"The wise man carries his possessions within him." - Bias
logo

Go Back   Saving Advice > Financial Chit Chat > Everything Else

Everything Else If it doesn't belong in any of the other forums, it goes here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2008, 05:50 PM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 5,388
Last Blog Entry: Career change
Points: 27923.63
Donate
Default Which candidate is most likely to balance the budget?

I am beginning to appreciate the economic benefits of Bill Clinton's administration even though I never voted for him.

Can someone tell me which candidate they think is most likely to balance the budget? Meaning if push came to shove, they would veto something because budget would not balance, or they would change taxes so the budget did balance?

If you can post a link as proof, that would be appreciated.
__________________
  • General questions get general responses. Specific questions get better responses. Want a better answer? Re-read my signature LOL
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2008, 06:26 PM
kork13 kork13 is offline
$ Saving College Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,249
Points: 12510.00
Donate
Default

haha that's a hard line to bite on without some legit research. ^_^ Everyone has theories and opinions, but proof (or incomplete/biased proof, or a lack of proof entirely) is always what will bite back at you... I'd love to contribute, but I'm not savvy on politics enough... So consider me an interested viewer.... I'm interested to see what people (hopefully) bring up.
__________________
"Praestantia per minutus" ... "Acta non verba"
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2008, 06:34 PM
sweeps sweeps is offline
Hopeless Optimist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,170
Points: 27012.30
Donate
Default

Ron Paul? LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 01:03 AM
Seeker Seeker is offline
$ Saving College Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 1,051
Points: 5385.00
Donate
Default

lol -- neither:

Quote:
The USA has a peculiar budgetary procedure. Its Federal budget is made up of 13 separate bills. They are submitted to Congress for approval by the administration. When the President and Congress disagree, some of the bills are not approved and certain government operations are shut down. This happened in the 1996 fiscal year. In fact, the budget for fiscal year 1996 has been approved only after the 1997 budget was.

In the case of such a deadlock, stop gap budgets are passed by Congress to allow the government to continue to function until a final budget is positively voted on.

Budget are acts of humans. They represent hard data implausibly coupled with aspirations, projections, goals and hopes. They are prone to mistakes, greed, cronyism, ulterior motives. The existence of a mechanism to amend budgets is, therefore, of the essence and to be greeted. A budget amendment is often ceased upon by the opposition as proof of the government's fallibility and failure. But in a changing world - they who do not adapt through change are doomed. Governments that amend their budgets midway merely admit that they are made of humans and are doing their nation a service.
Quoted from the end of the article here: The Delicate Art of Balancing The Budget - Politics
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 06:02 AM
PrincessPerky PrincessPerky is offline
$ Saving Assistant Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlotte NC, USA
Posts: 4,790
Last Blog Entry: Bought a sleeping bag
Points: 65474.31
Donate
Default

I would ditto niether of the big two..but I believe other candidates would balance it.

not that I like everything about Bob Barr or the libertarians....
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 06:39 AM
Caoineag's Avatar
Caoineag Caoineag is offline
$ Saving College Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 543
Last Blog Entry: Took some time off but I am back
Points: 2815.00
Donate
Default

I think you are out of luck. Neither one is talking about how to pay for the changes they want. I suspect McCain would be more expensive only because I think he is more likely to get us into wars. They both want tax cuts and both have some very expensive program wants.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2009, 10:38 AM
david4353 david4353 is offline
$ Saving Fourth Grader
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Points: 235.00
Donate
Default

Well, I guess we will know soon enough!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright © 2012 SavingAdvice.com. All Rights Reserved.