Quote:
Originally Posted by poundwise
Informative article; thanks for posting this Jeffrey. I have to say that I think the choice for thread title isn't the best as it focuses on the negative, while the actual headline and the facts expressed in the article are largely positive.
|
Criticism taken -- I don't like the unemployment % because the government has changed who is included and not over the years so that it is impossible to really compare to previous recessions. It seems to me that the "underemployment" number used to be a lot closer to what we called "unemployed" and that is why that number stuck out when I read the article.