Quote:
Originally Posted by jc3900
This is exactly why SS is a scam. 5 people in the beginning support the first person who collects it. Then you need 25 people to cover those 5. Then you need 125 people to cover those 25. If I was running an annuity/insurance product like this I would be rich, only at the expense of the system crashing and average young person like myself losing out.
Anyway, this is another problem with SS. It FORCES people to join. What if I don't want to join and it is a really sucky return and a sucky program for helping the less fortunate. I can't do anything. SS works only by lifting up a very small minority at the expense of screwing everyone else. (hey that kind of sounds like socialism) Oh wait.... THAT IS SOCIALISM.
|
JC- you are correct in that SS is a socialist program.
Government sponsored health care plans would also be socialist- do you support that?
I remember seeing FICA taken out of my first paycheck when I was 16 years old. Who are they and who gave them permission to take my money?
If you do not want to pay SS, I suggest you do any or all of the following
a) don't make any earned income (live on the street for example or hide all income from the IRS)
b) earn 1099 contractor income and run from the IRS a few years later when you do not resolve the issue.
c) move to a country with lower taxes. More than likely this will be a third world country. You may not even get running water.
What do YOU see as governments role in society? List the bad things and list the good things. You cannot only get the good without accepting some of the bad. Those are the compromises every adult makes in life. From the sounds of your posts- you tell us what to think and state opinions as facts.
Quote:
|
All I can say to you guys is that the current system will crash! In the end I will be proven right because the numbers just don't add up. All any of these entitlement programs do is prop up a small percentage of the population while draging down the large majority.
|
There is nothing factual in the post you wrote this in. It might be true, it might not be true. It is a prediction at best. I think it is a bad prediction- here are the FACTS as to why:
When SS was founded (by FDR in the 1940's), it was created when democrats (who often suggest socialist like programs) ran the white house and both sides of congress. I doubt such legislation would pass today based on partison voting.
It was founded to provide benefits around age 63 and the average life span of an adult was around 67 years old. In addition SS replaced close to 80% of the average person's income. Improvements in health care are what is causing the perceived lack of solvency. The general trend in the last 70 years has been to
a) raise the age a person can collect SS
b) not raise the benefits to level of spending needed
c) tax the benefits for high income retirees (there is a 50% tax on SS income above a threshold)
d) raise the SS tax paid by the working class
All the above have happened more than once and are FACTS. I have yet to see you post anything more than trolling opinions in the 2 threads on the subject.
One issue though is the government raised the age for benefits one year when life expectancy increases by 3 years or 5 years. This is what happens when the people making the decisions need to get elected.
So while in your quote you claim the numbers don't add up, you need a better equation than simple addition and multiplication. You need to factor in the policy changes which will pay the benefits needed and how to elect the people to make those changes. That is how democracy works. Democracy is FREEDOM. You are free to elect who you want to assuming the majority share your views.
I am guessing you live at home right now. Who provides your food, clothing and shelter? If your parents kicked your butt out on the street, what is your worst case scenario? Think about worst case- that is what SS is for.
It is socialist. It is a wealth transfer system. But I would hold the opinion is not transferring much wealth. Consider that the average income of a person in US is probably twice as high as the max benefit most will receive from SS. And I am guessing the people which qualify for max benefit also get that benefit taxed based on other income they receive when in retirement. I hear of $700-$1000 SS checks being common, and my monthly benefit on my statements is projected well north of $2500/month last I checked.
The USA has one of the biggest middle classes in the world (I believe it is the biggest). What this means is the average income in the US (which is around 40k) is quite high relative to same standards in other countries around the world.
Think about that. Avg income of all tax payers is just above 40k. Half above, half below. I think the median income is slightly higher. SS probably pays an average benefit of around 24-25k. This assumes a person qualified for the FULL benefit. I am guessing the average benefit based on the SS statements I receive. I could be proven wrong on this.
I am guessing you have not seen a SS statement. It shows a few things.
It shows how much I have paid into system.
It shows what my expected benefit is when I reach SS age
It shows what my current benefit is if I were to become disabled, or what my wifes benefit would be if I died today.
As I analyze that for 5 minutes when I read the statement (once every two years), and I see a few things.
1) to qualify for FULL benefits, you must work a certain number of units (and contribute to system during those units). I think a unit is 3 months. I think a person needs to work around 80 units, which is 20 years, to get full benefits.
So even if person is eligble based on AMOUNT contributed, they may have not gained eligibility based on length of time worked to receive that benefit back.
2) What changes could government make to take away that benefit from me.
a) increase that unit measurement (make me work longer and I would not be eligble, because I plan to retire before then)
b) decrease my benefit (I am OK with this, SS to me is beer money- I make much more than the average income above).
c) increase the age I can receive a benefit
d) some combination of a-b-c
What I would do instead of forming unfounded and unsubstantiated opinions is to LEARN.
I think I read you are 18. Are you going to college? The learning does not stop once you leave HS. It does not stop once you leave college. I have learned more between ages of 23 and 35 than I did before age 23.
If you come across less confrontational and less like a two bit troll, some of us smarter types might even be willing to help you.
Wait, I forgot, you oppose SS, you don't want to help anyone.