site that detailed how the phase out works for AGI greater than $150,000. This language says you reduce your rebate by 5% of every dollar you make over $150,000. So a couple with two kids making ove $186,000 would receive $0.
Statutory language of bill
|

02-08-2008, 07:00 AM
|
|
Hopeless Optimist
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,560
Points: 26237.30
Donate
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by texastek76
I looked up the statutory language of the bill this morning and I could not find anything about a limit of two kids.
|
I knew I should've had 12 kids.
|

02-08-2008, 07:06 AM
|
|
$ Saving College Senior
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,595
Points: 8648.60
Donate
|
|
There should be a limit on that. Someone deciding to have a thousand kids should not be the governments bailout. We as tax payers shouldn't have to bail out people's decisions for having probably kids that they can't afford. I personally, don't have a problem with the older folks. They pretty much live on a fixed income and probably will be the ones to spend the stimulus money out of need.
|

02-08-2008, 07:43 AM
|
|
$ Saving Kindergartener
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3
Points: 35.00
Donate
|
|
Hi all long time lurker, first time poster.
Anyway, I am reading that this "rebate " will affect our 2008 tax returns. I found this article on MSN, and it states that:
This isn't free money for most people
The rebate checks are basically an advance on taxpayers' 2009 refunds. After similar rebates were sent out in 2001, tax expert Mark Luscombe said, "a lot of people were upset to see their (next) refund reduced."
The only people for whom this really is free money are low-income folks who won't end up owing any taxes for 2008. Basically, that would be people who earn at least the minimum $3,000 required to trigger the checks or who receive at least $3,000 in Social Security or veterans benefits.
So lets take a situation. Lets say I was expecting to get back $500 on my 2009 return, and my wife and I receive our $1200 "rebate". Does this mean that we would now owe $700?
Am I reading this correctly. It sounds like a lot of people are going to be in big trouble this time next year if they spend that "rebate".
|

02-08-2008, 08:25 AM
|
|
$ Saving College Senior
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,595
Points: 8648.60
Donate
|
|
I understood it to say that they had to wait until the 2007 tax returns came in. I never heard anything about it being an advance for 2008. They did this before and it put some people into a fiancial hole thinking that it was free money.
|

02-08-2008, 08:28 AM
|
|
$ Saving Kindergartener
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3
Points: 35.00
Donate
|
|
OK, I have answered my own question. God forbid they actually release some information on tax implications.
Anyway the 10% tax bracket which taxes the first $6000 earned per person will be eliminated in 2008. You will have to disclose that you received a rebate check on your 2008 returns or you would basically get the money twice.
I have not been able to figure out the implications for the $300 per child. I am hoping that they increase the child tax credit to $1300 per child in 2008.
This makes me feel a lot better, and I can now pay off unsecured debt with it without worrying about oweing the IRS next year.
|

02-08-2008, 08:49 AM
|
|
$ Saving College Senior
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,595
Points: 8648.60
Donate
|
|
Why would they give out $1,300 per child when they only give $600. for an individual who works? I think that this stimulis package is going to really hurt our economy in the long run. It will take quite a bit of time before the economy will even feel the effects of the money.
|

02-08-2008, 08:53 AM
|
|
$ Saving College Senior
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,595
Points: 8648.60
Donate
|
|
jfoster51: By the way, how many children do you have?
|

02-08-2008, 09:06 AM
|
|
$ Saving HS Junior
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 248
Points: 1973.40
Donate
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleta
Why would they give out $1,300 per child when they only give $600. for an individual who works? I think that this stimulis package is going to really hurt our economy in the long run. It will take quite a bit of time before the economy will even feel the effects of the money.
|
I think he mean't that the current Child Tax Credit is $1000 so if they up it to $1300 then that would make up for the $300 they are giving to you 'early'
So the definition of child is one eligible for the Child tax credit? (<17yo)
I have been trying to find the actual bill instead of all these incomplete articles.
|

02-08-2008, 09:30 AM
|
|
$ Saving Kindergartener
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3
Points: 35.00
Donate
|
|
I have 2 children, so the full rebate amount would be $1800.
Yes, I was reffering to the child tax credit of $1000 each, and if they would up it to $1300 for 2008 to offset the $300 / child rebate.
I have also been looking for the actual bill, but all sources state that it will not be available till it is signed into law.
|

02-08-2008, 09:37 AM
|
|
Hopeless Optimist
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,560
Points: 26237.30
Donate
|
|
According to this Marketwatch article, there is no limit on $300 rebates for children.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:18 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Featured Sponsors
IVA uk definitive guide
Bad Credit Loans
IVA Forum
IVA Book
Private Student Loans
Credit Cards
Payday Loans
moving
Student Loans
Online Shopping
Dell Coupons
Cash Loans
Credit Card Processing
Back to School
Apply Now for Personal Loans
Partners
Debt Reduction
Budget Stretcher
DivaTribe
Thrifty Fun
Money Talk
Online Personal Budgeting
Budget Dial |