I got the proposal for Term and a Variable Universal Life Policy. I had to use a variable policy because Steve wanted to assume an 8% rate of return. I built a spreadsheet in Excel so anyone can use it for future analysis. There are several assumptions I had to make. One is the rate of return to assume in the "invest the difference account" and in the cash value policy. I also had to assume a tax rate for both accounts. Gain on the cash surrender value is taxed at ordinary tax rates. If your invest the difference account is invested in stocks then that gain would be considered capital gain. However, you would have to hold the investment more than 1 year to get long term capital gain rates. I assumed that account was taxed at 15%. I also assumed that the ordinary tax rate was 28%. The Term premium was $1855/yr. and the Variable WL policy preimum was $14,160/yr. The term premium was guaranteed for 20 years, so I assumed the other policy was paid for 20 years too. The spreadsheet takes a picture at the end of each year and assumes both policies are terminated and taxes are paid. IF you can earn 8% in both accounts then you are better off buying Term and investing the difference. The scenario changes away from Term the lower the rate of return you assume and the lower the tax bracket you are in. By the way, the term premium in year 21 jumps to $42,335 from $1855. So you better be sure you won't need the coverage.
If I drop the rate of return to 6% then the breakeven was at 12 years. BUT, that was still using the 8% Whole Life return. So, that is not a fair comparison, but I thought it was interesting to see how much difference only 2% makes.
Assumed tax rates make a difference too but not near as much as investment rates of returns. So, there are a lot of variables that must be plugged in to determine which is better for you. I'll be glad to share the spreadsheet if there is a way to upload it to this site. Then you can plug in your own numbers.
|