View Single Post
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 09:29 AM
simpleyme simpleyme is online now
$ Saving College Freshman
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 529
Points: 3040.00
Donate
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InDebtInDC View Post
I also disagree. Inflation in 15+ years will tend to help diminish the value of the fixed payment.

Also, if your house gets destroyed, you risk losing more equity with a 15-year mortgage as compared to a 30-year.

My high school teacher in 1995 was paying $250 a month on her 30 year mortgage that she closed in the 70s. When she signed her loan, the payment was a significant portion of her salary. In 1995, her fixed payment amounted to less than 10% of her salary.

I also strongly agree with disneysteve on being flexible with payments on a 30-year and prepaying, as opposed to being fixed to a high payment under a 15-year.


Would you rather a) own your home and have no money, or b) be homeless but have several hundred thousand dollars?

Personally, I choose (b), although I think I would get robbed rather quickly with that much cash living under a bridge


why would you lose more money if your home was destroyed I have insurance ,if my home is destroyed I own the land outright and am insured for the cost to rebuild?

our first house payment was 277 a super high amount at the time, within a few years all our neighbors were paying 400 dollars a month in rent
so time does seem to be on your side to "lower" your payments if you keep a long for the long haul
Reply With Quote