View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 08:50 AM
jIM_Ohio's Avatar
jIM_Ohio jIM_Ohio is offline
$ Saving Post Graduate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milford, OH
Posts: 2,592

Points: 13357.63
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noppenbd View Post
Assuming he is definitely moving in 1-2 years, and if the choices are:

1) Allow rate to float to 5.25% and pay nothing extra.
2) Bump rate to 4.25% and pay 0.75 pts.

Then #2 is mathematically better. With #1 you are paying 1% more interest each year ($2800) for 2 years, versus #2, adding $2100 to the loan.

This is assuming that otherwise the 2 loans are identical (both float the rate every 2 years).

That said, I generally detest ARMs because you never really know if you will be able to move in 2 years (will the market recover, financial situation changes, etc).
Agree on the math, but that $2800 needs to be looked at from two sides

It is only $2100 after taxes
If he could apply $2800 to pay down principal, what would the effective payment change or interest rate be? He does not have the $2800, so the principal balance goes up. Might save on interest, but it might extend the term more than needed. Not sure how to run that- it would be a complex ammortization table.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

One person's stupidity is another person's job security.
Reply With Quote